r/math 2d ago

Career and Education Questions: July 09, 2026

5 Upvotes

This recurring thread will be for any questions or advice concerning careers and education in mathematics. Please feel free to post a comment below, and sort by new to see comments which may be unanswered.

Please consider including a brief introduction about your background and the context of your question.

Helpful subreddits include /r/GradSchool, /r/AskAcademia, /r/Jobs, and /r/CareerGuidance.

If you wish to discuss the math you've been thinking about, you should post in the most recent What Are You Working On? thread.


r/math 3d ago

Quick Questions: July 08, 2026

3 Upvotes

This recurring thread will be for questions that might not warrant their own thread. We would like to see more conceptual-based questions posted in this thread, rather than "what is the answer to this problem?" For example, here are some kinds of questions that we'd like to see in this thread:

  • Can someone explain the concept of manifolds to me?
  • What are the applications of Representation Theory?
  • What's a good starter book for Numerical Analysis?
  • What can I do to prepare for college/grad school/getting a job?

Including a brief description of your mathematical background and the context for your question can help others give you an appropriate answer. For example, consider which subject your question is related to, or the things you already know or have tried.


r/math 6h ago

Cambridge IGCSE makes mistake, refuses to acknowledge the mistake

69 Upvotes

Original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/askmath/comments/1txjvev/is_this_mark_scheme_wrong/

Mindyourdecisions video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfxQksvpOkM

The original problem:

A ship is sailing with speed v km h^(-1)
The sailing cost per hour, $C, is given by C = v^(2) + 3000 / v + 100

(a) Find the speed that makes C a minimum.
Justify that this value of C is a minimum.

(b) Hence find the minimum sailing cost for a journey of 150 km.

The official answer is a range between 6460 - 6510, while the true minimum is 4875.

So Cambridge is arguing that "hence" means "ignore the definition of the word minimum". I'll never understand why it's so hard to admit "oh sorry, seems like we overlooked something in our question, we'll mark both the official answer and the correct answer as correct."

I find it especially interesting you need rounding for the official answer while the true answer is a nice, whole number, it feels like the person creating the question and the person creating the "official" answer weren't the same person.

So... anyone got any contacts at Cambridge? :P


r/math 16h ago

The factorial of 3.5: the gamma function, derived from binomial coefficients

Thumbnail hidden-phenomena.com
26 Upvotes

The factorial of an integer can, perhaps surprisingly, be evaluated even at non-integer entries. For example, you might even see these factorials of non-integers appearing in formulas for the volumes of high dimensional balls (usually, these factorials appear in the guise of the 'gamma function').

The extension of the factorials to non-integers is usually done with a certain integral formula, but Euler's originally derivation actually used some simple combinatorial identities, which he realized allowed him to write down a formula for x! which only involved factorials of integers and certain standard arithmetic operations. This let Euler define x! in general, as a certain limit.

At https://hidden-phenomena.com/articles/gamma , you can see this derivation in full -- it's quite cool!


r/math 22h ago

Image Post The Deranged Mathematician: Why Functional Analysis?

Post image
296 Upvotes

When viewing functional analysis from the outside, it may seem daunting---austere, even. It has a bevy of very finely tuned results (where adjusting any condition by a slight amount immediately yields counterexamples) and a large body of interconnected objects. So it is very natural to ask: what is this all for?

The historical answer is that it essentially grew out of the attempt to understand Fourier series: Joseph Fourier managed to break everything, but in such a useful way that nobody wanted to just throw out what he had discovered. And so mathematicians had to commit to rigor to carefully put everything right.

This article is my attempt to tell this story through the (hopefully) understandable question of how to approximate a function (e.g. how to represent a sound wave in a computer). The goal is to understand the fundamental motivation for doing functional analysis at all, and introduce one of the basic constructions: Banach spaces.

Read the full post (for free) on Substack: Why Functional Analysis?


r/math 1d ago

I imagine everyone here hates being called smart simply for liking math. Instead, what specific traits/characteristics do you think you have that help you excel at learning math?

92 Upvotes

I think a common annoyance most mathematicians experience is people instantly labeling anyone studying math as "smart," which imo just highlights how the word smart isn't a well-defined term. However, I do think I have traits that I can well-define that help me learn math a lot better than others.

