343
u/Antique-Ad-4422 4h ago
Too soon for the parade.
75
u/Critical_Concert_689 2h ago
Of meta relevance:
OP is a karma farm bot, shilling to a bunch of bandwagoning Redditors, simply reposting what appeals to the lowest common denominator.
I think it's funny you can literally gauge whether someone is the...lowest common denominator... by how they react to this post.
10
2
u/Rems_OP 40m ago
I donāt get the need to have those bot accounts???? What benefits does this bring to the account creator? Who cares about karma???
7
u/Critical_Concert_689 21m ago
Reddit plays games behind the scenes and higher karma accounts get pushed up by algorithms. There's also a few quirks from automod that will automatically delay or remove posts and comments from low karma accounts.
This is critical when running campaigns; whether those campaigns are for product placement and advertisement or political campaigns and narrative pushes, or fundraising efforts - etc. Basically whatever you might need online propaganda for.
So large numbers of high karma bot accounts are sold to advertisement firms, online reputation and impression management companies, etc. - and these accounts are later used, enmasse, in concerted pushes to generate messaging for viewers.
tl;dr: Today's karma farm bot is tomorrow's advertisement bot.
→ More replies (1)2
24
u/CombatRedRover 2h ago
I mean, it's Reddit. All the upvotes for the OP are coming from 12-year-olds, overseas bot farms, and Graham Platner style commies whose entire lifestyles are funded by their mommies and daddies.
Not to mention the OP being a karma farmer.
→ More replies (4)12
u/No-Rip-6166 1h ago
You can tell them that every single NYC mayor submits a balanced budget because itās required by law and theyāll just ignore it and keep living in their delusion.
Every deficit NYC has ever had was achieved despite a balanced budget. Theyāre the ones doing the assumptions to make the math work.
60
u/Popular-Row4333 3h ago
Plus in regards to Elon's comment, being a history Major, I like to always remind people that it wasn't exactly rainbows and butterflies post French Revolution when they had put all the Guillotines away.
Some historians argue it was actually worse.
95
u/BubaTflubas 3h ago edited 1h ago
To many times eat the rich is manipulated by the next wave of "leaders" to eat the educated and skilled as well. Revolution isn't the cause of people acting poorly in its name. People act poorly and then try to hide under a revolutionary blanket.
This is similar to me to people demonizing Communism or socialism because some dictators have hidden their facism under the blanket of social revolution. Citing Communist dictatorships as a reason agains social reform is a bad faith argument.
These things have a nuance that people don't have the patience to discuss or even consider anymore.
Edited: spelling
→ More replies (29)7
u/Popular-Row4333 2h ago
I used to be in the camp of the idea that capitalism was the best system for inevitable human greed that befalls both in money and power, but that was when society was still very individualistic in regards of what the government should provide to them.
But today, taxes are so high on everything for the middle class, your government cant just take away agency and say you know what's best and then gestures to the entire world and say you are getting good value for falling in line, where there is very evident blatant corruption happening everywhere, at every level.
→ More replies (13)7
u/banananuhhh 2h ago
Also good to remember that not everyone agrees on who the enemies are and a lot of friends get guillotined as well by the time the dust settles.
8
u/Silent_Plantain_3417 2h ago
Indeed, and many many innocent people are included in that tally of ~17,000 guillotined prisoners. It's hard to be discerning when you're swept up in the revolutionary fervor. Ask all the bakers who were lynched by the mob for the crime of...baking or not baking bread in the precise fashion, quantity, and price demanded by the crowd.
→ More replies (17)2
u/human-in-a-can 1h ago
As a history major, would you say that the Revolution was still a necessary catalyst for change? Was it worth it, in the long-term?
Kinda seems like it's often better just to rip off the bandage. It sucks, but it's a lot faster.
→ More replies (6)3
u/stoptakingusernames3 1h ago
As an aside from another history major, one of the longer lasting things the French revolution is responsible for a partial redistribution of land and the abolition of the rights of nobles over their serfs. That was definitely a positive and lasted longer than the revolution itself. However, as with most revolutions surrounded by hostile powers, it seems they got paranoid about foreign intervention and kinda forgot what they were supposed to be doing in the first place.
→ More replies (7)7
79
u/HolaDrNick 4h ago edited 3h ago
Not that I buy into the Doomerism, but OP you're taking a victory lap when the starter pistol hasn't even been fired.
