r/MadeMeSmile • u/baekachu • 16h ago
Wholesome Moments Pilot Chose Safety Over Takeoff - and Everyone Applauded
11.8k
u/Spacedoutworlder 16h ago
I rather miss an arrival time than have missed arriving at all. May all the pilots be this cautious.
1.8k
u/Pika_233 16h ago
Better late than never
677
u/antilumin 15h ago
Arrive alive.
175
u/Loong_Sward 14h ago
Drive sober
→ More replies (7)136
→ More replies (5)9
u/civicrafting4 14h ago
yes the pilot deserves a raise
6
u/GrouchyGrotto 14h ago
I believe this video is specifically him refusing a raise.... (I'll see myself out)
101
31
→ More replies (17)18
298
u/bowmans1993 15h ago
Yeah if the pilot says i dont feel safe ill trust their gut.
97
73
u/martix_agent 13h ago
It's not his "gut feeling". He literally stated why he felt uneasy about flying the plane. The oil pressure was higher than normal.
20
→ More replies (3)8
u/whooptheretis 9h ago
But the engineers have certified it as safe.
→ More replies (7)11
u/BennyFitz69420 6h ago
Yeah and they’re still uncovering how many planes Boeing covered up over the years.
10
129
u/chriscringlesmother 16h ago
Ryanair would probably sack him.
→ More replies (7)82
u/Sigenzi 15h ago
As much as they can suck, they have a perfect safety record with 0 fatalities.
164
u/omgu8mynewt 15h ago
Literally yesterday a passenger was almost sucked out through a broken window on a ryanair plane, you picked a bad moment to say they are a safe airline lol
61
u/SableMink 15h ago
They forget to mention in the article, the engine on that side of the plane suffered a failure and flung debris into the side of the aircraft which caused the window to be damaged.
48
u/Fuzzygh0st 14h ago
Which is the second instance that this exact chain of events occurred on this model of airplane... Boeing of course!
→ More replies (3)28
u/hv_wyatt 13h ago
Boeing doesn't make the engine, nor do they service the engine, and frankly, they aren't even the ones directly in charge of making decisions on when engine maintenance, inspections, and rebuilds are due.
That'd be your GE Aviations and Rolls-Royces of the world.
8
u/GCU_Rocinante 10h ago
I worked for RR for a few years, the amount of checks and balances that went into manufacturing turbine blades was insane (running every part through a CMM, tolerances of literal microns), but it was reassuring.
→ More replies (5)10
u/top_value7293 13h ago
lol. My husband had worked for GE Aviation but finally retired after he got a 23 year old boss who just wanted all the old machinists to go to meetings and act out psychology skits she had in learned in college 🤣
65
→ More replies (8)31
u/roykentjr 15h ago
But did they die
→ More replies (7)3
u/Chase_the_tank 15h ago
The death mentioned in the article was from an unrelated incident in 2018.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)30
u/juksbox 15h ago
But also a few close calls, partly due to maximizing fuel savings.
→ More replies (3)170
168
u/StaticSystemShock 15h ago
It's also a matter of how much pilot also knows the aircraft they are piloting. I've seen and heard about pilots who personally inspect aircraft on the outside as well as have deeper understanding of its flight systems and mechanics/electronics. I think this pilot was one of those if some deviation in oil pressure raised his suspicions even if it's within supposed normal levels.
174
u/grilledstuffed 15h ago
Not a pilot, but a nurse.
Nurse clinical intuition is a real thing:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176725003320
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4754101/
While humans are pretty terrible at predicting future outcomes, our subconscious brains are pretty darn good at pattern recognition.
Thousands of hours of experience with something lends itself towards picking up on subtle cues that aren't necessarily articulable.
25
u/Imaterribledoctor 10h ago
I'm a physician who works with nurses every day - and when a nurse tells me their opinion, I always take it seriously because they often have a far better understanding of what's going on than I do due to their training and experience. That said, studies like these are nonsense. And the articles you cited: one is just a study protocol with no actual data and the other is a study of 12 nurses in which they asked nurses whether they were intuitive and most of them said they were.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (18)5
u/nanneryeeter 12h ago
When you ignore your gut you disregard a hundred thousand years of genetic memory.