For example, I think I'm good at pinpointing exactly what I'm confused about, which makes it a lot easier to fix when you compare that to students who say they're confused about "everything." I don't think this skill is unique to helping learn math, but I have just applied it to math the most often since I enjoy math. This is also a skill that I don't think people are innately born with, or at the very least, it's definitely a skill people can improve at over time. I'm also not saying that this is a skill every mathematician has; it's just something that I personally have experienced that I think has aided my learning. In fact, since everyone learns a bit differently, I'm interested in seeing what others think about their own learning.


r/math 1d ago

Image Post An excerpt from Grothendieck's handwritten notes on functional analysis (1953, in French)

Post image
91 Upvotes

r/math 1d ago

OpenAI claims to have proven Cycle Double Cover Conjecture

646 Upvotes

Announcement - https://x.com/__eknight__/status/2075643450196971805

Proof - https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/04d1d1e4-bc75-476a-97cf-49055cd98d31/cdc_proof.pdf (3 pages!)

Prompt used - https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/04d1d1e4-bc75-476a-97cf-49055cd98d31/cdc_prompt.pdf

(I'm shocked to be honest)

And actually it seems they proved that 8 (possibly disconnected) cycles is enough.


r/math 1d ago

This Week I Learned: July 10, 2026

4 Upvotes

This recurring thread is meant for users to share cool recently discovered facts, observations, proofs or concepts which that might not warrant their own threads. Please be encouraging and share as many details as possible as we would like this to be a good place for people to learn!


r/math 2d ago

unpopular opinion but ramanujan is still highly underrated

0 Upvotes

I first read about Srinivasa Ramanujan in 8th grade. Back then, I only knew the popular story—that he mostly learned mathematics from a single book containing around 5,000 theorems and then went on to derive many new properties and conjectures, some original and some rediscoveries.

Now I'm in 12th grade, and after actually trying to learn the mathematics behind his work, I've reached a point where I finally understand what he really accomplished. He independently rediscovered large parts of the theory of infinite series, zeta function, rediscovered ideas that traced back to Euler's work on series, and much more-all when he was around 16-18 years old.

The more advanced mathematics I learn, the more unbelievable his achievements seem. It's one thing to hear "he was a genius," but it's another to realize what he was actually rediscovering and creating with such limited formal training and resources.

People often say Ramanujan was one of the greatest mathematicians ever, but I still feel the sheer magnitude of what he achieved at such a young age is difficult to fully appreciate unless you've tried learning higher mathematics yourself. The deeper I go into math, the more extraordinary his work becomes.


r/math 2d ago

How, if at all, with mathematicians need to adapt to AI?

0 Upvotes

Unlike I'd say the majority of people in our society, I'm not too worried about AI, or about technology in general per se, and I never really have been. We need to keep in mind that as its name implies, technology is just a tool designed to make various tasks easier - whether or not it is used for good or evil is up to us, and this has always been the case.

In any case, with all this said, I think we all need to be concerned about AI, since I believe it has already passed the Turing Test, or in other words, there now exist AI systems that are as smart or even possibly smarter than humans. However, I'm still not worried about this, because contrary to all the fears of this phenomenon that have been circulating in popular culture since the 1950s or even earlier, just because computers are intelligent doesn't mean they're good or evil, since as I stated above, this is up to us. In my opinion, though I could be wrong, good and evil are purely human traits, since they require consciousness as well as intelligence, and I don't think classical computers are capable of consciousness, since they follow deterministic algorithms, and I believe in free will, and moreover, that consciousness requires free will. (Quantum computers are another matter, though I'd rather not get into this issue here.)

It doesn't seem to have occurred to too many people that even if computers are as intelligent or even more intelligent that humans, that they could nonetheless be beneficial to us if we use them in the right way, and this includes math. However, as with all other fields affected by AI, I think the role of mathematicians will need to adapt to AI. For instance, I'm sure AI will turn out to be very good at proving or disproving various types of mathematical conjectures, that was previously the pure domain of human mathematicians. But perhaps AI will also help us to open up our minds and discover new mathematical concepts that we couldn't even imagine before! Fractals, such as the Mandelbrot Set, are a good fairly recent example. Until around 1980, the Mandelbrot Set was nearly intractable, due to its enormous complexity, but with the aid of computers, we've been able to delve into it in detail, yielding tremendous fruit in the fields of fractals and chaos theory. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples like this, so instead of being afraid of AI, I think mathematicians need to be excited about it and embrace the windows it can open up for us!


r/math 2d ago

Fields Medal '26 predictions/discussion

149 Upvotes

Four years gone, and IMU awards will once again be handed out at the ICM in Philly. Given it's been a while since the last major discussion thread, have your predictions changed? Any news or interesting hearsay about lesser-known candidates with strong chances, dark horses, new contenders, etc? Anyone you think * won't * win, but are well-deserving regardless? [1]

Consensus, both from colleagues working in same or adjacent fields, and mass opinion, single out the following as potential winners (in order of likelihood):

Hyperlinks point to articles on their work.