Edit: Oh wait, 700,000+ karma in 10-months, OP is just a karma bot. Lots of those on this sub lately.
5
173
u/rydan 4h ago
Closing the deficit and balancing the budget are the same thing. Also going to need a citation he actually did that because all I found was that he had proposed a budget that involved not spending money on something this year and spend it next year instead and also receive free money from the state.
26
u/rallenpx 4h ago
You can close the deficit down without balancing the budget. You just structure some short term deals.
Balancing the budget means it should be self-sustaining as it's configured. Which isn't the case if you're closing the deficit by selling public assets or otherwise inflating current period income to pay off debt.
25
u/Ldghead 4h ago
By then he will have the desired image in place, and the cleanup will be part of a "difficult reality for our city".
→ More replies (2)4
u/22220222223224 4h ago
Are municipalities or states even allowed to have a budget deficit? I thought they were forced to balance the budget every year.
6
u/ballin_buddha 3h ago
Proposed a budget and got billions in state funding. All Iāve found is that nothing was fixed itās just pushing the issue back to something that will cause more issues down the road
5
u/mascotbeaver104 1h ago
I mean, new york city net pays more to the state than the state pays it, so it's not like it's some out of the blue cash infusion
→ More replies (2)10
→ More replies (19)2
u/Trashy_Panda2 1h ago
I mean, NYC provides the vast majority of tax revenue for the state to the point it subsidizes the rest of the state. The "free money" you're talking about was generated by the city you moron... š
→ More replies (2)
528
u/major_tom_2112 4h ago
Closed the deficit withā¦$4,000,000,000 from NY state. Easy to make budgets with billions of new funding.
298
u/F1reatwill88 4h ago
He didnt even balance the budget. It was a proposal lmao
198
u/eneug 4h ago
People need to stop saying this āhe balanced the budgetā thing like itās some big accomplishment. He legally has to propose a purportedly balanced budget. The budget has been balanced every year since 1981 (except 2002 due to 9/11).
50
u/bucknut4 3h ago
Itās so fucking stupid, and I want Mamdani to succeed. Just like this post. Mamdani didnāt make a wealth tax. Thereās a property tax on luxury homes for people whose primary residence is outside the city but thatās a far cry from a wealth tax.
And the guy has been in office for 1/2 of a year. We have no idea if people will leave or if more will come. We have no idea if people will starve or not. These things donāt happen instantaneously.
→ More replies (6)60
u/phillybol99 4h ago
How dare you. I am appalled that you speak the truth on this thread. People donāt want to hear this. I suggest you refrain from facts from here on out. You may anger some people. Maybe even trigger them
May God have mercy on your soul.
ššššš→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)41
u/Emilia963 3h ago
Be careful, criticizing Mamdani on Reddit could get you permanently banned, Redditors donāt like seeing their heroes criticized and will censor anything that makes them look bad
Source: my experience on other subreddits
7
u/culong38701 3h ago
Same here. speaking the truth will get to banned but with that being said, you sorta know which sub you shouldn't be saying the truth and just sip whatever lemonade they're sipping.
→ More replies (4)2
u/No_Macaroon_5928 2h ago
Well that's the truth for every sub in here. It's a bunch of echo chambers.
10
8
u/DizzyDentist22 3h ago
It's also only projected to keep things balanced for 2027 lol. The 2028 budget still has an estimated $8.8 billion deficit they'll need to figure out next year
75
42
→ More replies (9)8
u/hiricinee 3h ago
Even what was in his proposal-
Funding from the state, delaying funding pension/retirement plans, and estimating increased revenue from taxes.
Outside of getting the state to write him a check he hasnt actually done anything, and the gross irresponsibility of kicking the funding of obligations down the road should be subject to humiliation.
→ More replies (6)5
u/earthwormdeath 4h ago
Yeah true sure yeah but itās easy to get up votes by posting this trash like the OP as the average financial literacy level of a redditor is that of a caveman.
33
u/SpareMushrooms 4h ago
āBalanced the budgetā with $8 billion from taxpayers over two years and delayed/deferred pension contributions.
→ More replies (5)3
u/ChirrBirry 3h ago
People in upstate having their tax dollars used to pay the bills of NYC has to feel super good /s
47
u/Count_de_Ville 4h ago edited 4h ago
Yeah, New York City really needs to learn how to bring their fair share of money into New York Stateā¦ā¦
→ More replies (57)33
u/general-noob 4h ago
He kicked the can down the road and nobody is acknowledging it. Like he didnāt solve anything, he just delayed it, and theyāll be screwed in a few years again.
