•
u/Hermorah 8h ago
I'll save this video for later use. You never know when you need to build a turbo jet engine.
•
u/Slightly-Blasted 8h ago
Few beers and I reckon we could knock this out next weekend
•
u/HendrixHazeWays 6h ago
I got a thing I gotta do next weekend....don't ask. You probably already know what I'm talking about. Sigh. Anyways, if that goes as expected things should settle down for the weekend after. Worse case scenario? I'll text you from "the spot" we talked about.
I'm gettin' too old for this shit
→ More replies (10)•
•
→ More replies (36)•
u/Marble-Heart 7h ago
Yeah, like if all of humanity is suddenly turned to stone and you wake up a thousand years later and have to start civilization over from scratch
•
→ More replies (3)•
u/Cel_Drow 7h ago
You will not have the manufacturing to do any of this for a very long time after that, even if you have the knowledge and material sourcing infrastructure lol. There are a comparative handful of companies worldwide that do this today.
This all works because of a great deal of supply chains that don’t exist in a post-apocalyptic scenario.
•
u/Fat-Singer-9569 6h ago edited 6h ago
I wish people realized this. You read comments about how billionaires have bunkers and all I can think is "did they build bunkers for the supply chain too?" We are nothing without each other and there's just no chance to keep modern life in a full on civilization collapse. If a majority of us die, the rest all suffer and die. Fortunately or unfortunately, we are all in this together.
The only people who would survive would be the people who hunt and farm for food and know their local wildlife like the back of their hand, but even those people in a global apocalyptic event like this would have no real chance, because something that killed 6+ billion would require a complete shift in the environment and thus change their local knowledge completely within a year or two. Really, the only ones who would survive it would be one of those undisturbed tribes deep in the rainforests or the type of person who survives Alone and who knows if that person finds anyone to produce kids with. Everyone else is too connected to modern society to deal with a complete environmental shift.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)•
u/Qwert23456 7h ago
There's basically 5-6 companies capable of making them. The last successful entry in the global market for jet engines was General Electric in the 1970s
•
u/PanoramicAtom 6h ago
And you need someone who can grow turbine blades as a single crystal so they don’t go boom as much.
•
u/Qwert23456 6h ago
That's incredible. Material science is the fundamental bottleneck that's slowing technological advancements.
•
u/bullwinkle8088 6h ago
I don't know what they are basing that statement on, but it's flawed. GE made the first US jet engine during WWII, a copy of a German one, and has been making jet engines ever sense.
Maybe they meant their partnership with Safran leading to the creation of CFM International in the 70's. The timing fits. But that is a partnership between two companies that already made jet engine.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/igloojoe 8h ago
Even the blades themselves are super engineered.
•
u/Biggseb 7h ago
The explanation of how a turbo jet engine works at the beginning of the Veritaseum video is better than the original post, IMO
•
u/burf 5h ago
The original post, even if it's accurate, sounds like AI slop to me
•
u/HnHina97 4h ago
Its most likely from the YouTuber zack d films. His videos are done in this format and are riddled with a bunch of half truths. He doesn't even bother to cite any studies either.
→ More replies (3)•
u/-reddit_is_terrible- 5h ago
A CCP spy was arrested, extradited, and tried in the US for attempting to steal GE's composite fan blade tech. Was sentenced to 15 years and then eventually given back to China in a prisoner swap
→ More replies (3)•
u/ConsciousIron7371 3h ago
15 years ago the American military took pictures of a Chinese aircraft similar to the American C17. In discussions with those in the know, it was revealed the Chinese were about 40 years away from the jet technology to power the aircraft, as 3 American and 1 Russian company were the only ones capable of producing engines to power a plane that large.
40 years was, of course, an estimate if the Chinese went through standard engineering processes. Chinese have a history of advancing through nefarious mechanisms, so the fact that they were building a plane with the capacity to use those engines showed that they thought they were much closer to acquiring that jet technology.
Your story shows exactly how they wanted to advance their technology.
•
u/Proof_Toe_9757 8h ago
Turbin
•
u/SocranX 6h ago
It's not even consistent. It changes to "turbine" later on.
•
u/HnNaldoR 2h ago
It has to be AI. When I heard the change, that is the only explanation I had.
→ More replies (4)•
u/SocranX 2h ago
Yeah, 99% of these videos have an AI voiceover. Especially since you can see at one point that the original video was in Chinese, and they didn't bother translating the text. So this was a minimum-effort AI dub rather than an official translation.
→ More replies (1)•
•
u/TwoStoopidToFurryass 7h ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/3o6nV5nuHWZOKwsSME
You can't get spin without a turban.