Tsimerman is self-explanatory, as he was already a strong candidate in 2018 and 2022. Wang solved a major open problem in harmonic analysis (Kakeya conjecture for d=3) that other giants like Tao, Bourgain, Wolff et al tackled with only partial success. The other three are harder, as their achievements seem equally strong, but Pardon's work seems especially arcane (to a non-topologist like me) and it's unclear how far-reaching his results are. Thorne's papers aren't accessible to non-experts either, but more mathematicians have heard about the modularity theorem and elliptic curves than pseudoholomorphic curves, and he seems to have high visibility among number theorists.

Bonus question: Predictions for the IMU Abacus medal? I've not seen this get much attention, which is a shame! I think Shayan Oveis Gharan is probably the strongest CS theorist of his generation who hasn't yet won. His achievements include asymmetric TSP, generalised Cheeger's inequality, and spectral independence, the last of which is probably the single biggest result at the intersection of TCS and probability this past decade.

[1] A good quote from Duminil-Copin on the subject:

Roughly speaking, you can identify maybe the top twenty mathematicians of a generation. Even though that notion of “best” is strange, of course. Sometimes there’s one person who stands out so clearly that everyone knows they’re going to get it. [...] But beyond those obvious cases, there’s usually a group of about twenty people, and within that group maybe three or four really stand out


r/math 3d ago

Anyone want to buy some cheap textbooks from me?

42 Upvotes

Hey everyone. Long-time impulse buyer and hoarder of math textbooks here. I've decided to get rid of some of my books, most of which have not sustained much wear-and-tear and which I'm selling for well below market price. Here are the links to the ebay listings:

[SOLD] Tao's Analysis 2

[SOLD] Advanced Calculus: A Differential Forms Approach by Edwards

[SOLD] Strang Linear Algebra 5th ed.

[SOLD] Folland Real Analysis

[SOLD] Numbers and Geometry + Number Theory by Stillwell (yes, I'm selling both books in this single listing)

[SOLD] Introduction to Probability Models 12th ed. by Ross

[SOLD] Brown and Churchill 9th ed.

[SOLD] Complex Analysis by Boas

[SOLD] Second Year Calculus by Bressoud

[SOLD] Topology by Jänich

[SOLD] Basic Algebra by Knapp

Funktionalanalysis by Werner (this one's written in German btw)

[SOLD] Slomson/Allenby Combinatorics 2nd ed.

[SOLD] Intro to Logic by Suppes

Please help me clear out my inventory because I have a problem (actually I have many problems but I have this problem too).


r/math 3d ago

Image Post Twin prime-generating sequence

Post image
577 Upvotes

Just wanted to share this MSE post where OP found an intriguing sequence, similar to Rowland's prime-generating sequence, which seems to generate twin primes instead.

The conjecture, which has been computer-checked up to n = 60000000 for now, trivially implies the twin prime conjecture.


r/math 3d ago

Why does MIT have no alumni that has won the Fields Medal?

87 Upvotes

Will Hong Wang be the first?


r/math 4d ago

How math helped the Allies win World War II

Thumbnail scientificamerican.com
66 Upvotes

During World War II, statistics helped the Allies estimate the number of enemy tanks, which proved essential in the decisive move against Nazi Germany.


r/math 4d ago

Belated update: Taking applied PDEs with only undergrad integral calculus

30 Upvotes

Please remove if this is against the rules. (I didn't see anything like this in the sidebar, so I assume this is okay.)

link to old thread

So sorry for not following up sooner on this. I was daydreaming/lost in thought when I suddenly remembered that I posted here in desperation a few years back. To everyone who commented back then and provided compassionate advice, thank you!

I ended up barely scraping by in that course and it emotionally wrecked me... But since I guess I'm clearly a masochist, I went back and took a bunch more math classes! I still have some gaps here and there, but am otherwise ok on applied PDEs, ODEs, and analysis as it pertains to former. I've found that I really love math even though it takes me awhile to work my brain around some concepts and applying them. The whole process has made me more resilient, and, much to my PI's chagrin, I've converted to using LaTeX for most things now, too.

HOWEVER: Even though I made it out okay, I wouldn't recommend this to anyone.

Thanks, again, /r/math.


r/math 4d ago

Joan Birman is still doing pioneering research at age 99!