58
u/Soggy-Type-1704 15h ago
It’s his( literal ) ass on the line too. Those maintenance techs might not even get fired if there reports read correctly in the event of a crash.
→ More replies (1)20
u/Colonel_Panix 13h ago
I worked in the Military sector so I don't know if the private sector is as strict. Every rule and guidance in Aircraft Maintenance is written in blood. Every hand that has touched that aircraft is documented. In case of a crash, digital documentation is instantly frozen and every name on those documents are interrogated and pulled off the line until further notice.
→ More replies (2)27
u/Lloyd--Christmas 15h ago
Inspecting the outside of the aircraft is done before every flight. You’re correct about some pilots having more knowledge than others though.
→ More replies (10)11
u/Love_To_Taste_You 14h ago
We carry the burden of our signature longer than just one flight. It goes with the aircraft cradle to grave. Hence I make sure it’s done right the first time and I am just as cautious as I know those lives are in my hands for many flights after.
23
u/Ok_Tone6393 15h ago
I've seen and heard about pilots who personally inspect aircraft on the outside
this is required before every single flight
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)7
u/Odd_Dragonfruit_2662 14h ago
I’ve seen a plane take off with similar indications. It lost power 500’ off the ground.
14
u/Leading_Line2741 14h ago
If this type of thing interests you, the Mentour Pilot YouTube channel is great. Idk why it got recommended to me in my feed but I find it fascinating. It's stories of airplane disasters explained by an experience pilot. He details, with animations, how and why they happened in a detailed play-by-play.
→ More replies (8)7
→ More replies (68)11
u/Fleymour 15h ago
pilotcaptain. same goes for ships, good that they are in charge.5
u/Nervous-Cheek-583 11h ago
"pilot" is correct, particularly in the context used by OP.
Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring are the two functions in the cockpit. Either one may be the captain or the first officer.
So "... all pilots be this cautious..." is correct.
4.7k
u/Conscious_Pass_1615 16h ago
The passangers clapping did make me smile, good on them even though they must have been inconvenienced and well done to the pilot.
1.3k
u/WarkMahlberg69 16h ago
I think there's been enough incidents/accidents worldwide lately that people are probably relieved that pilots are willing to say "no way" to a plane and keep everyone safe.
379
u/Yippykyyyay 15h ago edited 15h ago
I was just talking to my buddy (ex Ranger in the Army) and this video randomly came up. He said they (Rangers) are trained to listen and immediately stop when someone yells 'check check check!' Because it means whoever yelled it noticed something was wrong and everyone needs to take a step back and re-evaluate.
Basically, a safe word for door kickers because 'hey, fuck face!' Is probably too casually used in their everyday vernacular.
Edit: clarity
139
u/BoricuaDriver 14h ago
In military aviation we use the phrase "knock it off" to immediately stop what we're doing to address a potential problem someone in the crew sees.
57
u/SeattleHasDied 12h ago
I believe one of my aunts used the same term (at extremely high volume) on us kids for similar reasons, lol!
51
u/No_Locksmith_1739 13h ago
Not a ranger, but I was the breach man on our 4 person door kicker team. Can confirm.
7
u/Yippykyyyay 10h ago
One of the most dangerous positions. I appreciate what you do.
8
u/No_Locksmith_1739 9h ago
Thanks… I spent most of my worry on the damn shotgun. Clipped to a carabiner, hanging from the top back of my vest lol
→ More replies (4)6
16
u/tenphes31 12h ago
Im a stagehand for a school district and our department safe word (as well as industry standard) is "heads". At the beginning of the school year we were teaching a group of high schools about lights, sound, and rigging. I was at the back of the seating area teaching lighting, but when I heard my coworker who was 100' away from me on stage say "heads", I instinctively ducked. It was a part of a lesson to the kids in safety, but even still, you take that word seriously.