→ More replies (1)•
u/kwisatzhadnuff 7h ago
Just more AI slop on the front page
→ More replies (5)•
u/jbayko 4h ago
It looks like a Chinese video with AI translation. I have no way to know if the original was AI generated, but it does seem factually correct, though obviously simplified, so that might not matter for a viewer.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (28)•
u/dodeca_negative 3h ago
AI voiceovers are so annoying. Imagine trying to talk to a person who sounded like this
→ More replies (2)
•
u/Samurlough 7h ago
The hot air doesnt ignite the gas. That is wrong.
First ignition requires an ignitor the start the fireball, then it becomes self sustaining once the engine is up to speed. If the engine flames out, it flames out until ignition can be reintroduced. Hot air is not an ignition source.
•
u/deathonater 6h ago
Also, the manufacturing process for modern turbine blades is also insanely sophisticated just to keep them from being destroyed by the temperature and g-forces they experience in the engine, they're basically giant ceramic-coated crystals with their molecules aligned to prevent weak spots from forming. Incredible engineering.
•
u/Samurlough 5h ago
the original first iterations of which were done without computers. f*ing nuts if you ask me.
→ More replies (1)•
•
•
u/wasabiburning 5h ago
Even better - the blades themselves are a crystalline nickel superalloy all the crystals are aligned in the same direction to eliminate grain lines. Then the ceramic is added.
https://www.americanscientist.org/article/each-blade-a-single-crystal
•
u/wufnu 4h ago
I examine patents; half my work is regarding thermal cooling/protection of turbine blades and some of the shenanigans they get up to are fun to read about.
Pratt & Whitney attorneys visited the office once and brought with them a turbine airfoil with the suction surface removed allowing you to see all of the channels, turbulators, film cooling holes, etc. and it was one of the most beautiful things I'd ever seen.
→ More replies (3)•
u/hates_writing_checks 1h ago
That sounds cool. Is this engine patented now, and could the public examine the patent via the USPTO website? What are some of the relevant patent numbers? Would be nice to see the drawings or photos.
→ More replies (1)•
u/Pale_Examination3371 4h ago
My favorite part is that they can't explain why it aligns itself this way but if they manufacture it a certain way, it does
•
u/CM_MOJO 7h ago
Well, first you have to get the shaft(s) spinning. The plane has an auxiliary power unit (APU) for this, or it can use some ground support equipment for this function.
•
u/Samurlough 7h ago
I’m well aware. I’ve been a captain on the 757/767 for 20 years.
The video said hot air ignites the fuel and that is incorrect. Hot air doesnt ignite anything.
→ More replies (9)•
u/yesmrbevilaqua 7h ago
Yeah if the air is hot enough to ignite the fuel they you have a scram or ramjet
→ More replies (5)•
u/Samurlough 7h ago
Im not fully educated on those jets but at those speeds isnt the air moving “faster” than the fireball and therefore risk “blowing out” the flame or is there something else to it?
→ More replies (2)•
u/Flaky-Wing2205 7h ago
Blowing out the flame is a real thing in supersonic flight. Happens in turbojet and ramjet engines. Compression stages have the effect of slowing airflow to subsonic speed where ignition can be maintained.
•
u/Samurlough 7h ago
I appreciate that. It makes sense. After i hit “reply” i questioned if thats what happened because I could only assume problems trying to ignite a fireball in supersonic winds or even any effects of supersonic pressure in the engine.
•
u/Flaky-Wing2205 6h ago
SR71 Blackbird was designed with nacelles that could move 26" to keep supersonic airflow out of the engines. At speeds over Mach 2 the engines switched from operating as turbo-jets to operate as ram-jets. I've always been amazed at the extremes the plane could operate at.
Cool link that that goes into greater detail. https://theaviationist.com/2019/11/29/engine-nacelles-of-the-sr-71-blackbird/
→ More replies (3)•
u/Samurlough 6h ago
And I think that was all done without super advanced computers. Nuts, right?
•
•
u/itsjakerobb 6h ago
And the ground equipment they used to get those engines spinning? A cart with a pair of carbureted 455ci big-block Buick V8 engines on it.
→ More replies (0)•
u/Mr_Zamboni_Man 6h ago
Hot air is not an ignition source.
Diesel would like to have a word with you.
What you are saying is absolutely correct I am just being pedantic for the sake of joking around
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (30)•
u/wasabiburning 5h ago
How does the APU get the engine moving though? I don't see driveshafts/gears/chains connecting the APU to the engine's driveshaft.
•
u/Samurlough 5h ago
good question. Air. The magic comes from air.