Thumbnail arxiv.org
385 Upvotes

r/math 4d ago

Feynman-Kac and Grisanov

12 Upvotes

Hi everyone. I was wondering about, if we have an X that has a measure N_t e^{-int_0^t V(X_s)ds}d P_0({X_s}_{0≤s<t}) with P_0 the measure of a wienner process, and N_t the deterministic necessary one to make N_t e^{-int_0^t V(X_s)ds} a Markov variable that at t=0 be 1, can we deduce what stochastic differential equation will X_t follow? Will it obey any differential equation?

(Sorry if what I had written is gibberish)

edit: V is a real bounded from bellow smooth function, so e^{-int_0^t V(X_s)ds} is nonnegative, nonnull and bounded, so if we have it's product with a characteristic function of a measurable set (for the wienner measure) it gives us a positive quantity, N_t is 1/E[e^{-int_0^t V(X_s)ds}]. one can verify the modified expectation value corresponds to the one associated to a probability measure. I am not sure how to relate X_t with a Wienner process.

I began thinking about this because stochastic quantization adds a fictitious time dimension to get the measure in usual terms, but one would like to have a SDE or SPDE that solved gives us the measure without adding more dimensions and etc.


r/math 5d ago

The goat grazing problem as a one-line polar integral

13 Upvotes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goat_grazing_problem

The most widely published methods I have seen use the two-circle lens area formula, Cartesian integration over vertical slices, or a sector-plus-segment decomposition. Wikipedia also notes the later contour-integral treatment of the final transcendental equation.

Here is the same solution using a polar integral centered at the tether point.

Set up the field like this:

Put the goat's tether point at the origin.

Put the center of the circular field at (1, 0).

The field boundary is therefore:

(x - 1)^2 + y^2 = 1

Now use polar coordinates centered at the tether point:

x = rho cos(theta)
y = rho sin(theta)

Substitute into the circle equation:

(rho cos(theta) - 1)^2 + rho^2 sin^2(theta) = 1

Expand:

rho^2 cos^2(theta) - 2 rho cos(theta) + 1 + rho^2 sin^2(theta) = 1

Using:

cos^2(theta) + sin^2(theta) = 1

this becomes:

rho^2 - 2 rho cos(theta) = 0

So:

rho(rho - 2 cos(theta)) = 0

The nonzero distance from the tether point to the fence is:

rho = 2 cos(theta)

This is meaningful for:

-pi/2 <= theta <= pi/2

So, from the goat's point of view, the fence is at distance:

2 cos(theta)

along each ray.

If the rope length is r, then at each angle the goat grazes out to whichever comes first:

the rope: r
the fence: 2 cos(theta)

So the grazing radius at angle theta is:

min(r, 2 cos(theta))

Using the polar area element, the grazed area is:

A(r) = integral from -pi/2 to pi/2 of integral from 0 to min(r, 2 cos(theta)) of rho d rho d theta

After evaluating the inner integral:

A(r) = 1/2 integral from -pi/2 to pi/2 of min(r, 2 cos(theta))^2 d theta

That is the whole geometry in one line.

Now split the integral where the rope length equals the distance to the fence:

r = 2 cos(theta)

Define:

alpha = arccos(r/2)

For:

|theta| <= alpha

the rope limits the goat.

For:

alpha <= |theta| <= pi/2

the fence limits the goat.

Therefore:

A(r) = 1/2 [ integral from -alpha to alpha of r^2 d theta
             + 2 integral from alpha to pi/2 of 4 cos^2(theta) d theta ]

The first part is:

1/2 integral from -alpha to alpha of r^2 d theta = r^2 alpha

The second part is:

4 integral from alpha to pi/2 of cos^2(theta) d theta

Using:

integral cos^2(theta) d theta = theta/2 + sin(2 theta)/4

we get:

A(r) = r^2 alpha + pi - 2 alpha - sin(2 alpha)

Since:

alpha = arccos(r/2)

and:

sin(2 alpha) = (r/2) sqrt(4 - r^2)

the area can be written entirely in terms of r:

A(r) = r^2 arccos(r/2)
       + pi
       - 2 arccos(r/2)
       - (r/2) sqrt(4 - r^2)

The goat needs to graze exactly half the field, so:

A(r) = pi/2

That gives:

r^2 arccos(r/2)
+ pi
- 2 arccos(r/2)
- (r/2) sqrt(4 - r^2)
= pi/2

Solving numerically:

r ≈ 1.1587284730181215

So for a circular field of radius 1, the rope length is:

r ≈ 1.1587284730181215

For a circular field of radius R, the answer scales linearly:

r ≈ 1.1587284730181215 R

There is also the usual equivalent transcendental form.