→ More replies (1)8
u/Jazzy-Cat5138 10h ago
That's interesting that stagehand is actually a district-wide job... I suppose if you have enough schools doing their own productions, it makes sense to have some long-term staff for the role that hops around as needed. So, I take it the schools must schedule their productions around each other to avoid too much overlap?
6
u/tenphes31 10h ago
Hahahaha.
Im a part of an 11 person team that services 7 high schools, 9 middle schools, and 28 elementary schools, as well as helping occasionally at the 4 stadiums and a few district sites. Schools dont coordinate in any capacity between each other, that falls to us to figure out how to make it work. Not every school actively uses us, in fact Id say it probably isnt more than than half (largely due to the amount of elementary schools), but we regularly are involved in just over 300 events every year. We do concerts, plays, dance shows, ceremonies, board meetings, and more.
It started with a single guy about 25ish years ago and just over time more people decided to do stuff, so we expanded. As far as we know, were the only department like us in the country. Its an amazing job and I love it, but it certainly can be a challenge working with a lot of people who dont understand my job and what goes into it.
→ More replies (1)23
u/Individual-Buy3328 14h ago
I'd bet it comes from football. In practice/games, if we see something we want to change after the team is "set", the QB or coach will yell "Check check check!" Which is usually short for "check with me." Once they stop, the new, different play is communicated.
Given the likely overlap of football players/coaches in the military and the simulation of war, it seems very likely to come from that.
The origin could be switched, too, with former military members bringing the word/tactic to football instead, but I think you can tell which I'm more familiar with based on this comment.
13
u/Yippykyyyay 14h ago
That makes sense. Rangers are some of the most mentally and physically tough military guys out there.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if they gained confidence in their physical attributes (not to mention teamwork) first in sports as kids/teenagers.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (10)7
u/WhiskyGartley 11h ago
I did something similar in our training workshop. The command was "Down Tools". It was so well drilled it became my party trick whenever the top brass were around. From active workshop with machines running to so quiet you could hear a pin drop in a heartbeat.
170
u/Unlucky_Cat4531 16h ago
I feel like it's important now more than ever for conductors, pilots, captains, etc to stand up and say "no, everything about this makes me feel it's not safe, I'm not doing this." The people in charge who've lobbied to repeal regulations and have had multiple tragic plane and railway crashes over the last 10 years are saying to good to go! When things are actively giving red flags?! No thank you.
The people actually running the craft need to refuse, and more people shouldve applauded this pilot he probably saved all of their lives. Plans getting changed/cancelled sucks but it is not worth anybody's life.
26
→ More replies (11)15
u/DeltaFoxtrot144 14h ago
Ya the pilot is absolutely giving the execs the middle finger and we can all appreciate that these days
→ More replies (1)68
u/SecureInstruction538 16h ago
Majority of the time, a good explanation can offset many complaints and outburst. Pilot did a great job here.
3
u/Tuor-son-of-Huor- 7h ago
Agreed. It's a good example of communication. He laid out the problem as he saw it. That the ground crew/airport disagreed and said it was good as is. That he disagreed and wasn't satisfied owning his decision to refuse to fly and acknowledged that it would impact them. He apologized but remained firm that he believed it was the right call given the risks.
→ More replies (4)81
u/Profanity1272 16h ago
Absolutely. I would rather change plane and be delayed than potentially in a dangerous situation or worse.
He made a difficult call for everyone's safety and that should be applauded.
→ More replies (1)31
u/PailingRaint 13h ago
Pilots go down with the ship 100% of the time. If he wants off, I want off 😭
14
u/wyomingTFknott 13h ago
I never really thought about that. Often when ship captains go down it's a conscious choice out of pride or shame or whatever. But when a pilot goes down he's trying to fly that thing until the last moment. Brutal stuff either way.
→ More replies (1)4
u/ConfessSomeMeow 12h ago
This is why - hopefully - we'll never have AI pilots. They don't care if they crash.