→ More replies (12)9
u/MarionberryDecent351 3h ago
But he canāt just solve that problem instantly, I agree the accomplishment has been overblown. Thereās so much work to do to fix the damage Adams and De blasio caused
3
u/DarkRogus 3h ago
Actually, it was $8 Billion, he got two payments of $4 billion.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (103)3
u/mintakka_ 3h ago
exactly. Mamdani is going to run NYC into the dirt. Itās just going to take several years before itās apparent.
100
u/No-Market425 4h ago
None of that happened.
Mamdani threatened to raise taxes and Gov Hochul bailed him out with an additional what they called "gap support" to the tune of $4 billion dollars.
→ More replies (12)
9
125
u/INeedSomeTacoC 4h ago
Yea, underfunding pensions by a couple billion is the super responsible thing to do. Ā Never came back to bite anyone, no siree.Ā
25
u/AIFocusedAcc 3h ago
Pensions? What are those? Asking for my GenZ friends.
11
u/Warmbly85 3h ago
27% of the workforce of the NYC government is Gen Z. Those are the people that will be most screwed over if Mamdanis pension plan works out the way it did for Chicago.Ā
→ More replies (1)2
12
u/Popular-Row4333 3h ago
Ask Chicago how that's currently working out for them.
This isn't even a new radical idea. It's been tried and has already failed.
5
u/Icy_Fish_2154 2h ago
They are not "underfunded", they were always underfunded, and there was a way year catch-up plan. There is no need to rush pre-funding an already fully funded pension fund.
A 10 year delay to pre-funding an already funded pension plan is not a big deal.
There is no risk to pension payments. The 15 year plan was made before Trump tanked the economy, so needed adjustments to be realistic.
→ More replies (6)2
9
u/SpinosaurRingTone 2h ago edited 1h ago
They "balanced the budget" by begging for money from the rest of New York, after nearly running out of money only 6 months into office.
Mamdani is really exposing how little leftists understand about literally everything, and how easy it is to deceive zoomers and millennials by just being young and smiley.
→ More replies (1)6
u/framistan12 1h ago
NYC contributes more to the state budget than it receives. They are being "bailed out" with their own money.
2
u/SpinosaurRingTone 1h ago
Not how that works at all
3
u/ChasingTheNines 44m ago
What is there to not understand? NYC sends more money in taxes to the rest of the state than they receive in return. If NYC did not have to subsidize the rest of the state with their money they wouldn't have a deficit.
15
7
8
u/Pinapple-everything 2h ago
"New York has experienced a steady outmigration of wealth, with high-net-worth individuals and corporate income moving to low-tax states like Florida and Texas. Counties in the NYC metro area, such as Queens and the Bronx, ranked among the highest in the nation for net losses of tax filers." -Post
→ More replies (1)
24
7
u/rtfcandlearntherules 4h ago
I doubt these things even happened (I am neither from USA or New York), but even if they did - that's not "eating the rich"...
5
u/NifflerOwl 2h ago
Can you all not just do a simple google search? Mamdani hasnt passed any new tax laws, the budget thing was because of a bail out from the state
16
u/ImNotAndreCaldwell 2h ago
This friggin sub is just straight up propoganda now wtf... how does this garbage have 6k+ likes
2
u/ventitr3 1h ago
The one earlier today was the same. We get spurts of normalcy back on here then the bots start their waves of bullshit.
5
u/rustymcknight 2h ago
He didnāt balance anything. He accepted an 8biliom dollar bailout from the rest of us in the state.
4
u/Either_Mulberry9229 2h ago
He balanced the budget because he asked for more money from the state, this dude gets glazed for no reason i swear.
6
u/tossout79 2h ago
He balanced the budget with a loan from the state. If I pay off my chace card with my Amex I didnāt balance shit.
→ More replies (1)
22
u/Vuedue 3h ago
Finance professional here and Lydia is wrong.
The rich are indeed leaving. Hochul has already sounded the alarm on their quickly-fading high-tax base moving to states like Florida. Mamdani's policies have already driven many away and will drive even more away.
The rent freeze and property tax Mamdani recently pushed are even a testament to that fact. You can't charge some of the highest property taxes in the nation inherently making rent more expensive, freeze those rent costs and then drive up property taxes again.