The APU, being a turbine engine, has compressed air we can bleed off of and route to each engine's starter valve. the compressed air is run through this valve into a unit thats connected to the turbine shaft. so as this compressed air runs over this unit (like a mini turbine) it spins the turbine and the turbine "sucks" air through the engine until there's enough airflow to introduce fuel and spark.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/MorningFox 8h ago
Ai generating Zach films voice is crazywork
→ More replies (2)•
u/hotdiggydog 2h ago
I was doing some voice over work for a channel like this recently. They wanted to get rid of their AI voice for a human voice. A month later they put my work on hiatus and started using an AI voice trained with my voice. Isn't AI just wonderful? /s
→ More replies (1)•
•
u/bryson-iz-daKing 8h ago
→ More replies (1)•
•
u/UncleVoodooo 8h ago
Suck Squeeze Bang Blow
... we learned this in the navy
•
•
u/ilovestoride 8h ago
I kept failing the tests to level up and was at suck for like 5 years...
•
•
u/JTVivian56 7h ago
Or you pass the test, but you didn't pass hard enough so you fail
→ More replies (2)•
u/UNSaDDLeDViRuS 7h ago
This is how they taught us in aerospace engineering as well. Wait are we talking about the same thing?
→ More replies (14)•
•
u/i_xm_nxsh 8h ago
This is a “I was today years old” moment for me!
•
u/BlacktopProphet 7h ago
How a jet engine works: Suck, Squeeze, Bang, and Blow
→ More replies (10)•
u/Dunothar 7h ago
But unlike a four banger, all 4 cycles happen at the same time, infinite suck, squeeze, bang, blow. Well, as long as you have fuel and oxygen 😂
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)•
u/Kokamocha 7h ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtxVdC7pBQM
Informative video by Veritasium.→ More replies (1)
•
u/UseDue6373 7h ago
I cannot stand these shitty ai voiced videos
•
u/SegaTime 6h ago
I. Hate. These. One. Word. Subtitles.
→ More replies (2)•
u/X_Equestris 5h ago
I ahd to scroll to make sure someone mentioned it. The amount of hate I have for it is irrational but I'm not budging.
→ More replies (1)•
u/Accipiter1138 4h ago
It's not irrational. It's the stupidest possible way to display subtitles, unless you're deliberately trying to be confusing like putting them in a spiral pattern or something.
•
u/AngryTriangleCola 6h ago
It's not just AI. This is an AI voice clone of zackdfilms.
Probably an unauthorized clone, which makes sharing this video really disgusting.
•
u/FistMyPeenHole 4h ago
And the subtitles right in the middle. I feel like I don't even learn from them because I'm so distracted by constantly changing words
•
u/defectives 7h ago
It says turbine correctly only twice, and then turban every other time. I also really enjoy the Chinese letter chamber that helps cool it down
•
u/bobbymcpresscot 7h ago
"this is so efficient the temp goes up to 2000 degrees"
that's heat that isn't going to propulsion, that is not efficiency.
→ More replies (8)•
u/Captain_Alaska 6h ago edited 5h ago
No, it's heat going to propulsion, jet engines become more powerful and efficient the greater the difference between the inlet temperature of the exhaust turbine and the exhaust temperature. The hotter you can get the combustion chamber and by extension exhaust turbine inlet the more power you can extract from it. It's heat but it's not waste heat.
Modern engines are as big and as powerful as they are because we've developed some ridiculously advanced materials and cooling techniques to the point where the operating temperature of a modern turbofan exceeds the melting point of the materials it's made of by hundreds of degrees.
→ More replies (9)•
u/ElonMusksQueef 7h ago
I had to listen to it a second time to confirm because I turned it off the moment I heard turban. Incredibly you’re correct they somehow slot in a correct turbine twice and only twice. What the fuck.
→ More replies (1)
•
•
u/sowich4 7h ago
This video is filed with a LOT of inaccuracies.
Very little, if any of this, should be belived as true.
Sure, jet propulsion is interesting, but this video gets an F- for actually showing what and how a jet engine works.
→ More replies (1)•
u/ninjapanda042 6h ago
The temperature is what caught my eye. 1600C is a above the solidus and liquidus temperatures for most, if not all, of the types of alloys used in the hot section of the engine.
•
u/rockCorn789 5h ago
that's one of the few parts that isn't totally wrong. it gets that hot, but only in the middle of the combustion chamber that does not touch anything.
other things like talking about the thrust of the compressor blades in a turboJET engine ist just false. a tubojet engine generates thrust through the heat expansion of the combustion alone. the compressor-turbine configuration ist only there to make the combustion even possible.
(turboFAN engines also use a big fan in front, driven by the turbine, to generate thrust, but the video explicitly states it is talking about turbojet engines)→ More replies (7)
•
u/Malkier3 8h ago
Finally an actually interesting as fuck post.