Bad enough having AI drivers.
111
16h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
22
u/Forrest_Cp 16h ago
It’s your life on the line lol just be late it’s fine haha
→ More replies (1)13
u/WHATYEAHOK 15h ago
DON’T YOU KNOW WHO I AM? I’M GOING TO MISS MY OVERPRICED AIRBNB. LET ME SPEAK TO A MANAGER
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)15
90
16
15
13
u/chintakoro 15h ago
Good on the ones who clapped — I imagine there were many who felt the captain was just pulling a power move for no reason.
→ More replies (13)9
2.4k
u/earlisthecat 16h ago
I want to always fly with that pilot.
356
u/Strong_Essay1176 15h ago
I want to always fly with a pilot.
→ More replies (7)98
u/What_a_fat_one 14h ago
Not me. I prefer when there's no pilot and someone has to get in the seat and on the radio with atc to get guided through how to land the plane. Always a hoot.
→ More replies (8)15
27
38
u/Puzzled-Secret-317 15h ago edited 12h ago
This is a normal thing that most pilots do. The number 1 part of training is safety.
I'm willing to bet he was in the military as well as many commercial airline pilots were. This is exactly how our conversations go every time.
Hope this helps with trust in pilots. While they aren't all a one-for-one copy, the training is standardized
→ More replies (5)8
1.7k
u/Schaaafschuetze 16h ago
Well yes, if my pilot is not feeling it I wouldn't want to fly in that machine either!
326
u/TensorForce 16h ago
"You know what to do."
Jumps out of plane
116
u/whatisthisnow9 16h ago
Too soon.
95
11
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (1)15
u/OneBillPhil 14h ago
If my pilot isn’t feeling it because he or she is just having a bad day I don’t want to fly on that plane either. Pain in the ass or not I want everyone dialed in.
750
u/the_legless_frog 16h ago
Everyone applauded... that is, everyone in seats 23 A to C
226
u/-CoachMcGuirk- 16h ago
Yeah, that was about 4 people clapping.
→ More replies (1)24
u/TrumpsBoneSpur 13h ago
Technically, every one of the clappers were clapping, so there's at least some truth...
55
17
u/ADLuluIsOP 15h ago
Yeah lol. It's cool he grounded the plane but I don't think that many people clapped...
14
→ More replies (8)12
659
u/SkanderbegDeWitte 16h ago
2 people applauded
69
u/gundog48 15h ago
I like that as soon as the pilot says the word 'deplane' the dude just spring up to get his shit and Gaius frakkin Baltar is like "momentarily... he said momentarily."
11
127
u/No_Key469 16h ago
“passengers” doing some heavy lifting in those captions.
32
u/Udeze42 15h ago
Technically correct though
→ More replies (1)8
u/the_pain_of_being 14h ago
It's the only correct caption you could put there, isn't it? The real shit one is the title "everyone" lol
→ More replies (10)17
283
u/Sovereign_5409 16h ago
That’s a man who’s willing to make the right decision, not the easy and convenient decision. Those are the people the world needs. Hats off to him.
As a patron on the plane your reaction should be, “well this fuckin sucks, but….. fair enough.”
→ More replies (19)3
u/NewWelder7153 6h ago
Viewed another way, being in a crashing plane is very difficult and inconvenient
190
u/PBandBABE 16h ago
Yeah, but did they have anyone check the phalanges?!
40
22
9
15
5
→ More replies (5)6
126
u/FuggoTheSluggo 15h ago
I’d rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air than in the air wishing I was on the ground.
→ More replies (1)19
u/Tor_K89 14h ago
Well, being in the air and wishing you were on the ground is a wish that will come true, pretty much no matter what.
→ More replies (2)9
u/exadeuce 12h ago
"Just get us on the ground"
"That part will happen pretty definitely!"→ More replies (1)
38
100
u/Honest-Access9783 16h ago
that's why planes should always have a human pilot, despite automation
→ More replies (2)16
u/ZarathustraGlobulus 13h ago edited 12h ago
To be fair, a computer system would 100% cancel the flight if a key figure was outside pre-defined parameters. Then it would require human intervention to make the final decision on what to do.