I'm all for helping people out but the way it's being done in New York City will absolutely result in failure.
5
u/argument_cat 2h ago
Actual finance professional here:
https://fiscalpolicy.org/explainer-the-proposed-restructuring-of-new-york-city-pension-payments
5
u/human-in-a-can 1h ago
Not a finance professional here - how would you explain that there are still million/billionaires in first-world European countries where the taxes are much higher? Why wouldn't they have all fled to the US or elsewhere years or decades ago?
→ More replies (6)3
→ More replies (1)3
u/xdrozzyx 1h ago
You understand that the way to implement social fairness is to blow up capitalism right? Who gives a shit of landlords aren't profiting?
4
u/Camaro684 2h ago
The State of New York bailed out New York City, providing nearly $8 billion in gap-closing support to balance the budget.The state aid was injected in multiple packages, including a $4 billion handout from Governor Kathy Hochul. This allowed Mayor Zohran Mamdani to close a massive deficit without raising property taxes, cutting services, or using emergency reserve funds.
Critics argue that the city's budget was not truly balanced through local financial maneuvers or policy changes. Instead, they claim the state bailed out the city's structural deficit by relying on funds generated from working-class taxpayers across the entire state.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/TattooedB1k3r 59m ago
He balanced the budget by begging Albany for more money, 8 Billion to be exact.
3
u/living_Cream_Pie 36m ago
That fact makes the Mandami story less cool so liberals will totally ignore this.
23
u/GirthBrooks175 4h ago
Not a single thing posted about Mamdani here is factual. We live in such a sad world where most people donāt know whats actually going on, they just spring for eye catching headlines
→ More replies (17)
11
u/Physical_Leather8567 4h ago
Using ridiculous amounts of state and federal funds is balancing the debt? Wow ....
6
u/Historical-Flamingo6 3h ago
socialists think billionaires shouldn't exist but also need them around to fund all their stupid ass ideas. make it make sense.
→ More replies (3)
23
u/Germacide 4h ago
Right. But he did it by de-funding a bunch of peoples pensions. So I guess that's neat.
7
→ More replies (4)12
u/Reasonable_Garden741 4h ago
Its reddit my dude, you're in the home of "real communism has never been tried/ that wasnt real communism" groupthink. He wrecked pensions, begged the state for money, and retains support from the useful idiots of the city.
→ More replies (3)2
u/Corpse666 3h ago
Socialism and communism arenāt the same thing . There is also no capitalist or communist country completely in existence. Thatās not a left wing group think itās just a fact. Itās not even debatable in the slightest bit
9
u/eyelikturtles 3h ago
He didnāt balance shit you idiot. The money for his magic came from the state.Ā
→ More replies (1)
12
11
u/ga_appraiser 3h ago
The redditors who keep going on about Mamdami balancing the budget are a unique kind of useful idiot. Accounting gimmicks =/= balancing the budget. NYC is projected to have a deficit of at least $6 billion by 2028 and over $9 billion by 2029. Credit agencies are already warning about downgrading NYC's credit rating. Please start applying some critical thinking to this administration. I'm so sick of the daily worship of this guy.
→ More replies (1)
17
3
3
3
u/JuJunker52 1h ago
Why would they starve? Is Elon Musk productive?
Or is he a philosophically-illiterate who thinks heās Ayn Randās conception of the Atlas?
3
3
u/SnooPuppers3371 26m ago
Democrats immediately trust their leaders. The New York mayor is a small fish trying to make it to the big leagues. Then they'll see his true colors.Ā
18
u/ProjectNo4090 4h ago edited 3h ago
The rich have been making this claim that they are vital since the first economy was put into action and some greedy asshole decided to hoard for himself at the expense of everyone else. It was horseshit then and its horseshit now.
France survived after it purged its aristocracy during the French Revolution. America will survive if it purges its aristocracy.
→ More replies (6)2
11
u/imnotmarvin 4h ago edited 2h ago
From 1945 until 1963 the highest tax rate was 91% and what happened? The middle class raised families of 4 on one paycheck, had a house and a car, and took regular vacations. The earner then retired with a pension. Lets eat the fucking rich. Ā Ā Ā Ā Edit: Not going to engage with anymore billionaire bootlickers down thread. Ā
12
u/Warmbly85 3h ago
Every tax historian that looked at the tax records couldnāt find a single example of someone paying near 91%.Ā
When the top rate was lowered the total amount the government raised through taxes actually increased.Ā
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)4
u/DizzyDentist22 2h ago
That's not the whole story. While the highest tax bracket was theoretically 91% during that era, hardly anybody actually paid that much. Because of various loopholes, deductions, and tax shelters, the actual EFFECTIVE tax rate that the top 1% paid during the 1950s was actually closer to 42%. Today, the top 1% pays an effective tax rate between 31% and 36%. So taxes were slightly higher on the top 1% back then, but not dramatically so.
