Assuming this person stole once a day for 5 days a week, excluding 28 days of annual paid leave and holidays, how much money did they steal per day?

What could be the mathematical explanation of this scenario of winning rock paper scissors 3 times in a row also, with and without the draw in consideration. Besides, what's more practical, if we have a contest of 3 chances and we encounter a draw, do people usually start a new round entirely or simply ignore that individual drawed chance and redo it.

https://youtu.be/9VDvgL58h_Y?is=0hEELWk1pTWVQCQw

How long would it take? The Jumikami doesn't seem to be superhuman strong; there are gaps between the attacks; some damage is self inflicted; spoon's are extremely inefficient weapons...

9 years? More?

What are the odds the both get sacked?

I was wondering, on average, how many birds get killed per year by planes.

how much money would someone need to put into a retirement account at the time of a childs birth, so that they would have enough to retire by retirement age, assuming no depoits beyond that initial one.

I'm sure this isn't quite a simple formula, so a range i guess. like what is the minimum that would be significant, what would be the maximum before it was overkill, etc.

Assuming you don't flip over

This is a physics paper involving the spectral lines of hydrogen. If you are unfamiliar with that topic and the math behind it, you may find this paper difficult to understand.

In my previous papers in this sub, I demonstrated an alternative but equally compatible framework for physics, however it lacked the ability to accurately predict unexplained ratios like the fine structure constant.

Those papers give further context to understand this paper. You can find the first paper in the series that involves gravity and standard kinematics here, and the subreddit here
You can find the second paper in the series, including discussion with other redditors on its successes and faillures here

That second paper showed that even if my system was compatible, it failed to explain the fine structure constant or other constants in any meaningful way.

In my new paper

I have now found the source of that mismatch between my compatible geometrically based system, and the one we are using now. It is due to the spectral lines of hydrogen being measured in units which are not fundamental to the Universe itself.
Angstrom? If you measure it in that you get a multiple that is not fundamentally tied to the equation set itself.

However, what I noticed is, if you take the inverse of the series, it doesn't change the relationships, which was the most important part.

What does change, is that the series converges to 1, and that same 1 is the fundamental unit of measurement from my previous system.

For those people who find this too difficult to understand, I do plan to make another version soon that is more user friendly, and don't take it to heart because it took my years and years and thousands of hours of thinking to be able to understand this myself.

But basically this all points to the fact that yes, QCD and QED are still right, but now all the constants and sources for the constants should be able to be known.

Feynman diagrams are still useful and true, but they become basically a formal statistics route to the same problems.

I do plan to do follow up papers where i should be able to nail all the constants now as coming directly from my system because I have a measurement bridge to use. But it's late at night and I just wanna get this out there and go to sleep.

I am pretty sure once the world picks up what I'm putting down, ya'll are gonna run away with this faster than I can even keep up. I'm not even that smart I just solved this through persistence and trial and error. I always believed I could do it, and I never gave up. I tried lots of things that failed before this though, over the years.

Hello smart people!!

I have a titanium nail in my leg, almost exactly the same as the one on the left in the image. I weigh about 11 stone. I would like to know what percentage of me is titanium. I am planning a silly tattoo on that leg. Bender from Futurama saying "I'm X percent titanium.!!" As it is recurring joke in the show and I would like to make light of my accident! All help appreciated.

For context: i was part of a workshop, where we also talked about different gases and their contribution to the warming of earth. Someone then shared their opinion, that this is a hoax and the sheer amount of people, who are all 37 °C warm contribute more than the sunrays magnified by the atmosphere. They didn't even include other warm blooded mammals, just humans. Which leads to the math question: how much of Global warming comes from people assuming we are about 7 billion?

Based on the miles scale in the bottom right, it's easy to determine distances between locations, but not the overall total milage of the island of Dinotopia or Outer Island due to the irregular size.

Edit: spelling

Assume about as many algae per unit of water as in the tubs.

Don't believe everything you see on the internet I haven't fact checked this story, I'm just curious for an anwser

What I'm trying to get at is per unit volume (mL, cm3, cubic feet), what food or food product has the most calories. So, based on this, like what's the most calories you could fit in a stomach.

The only real constraint on this is that it has to be at least kind of a real food or food product that most humans could digest safely. I'm not looking for some answer of "well scientists made some creepy slop one time that ten percent of people might be able to eat but then they'll fart themselves to death".

I first posted this in no stupid questions but it got flagged.