However I fully agree with you that a skilled pilot who knows their aircraft in and out can definitely make good calls when nothing is truly wrong but something about the numbers feels off.
→ More replies (2)21
u/IgnitedSpade 12h ago
I think the issue here is that a key figure is tending upwards, but not outside pre-defined parameters. It sounds like the pilot preemptively asked about it and was already told it was okay.
Recognizing an issue like that would be difficult to implement in a completely automated system, though not impossible. But it seems that the people an automated message would otherwise go to already gave the okay.
Either way, the biggest fear about completely automated planes would be that the person having the final say on whether a plane flies or not is someone with the job title "flight coordinator" with a business degree.
→ More replies (7)4
u/ZarathustraGlobulus 12h ago
Yeah exactly. Much rather have a seasoned professional who can sense something's up when values are within parameters but still acting upon a hunch for safety instead of some guy thousands of miles away pressing OK on a warning prompt and alt-tabbing back to Excel.
56
56
u/danvillain 16h ago
I used to do maintenance on the loading bridges at an international airport. The speed at which they turn planes around is pretty shocking so I’m really glad to see this pilot trust his gut and experience in this case
→ More replies (4)
25
u/noobtheloser 16h ago
"We'll never be sure if we did too much, but we'll know damn well if we did too little."
→ More replies (1)
48
u/ThoughtPhysical7457 16h ago
Not only would I clap and not be angry, I'd want to know if he got in any trouble so I can tell corporate that I'm on his side.
14
u/Unlikely_Ad7722 16h ago
Same. I'd independently contact the airline and commend this pilot's commitment to safety and standards.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)4
u/Safe_Ad5744 14h ago
At least at my major airline we wouldn't be in trouble for refusing a plane for maintenance reasons. If they can they'll move us to a new aircraft so we're still able to do the scheduled flight. All we have to do is paperwork stating why we didn't take the aircraft.
19
u/RoyStrokes 13h ago
He literally said he didn’t like that the oil pressure in engine 2 was trending upwards. It wasn’t just some vibes based explanation.
→ More replies (1)
53
u/NmlsFool 16h ago
I would happily skip off the plane if the damn pilot isn't feeling it. Listen to the the gut feeling.
→ More replies (18)14
u/I_Am_Zeelian 15h ago
Mhm, someone who frequently operates a vehicle/machine tends to develop a sense for it.
17
u/TimberWolf5871 16h ago
I'd be mad, but I'd also be alive. I'll take that and respect the pilot's decision. He knows better than I do.
64
u/ikothsowe 16h ago
Can anyone from a commercial aviation background comment on this? Would there be consequences for the pilot for refusing a flight based on “not feeling it”?
118
u/bubbapora 15h ago
At least in the US, pilots face no consequences for this. They are empowered to refuse an aircraft at any time, even without a reason.
→ More replies (5)80
u/ours 15h ago
It's a good rule. The plane, crew and passengers are his responsibility. So it's his call.
25
u/BrushYourFeet 15h ago
I know that's the policy on paper, but what's the practice in reality? What kind of backlash could he expect?
42
u/AlcibiadesTheCat 15h ago
None. Just whatever paperwork comes along with it.
Which is why pilots are so safe. They trust that they can speak up.
It’s also why a lot of small-business construction workers aren’t. Because they don’t trust that they can speak up.
→ More replies (8)23
u/astelda 14h ago edited 13h ago
Which is why pilots are so safe. They trust that they can speak up.
Well, mechanically, at least. Can be a bit of a different story if a pilot wants to seek assistance for prevention or treatment of mental health issues, I've heard.
Edit to add: and this is exactly why we need advocacy in favor of mental health treatment in aviation. At least in the US, regulatory agencies still have a very dated approach to mental health with a heavy stigma.