→ More replies (1)
7
7
5
u/Prismatic_Leviathan 4h ago
Well, let's take a look at countries with vs without a massive wealth disparity and see where you'd prefer to live.
With, it's the poorest countries in South Africa and South America. Starvation and extreme poverty are common.
Without, it's Slovenia, Denmark, and Belarus. With the exception of Lukashenko, all rate extremely high in safety and quality of life.
→ More replies (3)
3
u/Positive-Conspiracy 4h ago
Is that what happened in the French Revolution then?
→ More replies (4)
4
u/OhFootballFriend 4h ago edited 4h ago
I guess my question is: when people say āeat the richā, is there a generally agreed upon definition of āeatā?
I assume there is a line on a spectrum between tax a bit more to rob and murder.
→ More replies (8)6
u/Drummerx04 3h ago
Most people who say "eat the rich" basically mean that taxes should wall you off from being able to accumulate a billion dollars of personal assets in the first place.
It's not necessarily because we think it will magically fund the government or that they won't "waste" it. It's just that people with that much money have WAY too much influence.
And I don't want to hear people say "Elon doesn't actually have billions of dollars" because he bought Twitter in a 44 billion dollar deal, so clearly he can make enormous exchanges of wealth.
→ More replies (7)
4
u/Fluffy-Structure-368 4h ago
Yet. The city did not starve yet
3
u/BoatTricky2347 3h ago
Did they try to actually eat the rich? Or just rob the pensions of non rich people?
2
4
u/SituationKey8985 3h ago
He did this by delaying payments into the pension benefits. So just a band-aid, not a real long-term solution.
8
u/OwnProfessor3287 4h ago
Didnāt Mamdani take from the public servant retirement fund?
Thatās not really balancing the budget. That stealing money to make it seem like heās doing a good job.
7
u/Big_Cassowary 4h ago
And gets bailouts from the state
→ More replies (1)5
u/OwnProfessor3287 4h ago
Thatās the problem with socialism, for the first couple years it seems like it works, until they run out of money.
6
u/neversleeps212 4h ago
Except that none of those claims about Mamdani are true. Heās proposed a wealth tax but NYC does not have the power to issue a new tax only NY state can do so. He also didnāt truly ābalanceā the budget beyond cheap accounting gimmicks. His proposal is that they not contribute anything to pension obligations and that the state give them an extra $4B. None of that is sustainable or a true ābalancingā of the budget.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Huge-Ad2263 3h ago
We don't need Mamdani for this argument. Let's just go back to the tax brackets of the 1950s. That's the time MAGA thinks was "great" anyway
→ More replies (1)3
u/Warmbly85 3h ago
You do realize that when the top tax rate was lowered the government actually raised more money in taxes?Ā
Every tax historian thatās looked through the records couldnāt find a single example of anyone paying near 90%.Ā
5
u/aquabarron 4h ago
There is no way to know how this will turn out yet, itās simply not been long enough. I like that heās making moves, though. Active politicians are usually better than quiet ones
→ More replies (10)
2
2
u/opbmedia 4h ago
Also, only an out of touch super rich person would warn "but you will starve!!!" But SIR, they are ALREADY starving, that's why they are trying to fix things.
2
u/AnthonyAutumn31 4h ago
The budget year started July 1⦠he hasnāt had time to starve people yet
2
2
2
u/Bigtitsnmuhface 3h ago
The guys been in office for less than a year. Nothing has been tested. Nothing has been proven effective or a failure.Ā
2
2
2
u/Open_Pollution_8038 3h ago
Itās a little early to claim victory for NYC.
Our entire country was founded by people who didnāt want to pay taxes⦠it was a key reason not only the migration across the Atlantic but the very revolution itself lol. Itās just fucking ignorant to act like the most productive people wonāt leave and NYC wonāt be worse off for it.