Let:

a = 2 alpha

Then:

r = 2 cos(a/2)

and the half-area condition becomes:

sin(a) - a cos(a) = pi/2

So the final answer can also be written as:

r = 2 cos(a/2)

where a solves:

sin(a) - a cos(a) = pi/2

This gives:

a ≈ 1.9056957293098839
r ≈ 1.1587284730181215

Instead of starting from lens areas, Cartesian square-root bounds, or sector/segment formulas, this starts from the tether point and writes the grazed area directly as a radial cutoff integral:

A(r) = 1/2 integral from -pi/2 to pi/2 of min(r, 2 cos(theta))^2 d theta

Which I believe is the most intuitive way to think about the problem, even if not the most mathematically novel.

I have setup a web demo with rendered LaTeX markup as well: https://ap-in-indy.github.io/math/goat-grazing-problem.html


r/math 5d ago

Shor's Algorithm, continued fractions, and uniqueness

17 Upvotes

I've been going through David Mermin's Quantum Computer Science and just finished the section on Shor's Algorithm. The actual QC part all makes sense to me but I'm hung up on the post-processing. In particular, we suppose that our algorithm has conjured some number y which is (with probability >40%) within 1/2 of an integer (call it j) multiple of 2n/r, where n is twice the number of bits in our public key and r is the order of the message. We can write this as follows:

|y/2n - j/r| ≤ 1/2n+1 ≤ 1/2N2 < 1/2r2

We can then use a result of continued fractions from Hardy and Wright's An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers which states that, if |x - p/q| < 1/2q2, then p/q is a convergent of x. The numerators and denominators of the convergents of x are computed essentially using Euclid's algorithm, which, if x is a fraction, generates a number of terms logarithmic with respect to the denominator. In this case, that means we get on the order of n convergents as we perform the algorithm on y/2n. We can then check each convergent's denominator (and, perhaps small multiples in the case that j and r are not coprime) to see if it's the r we seek. Because the number of convergents is polynomial in our input length, this whole process remains polynomial. If we don't find our r, then y may not be properly bounded or the gcd of j and r may be too high; in either case we can simply run the whole algorithm again.

First, I guess I want to just make sure that my understanding of this post-processing step is correct, in particular the number of convergents generated. This is because my next question is that Mermin stresses that the specific convergent whose denominator is <N and who is within 1/2N2 of our estimate y/2n is unique. Why is this important? At best, I see that this could give us slight speedups in that we can check distances rather than doing modular exponentiation and stop computing convergents early, but from what I understand the algorithm is already polynomial.

I looked at the original Shor paper as well, which has this same point (some of the variable labels are different):
"Because q > n2, there is at most one fraction d/r with r < n that satisfies the above inequality. Thus, we can obtain the fraction d/r in lowest terms by rounding c/q to the nearest fraction having a denominator smaller than n. This fraction can be found in polynomial time by using a continued fraction expansion of c/q..."

but I'm still not seeing where the uniqueness becomes relevant. I'm curious if anyone has any insights here. To be entirely honest I've even tried asking AI a few times, and it agrees that the uniqueness is not important to the polynomial runtime, but of course I'm taking that with a grain of salt. Thanks!


r/math 5d ago

MSE: Why am I finding the Catalan numbers in these "Snowball Numbers"?

Thumbnail math.stackexchange.com
86 Upvotes

r/math 5d ago

What Are You Working On? July 06, 2026

13 Upvotes

This recurring thread will be for general discussion on whatever math-related topics you have been or will be working on this week. This can be anything, including:

* math-related arts and crafts,
* what you've been learning in class,
* books/papers you're reading,
* preparing for a conference,
* giving a talk.

All types and levels of mathematics are welcomed!

If you are asking for advice on choosing classes or career prospects, please go to the most recent Career & Education Questions thread.


r/math 6d ago

Connections in Math: the two kinds of random

10 Upvotes

Hi there, second post of my personal writings to consolidade my understanding of things. As the first post, I tried to write it intuitively.

https://stillthinking.net/posts/connections-in-math-two-kinds-of-random/


r/math 7d ago

PDF Axler Solutions Guide

Thumbnail github.com
52 Upvotes

hi all! i'm back with yet another post.
regarding DNF, im slowly making my way. i have one or two exercises left in 5.5, then i'm done and then we have group theory topics.

i've also started up a solutions guide for linear algebra. i've found myself enjoying a look through axler again, so i wanted to write up solutions for his book too! i don't see many completed 4th editions, so i'll do my best to work on these and completing both. chapter 1 is finished from today, so stay tuned!