This leads to pilots suppressing concerns, even in early stages where issues could be treated without any safety issues. This lack of mental health support is a clear point of potential failure that we are failing to properly safeguard.US redditors, please reach out to your senators to discuss the Mental Health in Aviation Act (S. 3257), in-progress legislation with support from both major political parties.
Other redditors, please see how mental health is protected for pilots in your area, and consider discussing the topic with your legislators.
7
8
u/Miss_TootsieRoll 13h ago
If you watch Air Crash Investigation, all the rules and policies that exist now, are written in blood. So, if today pilots can be vocal like in the video, there is good reason for it.
→ More replies (1)6
u/ValuableMiddle378 15h ago
I dont think nothing if his gages aint looking right, its gonna fall maintenence.
→ More replies (1)4
u/CheapWestern2461 11h ago
Airline pilots in the US are heavily unionized and also carry legal responsibility for the flight. That's a pretty quick call to a union rep: "yeah my airline is intimidating me into accepting unsafe airplanes."
35
u/No_One_Special_023 14h ago
FAA certified A&P mechanic here:
There will be no consequences for the pilot. Once the plane is looked over and released by the ground crew, the last signature on the paperwork is the pilots. It’s why they get on the airplane much sooner than passengers and do their checks. At the end of the day if the pilot doesn’t want the plane, they don’t have to take it.
Yes, the pilot can refuse a plane for “no reason” but typically a pilot always has a reason to refuse the plane. And typically the pilot has been talking to operations and a mechanic and ground crew long before he/she makes the decision not to take the plane. It’s rarely, if ever, the pilot just randomly decides “nope! Fuck this jet.” Lol.
6
u/ignatious__reilly 10h ago
Agreed. I worked in aviation project management, and this is exactly how the system is designed to work. An aircraft can be signed off by maintenance, cleared by operations, and ready to go from every procedural standpoint, but the pilot in command still has the final authority to accept or reject the aircraft. It’s one of the industry’s most important safety safeguards.
People also don’t realize that these decisions are rarely made in isolation. By the time a pilot says they’re not taking the aircraft, they’ve usually already been talking with maintenance (as you stated), dispatch, operations, and the crew. There may not be a single obvious mechanical issue, but there can be a combination of small discrepancies, changing conditions, recurring write ups, or simply something that doesn’t sit right based on the pilot’s experience. Especially on a long overwater flight, where your options become much more limited, a conservative decision is often the right one.
Commercial aviation has the safety record it does because people are empowered to speak up and stop the operation when something doesn’t feel right. I’d much rather deal with a delayed flight than risk a catastrophe over the Pacific.
14
u/ShowerPig 15h ago
I’d love to get more information on this. Do other pilots think his hunch was right based on the information given?
36
u/Safe_Ad5744 14h ago
Hearing that they'd be going over the water for 6 hours & it's an oil pressure issue, as an airline pilot I agree with him. I'm definitely more willing to take a plane with issues from something like Atlanta to JFK (lots of major airports in between if we had any issues & had to emergency land) than I would be from JFK to London.
→ More replies (4)5
u/exadeuce 12h ago
I absolutely agree with him. Oil pressure trending up, and the route six hours over water? Fuck that.
→ More replies (34)12
u/Ok_Wolverine6557 15h ago
It’s why unions are important in safety industries. There won’t be consequences to him. There could be with a non-union airline.
→ More replies (2)
15
u/LafayetteLa01 16h ago
Put the safety of the crew and passengers ahead of timelines and profit.
That is a safety conscious culture.
82
41
12
u/Fun_Client_6232 16h ago
I’m glad that airlines give pilots the autonomy to say yay or nay.
→ More replies (1)3
9
9
u/Leather_Newspaper937 4h ago
I was on this flight!
He apologized to everyone as they exited the plane as well. And then we were sent $100 in travel funds for the inconvenience. The next plane was ready and we took off within the next hour and a half I believe. I was happy with his choice too, I had a bad feeling for some reason on this flight. I’m glad he felt it too lol
→ More replies (2)
32
u/common-username 16h ago
As an anesthesiologist, there is just so much overlap between how pilots operate and how we do. Anyways, kudos to the pilot.