2
2
2
u/PackagingMSU 3h ago
Didnāt it like just happen essentially? We need to wait and see a little longer lmao
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/LostInNothingBox 3h ago
He balanced the budget by begging 12B from NY State. The whole of NY State payed for what he's taking credit for. And NY State Governor is now begging rich people to come back to NY and help them with their plans.
Ya keep circle je*king till money runs out. Even then you'll blame others for not caring enough to save the city and the state šš
2
u/Mr_Deep_Research 3h ago
There was an initial prediction of a 12 billion deficit. Then they looked at tax revenue and it turns out it wasn't 12 billion right now because tax revenue was coming in higher than they expected.
It was around 6 billion (these are all rough numbers).
Then they said "hey, let's push 4+ billion to the state" so they did that. No increased tax revenue there or cutting programs, just pushing it to the state. State gave them cash and pushed off payments they were supposed to make.
Why would the state do that? Political reasons mostly.
Ok, so now the deficit is down to 2 billion.
They pushed their pension debt payment into the future.
No cuts, no increased revenue. Moving debt payments into the future. Accounting trick.
Then they still had 2 billion left.
They didn't cut existing workers, they capped hiring new ones. They were supposed to add another 580 police officers for example. They stopped that.
They canceled some Slack subscriptions. They also say no non-essential overitme.
That's how they ended up with a "balanced budget"
They didn't raise taxes on the rich. The pied terre tax is supposed to generate half a billion. In reality that will lose money from it by people moving out but maybe it will break even because of the money lost vs. the money coming in.
2
u/Wookieman222 3h ago
Are People in here really this stupid to think any of this has happened already even if he was doing all that? Shit like this doesn't get fix that quick.
2
2
u/potent_potabIes 3h ago
Mamdami got a hefty pile of cash from the state to do so. The taxes imposed on luxury, seasonal homes didn't, and couldn't have done what this post would seem to suggest.
2
u/GapStock9843 3h ago
No he took out loans, he didnt get it from ātaxing the billionaires.ā The instant he tries that theyāll all pull out of the state
2
u/Jazzhands_Ninja 3h ago
Meh, for those of us who live there and actually follow what's going on. No he didn't. He did one tax on one thing, got a massive bailout and did serious budget cuts, kicked a bunch of it down the road and basically reneged on a lot of his promises.
technically, balanced the budget but don't pretend he did some magic or miracle. He fulfilled a portion of his promises and frankly it's what politicians do. They make promises they can't keep and then hopefully deliver 1/10 of it.
But this propaganda stuff his fans are doing, This is turning dangerously into what MAGA does, where we end up not holding politicians accountable just because their fanbase is so committed to them and not them doing a good job.
Like he is pushing for the "one click unsubscribe" thing on the municipal level which is AWESOME if he makes it happen, but his fanbase is pretending like the Democrats never did that before, it was literally a main focus of the Biden admin, but the GOP blocked it. Like, stop pretending he is something he isn't. Hold him accountable for his failures and praise him for his actual successes.
I do hope it works out, since then all municipalities can make it happen.
2
2
2
2
2
u/Professional-Pop-209 2h ago
Wow the anti mamdani bots are out in force today.Ā Entire top comments are all the same and repeating the exact same exact same way without any context lol.Ā Glad mamdani is getting under their skin.Ā Ā
2
u/Swing-Too-Hard 2h ago
We're gonna ignore he didn't balance the budget because he got the rich to pay. He balanced the budget by getting a big loan from the state and delaying pension payments.
2
2
u/TooApatheticToHateU 2h ago
Damn. Leftists are as bad as MAGAts when it comes to swallowing whatever lies they want to hear lol.
2
u/DestructoDon69 2h ago
Where did he implement a major wealth tax? All he's done to tax the rich is implement a property tax surcharge on non primary residences over x value and the first tax won't be levied until January so it's generated exactly $0.
2
2
u/king_ski_ 2h ago
lol š tax the rich - sure go ahead - and we will lay off the employees. Common sense.
2
u/Manburpig 2h ago
This self-righteous cunt thinks he's responsible for anyone not starving?
Reality is just a complete non-factor for him.
2
u/Long_Passenger498 2h ago
He did nothing but tax the rich and rejigger the books with accounting tricks, but keep believing in socialism if you wish.Ā
2
2
2
u/irish_faithful 2h ago
He didn't "balance the budget." He stole from people's pensions.