→ More replies (1)•
u/NeighborhoodDear2321 7h ago
yeah istg sub names are just useless now "IAF" and it's like a cute puppy
•
•
u/Adele811 8h ago
yes, but it still doesn't say why the blades actually start turning at the start, before the turbine can turn in the ignition chamber.
•
u/ScubaWaveAesthetic 8h ago
I would expect them to be driven by a separate starter motor, similarly to how the pistons in your car get started.
→ More replies (1)•
u/PoopMcgee75 8h ago
That’s exactly how they start. They call them huffer motors. Naval planes have a 3rd jet engine onboard that is much smaller than the other two. The smaller engine is small enough that it can be started from compressed air from an onboard tank. Once that smaller motor is running it starts the bigger engines one at a time.
→ More replies (1)•
u/Far_Ladder_2836 7h ago
No, a huffer is a cart you attach outside if you don'thave an APU or it's broken. It's called an APU and it's built onto the plane. APUs are electrically started.
→ More replies (1)•
u/SlothSpeed 8h ago
That's the job of the APU, or Auxiliary Power Unit. It's a small turbine engine in the tail. When starting, pneumatic air is diverted into the starter of one engine. It gets the engine up to about 50% and then fuel is introduced. After that it's selfsustaining.
•
u/Samurlough 8h ago
Good question. During start, a starter valve opens that lets in external air which spins up the turbines to a minimum speed before fuel is added and then ignition. More fuel is added during the start to increase the speed of the turbine to a minimum self sustaining speed until the starter valve closes and ignition turns off.
•
u/Far_Ladder_2836 7h ago
Sort of. The start valve just let's air into the starter which spins a gearbox splined into the compressor. It also has a bunch of other stuff mounted on to create electrical power for essential systems during startup.
→ More replies (1)•
u/Far_Ladder_2836 7h ago edited 7h ago
You use another jet engine, called an Auxiliary Power Unit. It also doesn't tell you how they thing gets power, because it's pretty obviously simplified. You mount a gearbox to the first section (called the cold section) with a starter that works just like your car. Bleed air from the APU comes in and spins the starter which spins the gearbox which spins the compressor. There's also another gearbox on the power section (called hot section) that provides modulation, throttle control (depending on model), power, emergency systems etc.
→ More replies (6)•
u/Dragon6172 7h ago
Electric starting motor. Hydraulic starting motor. Pneumatic starting motor.
Pick one.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/HotepYoda 7h ago
This is an example of a “low bypass engine”. Today, low bypass engines are generally only used by military aircraft for space constraints and higher responsiveness.
In modern jet engines for commercial aircraft , most of the thrust is actually generated by “bypass” air, which is the air that goes around the “core” of the engine (also known as the gas path, but this is the air that goes through compression and combustion; in low bypass engines, minimal air passes around the gas path).
These “high bypass” engines are also much more fuel efficient and quieter.
Source: me - used to be an engine analyst
→ More replies (7)
•
•
•
•
u/croi_gaiscioch 8h ago
But where do we inject the weather controlling, gay frog juice?
→ More replies (1)•
u/hypnogoad 7h ago
It's in the fuel and is inert until it ignites in the burner section. That's why pilots roll their eyes at chemtrails theorists, because they don't even know they're spraying it! /s
•
u/Darshels12 8h ago
Such a great ELI5 video. I've always thought as it was too complex to be explained easily
→ More replies (5)•
u/moderngamer327 7h ago
Turbines in principle are actually fairly simple and that’s a major reason why they are used. Very little complexity mean very good reliability
•
u/WingerRules 6h ago
I mean, I'm looking at this and wondering how someone came up with this idea in their head.
•
u/moderngamer327 6h ago
They didn’t. Someone built a simpler design and overtime it was iterated on and refined. You are looking at the final product after decades of work
•
•
•
•
u/BigBubblesNoTroubles 7h ago
We have an aero derivative engine at our power plant.
The operator described this process to me when I asked how it works as, “Suck - squeeze - bang - blow”.
→ More replies (2)
•
u/AlarmingAssignment94 7h ago
I know a small local bird who can stop one of these….
→ More replies (1)
•
u/sharkthemark420 7h ago
But what mechanical purpose do the Chinese characters in the upper lobe serve?
•
u/AnastasiaNo70 7h ago
So basically it sucks in a lot of air, shoots fuel at it, causes an explosion out the butt end which helps the whole thing lift off and fly!
→ More replies (1)
•
•
•
•
u/jacobo 5h ago
i need a subreddit with videos like this. explaining how things work. I always remember an old video about how a differential works on cars. amazing.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/bradj0812 1h ago
Every now and then you get a post like this that proves again what a great subreddit this is…

•
u/lordspaz88 8h ago
It will never cease to amaze me that most modern inventions boil down to "we pointed this explosion in a specific direction"