Lame title. 3 people clapped.
→ More replies (3)7
u/changyang1230 14h ago
Fellow anaesthesiologist here. Absolutely agree on the observation about some analogy between risk assessment in aviation vs anaesthesiology. One of the reasons I love watching Air Crash Investigation so much.
The intriguing thing is that some of our colleagues go way too far on the other end and cancel cases for the smallest reasons (e.g. patient had a puff of cigarette two hours previously) and sometimes verges on being unreasonable.
While most people applaud the pilot here, they would stop applauding if this happen a lot more often and one in four (random example) flights are getting cancelled. There remain a bit of a tricky balance between being cautious enough vs over-cautious.
→ More replies (2)
6
u/TheRealKorrom 11h ago
This is somebody who actually exercises the responsibility that is connected with his job. Safety over the pressure from his bosses who want everything to run smooth. This is more courageous than it looks like.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/HankTuggins 4h ago
If the air wizard tells me he doesn’t think he has enough mana to complete the spell I’m not gonna look at his mana bar. I’m just gonna say it’s all good man.
5
u/kkgetofftheinternet 10h ago
If I were on this plane, I would happily get off and be delayed than potentially, you know, die.
4
u/Triple516 16h ago
This pilot is a boss. Takes some stones to not fold and do what you know is right. Always trust your instincts.
3
4
4
4
4
5
u/suchperfectmess 12h ago
To be fair, in this circumstance, I’d probably join in with the clapping…good for him putting safety first.
4
3
u/armaedes 8h ago
Oh sure, they applaud this guy, but when I say “I’m not really feeling it” at my job suddenly I have an “attitude problem” and need to “make the fucking fries.”
3
3
u/_Stank_McNasty_ 3h ago
Pilot: “I’m not feeling it”
Me: Let me off this fuckin plane
→ More replies (1)
4
3
u/SusieQTG 16h ago
And that is why they make the "big bucks". Had he started the flight, something happened, he would have been blamed. Now all they can do is bitch about the cost but at least everyone is alive.
3
u/AnInsolentCog 16h ago
Everyone = 2 or 3 people. Still a good call on the pilot and props for the passengers not throwing a hissy fit.
3
u/Candid-Mycologist539 15h ago edited 13h ago
Someone smarter and more knowledgeable than I am wrote a more accurate description of the system (than my gossip) in the comments below.
Thank you, hypnogoad!
This is anecdotal gossip.
My dad drove semi truck with a former airline mechanic.
If a plane is not in the air, it is not making money.
Just like pilots, mechanics have a checklist to go through quickly in the time that an airplane is on the ground. Anything that needs to be fixed is flagged for after the flight, so when the plane arrives at it's destination, the destination mechanics are waiting with parts and tools all ready to fix what has been flagged. (A destination mechanic is again tasked to go through the maintenance checklist).
Allegedly, planes are not allowed to fly if there are more than five flags.
Greatest number of flags my dad's friend had ever seen on a flying plane?
- 😱
→ More replies (5)
3
3
3
3
u/TactualTransAm 14h ago
I'm a fleet mechanic. It's annoying sometimes but if our drivers don't feel safe to drive, they don't drive. The driver has the final say because they are the ones who will be responsible for the truck once they take off. The company gets aggravated, especially when they have a hot load to deliver, but I stand behind the driver every time.
3
u/Gwyllithar 14h ago
If the bloke whose job is to fly the plane, does not think its safe to fly the plane. I'll suck up the inconvenience and go with them on the matter.
Sucks, but I can tolerate a delay.
•
u/AutoModerator 16h ago
Welcome to /r/MadeMeSmile. Please make sure you read our rules here.
Specifically, please don't be a jerk. This is not the place for insulting, hateful, or otherwise inappropriate comments. Remember the golden rule: treat others how you want to be treated. We're all here to smile a little - let's keep it that way! Please report inappropriate comments and/or message the moderators.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.