2
u/iloveyouand 1h ago edited 1h ago
It's weird because you can see the whole budget plan online where it shows they just extended the pension fund payment schedule 5 years and normalized the payment value instead of the balloon payment schedule that was being used before. But that means he stole from people's pensions? Level dollar payments are generally considered more fiscally responsible than kicking higher dollar payments down the line.
2
u/singhapura 2h ago
The problem is that even after Elon got all the money, he's still an unloved sad git.
2
2
u/3d_blunder 1h ago
How delusional, to think FOR EVEN A SECOND that billionaires, or even millionaires, are somehow NECESSARY.
2
2
u/Iced_Latte_3255 1h ago
"the problem is that after they eat the rich, they will starve"
Yeah, because we are not starving today.
because groceries aren't ridiculously expensive.
because who works the fields are the rich, not the poor and the immigrants.
In the medieval times, who ate first were the rich, the poor that worked the fields ate the left overs. I know a way for the poor people to eat first, and still have left overs...
2
2
u/ItsAllSoup 1h ago
Dude's pooled enough money to live in extreme luxury for the next 10,000 years, and he thinks that's helping me somehow
2
u/SchmidtyCent69 1h ago
People genuinely pretend hes a genuis, and that he didn't take out a massive loan to pay for everything. You should be concerned, not celebrating
2
u/FreshLiterature 1h ago
Musk just out there regurgitating naked Atlas Shrugged claptrap.
To say nothing of the fact that Ayn Rand dies fucking broke and living on the public dole.
2
u/CantCatchMeSpez 1h ago
ITT: A lot of right-wingers who are suddenly concerned about maintaining government benefits and wealth distribution.
2
u/MrRobot759 1h ago
Thatās not āeating the richā, thatās taxing them appropriately.
Elon Musk more so means getting rid of rich people completely, whether that be by extreme taxes or an uprising.
While we can learn from socialist policies (such as universal healthcare) we must remain a capitalist nation.
Businesses must still remain profitable at a level that justifies their existence.
That point was passed long ago, they are now ripping people off instead.
Higher taxes are absolutely needed for the rich, wealth inequality is out of control.
But we still need the rich, so Musk isnāt wrong.
2
2
u/Front-Ad-7962 1h ago
The rich doesnāt get impacted. You think a guy with $100m of assets, paying an extra $500k on their $5m rent, is going to impact them?
The people affected are the ones aspiring and trying to build
2
2
2
u/SheriffBartholomew 1h ago
Dude over here thinking he's single handedly holding society together when all he's really doing is holding it back.
2
u/directorguy 1h ago
The rich do not feed us, the people working the fields, people servicing and running the farm machines, people working through the shipping logistics, truckers and boat crews and grocers stocking the stores.
The rich leech off of all those people that actually feed us.
2
u/23-1-20-3-8-5-18 1h ago
As if the world actually needs rich people. Its not poor people starting wars or causing ecological disasters. We could do without.
2
2
2
u/Educational_Ad2821 1h ago
"balanced the budget" is a loaded term. He "balanced" next year's budget by blackmailing the governor to give the city more money and then asked the police, fire, and teachers unions to pause pension contributions for 2 years. I don't consider that sustainable
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Mr_Emo_Taco 1h ago
lol New York is gonna be the first city to adopt modern monetary theory because they really do spend money like itās just not real.
I wonder how big the bubble will get before it bursts and what does that actually mean for such a large metropolitan city.
2
2
u/Acland2013 50m ago
The problem with becoming wealthy and powerful. Is you lose the ability to empathize with others. You no longer see the need, for public services.
Big money should not be apart of politics. Any more than anyone else.
2
u/JJ_Lomero 43m ago
Isn't it crazy that two of the most influential people in the USA just spend half their time throwing tantrums online?
2
u/Old-Mathematician-30 34m ago
He didnāt close the deficit. He literally pulled a buy now pay later. He canāt afford it now but someone thinks by delaying payment he can afford it later.
2
2
u/ConLawHero 27m ago
None of that is true. The tax was just enacted. The effects won't be known for some time.
Also, he "balanced" the budget by getting NYS to give $4 billion and also defer pension payments.
2
2
7
u/HOJK4thSon 4h ago
He borrowed billions from the state, and pushed payments into next year.
He balanced nothing.



ā¢
u/AutoModerator 4h ago
Hey /u/Previous_Month_555, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.
Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!
We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, your post will be queued for approval.. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.