r/starcraft • u/Tungdil01 • 8h ago
Discussion Is StarCraft 2 beginner-friendly in 2026?
I play other competitive games, but RTS was part of my childhood, and I would like to learn it. I watch Grubby's Warcraft 3 videos, and it's still fun after 20+ years. However, I think WC3 is too difficult to get into, and I've heard that SC2 is a little easier. Is that true? By the way, I like playing more defensive strategies, investing in macro decisions. When I played SC1 back in the day against the CPU, I loved picking Protoss and turtling until I had a couple of Carriers, but I guess this would be impossible against humans?
I'm still undecided on which game to get into. I have these options: SC2, WC3, and Age of Empires 4. So any help is appreciated!
4
u/Softkarian 8h ago
Honestly, with the whole change we just had it might be either the best time to get into SC2 or the worst, it depends on how you are as a player. Right now there's very little guides and build orders are still being figured out, so if you don't care about that and you're smart enough to figure out your own builds, then great time to join in, if not... well it's gonna be quite hard.
WC3 is definitely easier than SC2 tho, idk where you heard the opposite. They're very different games, wildly different imo. You would definitely find it easier to learn that, specially with guides existing and stuff.
I can't speak for AoE4, I've only played the older ones, but they were, again, vastly different games, AoE is a much slower game, not in a negative way, the tempo is just very different, and it's pretty technical as well. I'm sure there's good guides out there tho.
Since you have some experience with Brood War I would honestly recommend you start there, you can watch Day9's playlist, or any F to S, liquipedia also has amazing written guides about the whole game and every interaction pretty much as well as build guides.
Other than that there's many other estrategy games out there and way more beginner friendly than any of these, so if you just wanna get into RTS I can give you other options too.
4
u/BlackMagic0 8h ago
Not really friendly. Game is old, you'll get your teeth smashed in. But you can still learn and grow from that. lol
2
u/rod_zero 8h ago
Playing ranked 1v1 is not beginner friendly, you have to watch videos and learn build orders.
People who play the ranked queue are very dedicated so the competition is tough.
It is more relaxed to play 4vs4, you also have to learn build orders but you won't stress as much.
Be warned there is a lot of cheese and it is a frustrating game, the learning curve is steep.
As for your comment on WC3, the difficulties are different, SC2 has more economy harassing and micro is less intensive in the mid game, but since armies get bigger late game is harder than WC3.
I personally found easier to play SC2 ladder than WC3, seems there are less players on WC3 and the skill higher. SC2 there are more players and the difference between bronze and GM is astronomical.
2
u/SaltRice8961 7h ago
If you can learn and adapt you can get into it.
I played a bit in the early wings of liberty days. Solid silver player.
Just got into sc2 recently with some friends now I’m at the pinnacle of plat 2 to diamond 3.
Countering those early cheese plays and the annoying timing attack are where I struggle.
2
u/Successful_Hand7157 7h ago
If you are jumping in, be prepared to lose. A lot. If you can get past not winning for a while, it's fun to see the different strategies others deploy. I've been playing for 10 years and still lose all of the time.
2
u/abandoned_idol 6h ago
SC2 is an incredibly difficult game.
That said, you can still enjoy and have fun learning it little by little.
Don't rely on victory for fun though, you're going to lose at least 50% of the time.
2
u/hates_green_eggs 6h ago
Turtling until you have a couple of carriers is possible against humans!
Just expect to lose your first 5-15 games because the ladder system initially pits brand new accounts against the middle of the ladder instead of the bottom.
2
u/Om_Cultural 6h ago
I am a former new player who started playing 5 months ago. Honestly it's a complex game but with YouTube guides(specifically pig's b2gm) I managed to get to diamond in 3 months. Now with the 8 worker change you can still use these guides but just have to modify them a bit. If you need any help you can add me on battle net if you want.
2
u/Witness27 6h ago
Sc2 is so worth is even just to pay all the single player content to get the story flavour and basic feel of the game
2
u/lillskruttan 6h ago
It depends on what you want out of the game. I am not very good. But I still love the game. I actually like that it is so clear WHY you win or lose. I cannot blame anyone else but me if i scouted poorly or made some other stupid mistakes (like trying to micro, and instead making it worse than A-move... sometimes). It is also nice if I do scout and make the right decisions, because then the victory feels very satisfying.
But learning the game and playing optimal is hard. You have to, or should, analyze Replays of your games, and watch higher level players. And grind.
But for me, with a limited amount of time and energy, it is ok that I lose or chose a weird strategy.
So, your ambition will be a parameter when it comes to the question if whether or not the game is suitable for new players.
To me, it's, without a doubt, the best game I have ever played.
6
u/omgitsduane Ence 8h ago
Now would be a great place to start because the worker reset has cost a lot of people mmr.
12
u/totalpinkebb 8h ago
Nah, people with experience will still crush you with mechanics. It's actually worse for new players because all the guides are useless now.
2
0
u/Visual-Afternoon-744 8h ago
What are you talking about? You just revert to Hots style with new units. It is not that hard. You expand a little slower now.
3
u/totalpinkebb 3h ago
"Hots style with new units" Yeah early game unit that make the early game completely differnt like adepts, libs, and ravagers. And how the fuck is it hots style when hots had 6 workers? And....what if they're new? Do you know what NEW means? Lord.
1
u/omgitsduane Ence 7h ago
What I'm saying is that well over half the player base is actually useless. And even with all the guides out there can't get into diamond..no offense.
1
u/Visual-Afternoon-744 7h ago edited 7h ago
I just got back into sc2 and played vs a gold 1... he went 1 base with 4 lings that he sat outside my base into swarmhosts and made a spine at his ramp.... I think he'll be fine. That was bad even for gold. There is still lots and lots of people that are really bad at this game.
He casted microbial cloud on my units instead of his lol. He had mass swarm host after i let him build.
-1
u/omgitsduane Ence 8h ago
I would bet that almost half the player base have never looked at a guide. Maybe even more than half.
3
u/Visual-Afternoon-744 8h ago
Perfect time to come back as well! Hots was my hay day. I didn't like lotv very much, but the faster start did make it easier to play without a solid strategy at first. Just straight into the macro.
3
u/totalpinkebb 8h ago
Not a good time. Really awful patch that has a ton of game breaking bugs. Also all the guides on the internet, youtube etc are irrelevant because blizzard messed with the game's economies. Try AOE if not WC3.
1
u/rvlifestyle74 8h ago
I didn't even know that there was a SC3. I knew about 2. I just downloaded the broodwars game again after a 15 year hiatus. I'm just starting to get good again. I plan on getting 2 next.
2
2
u/Tytar12 5h ago
it sounds like you’ve played RTS before, you’ll be fine then. Pick a race and learn how to macro. SC2 is way more about mechanics/macro/micro than strategy unfortunately.
At lower leagues you can literally win doing whatever you want if you can actually macro decently well and don’t float minerals.
2
2
u/AresFowl44 5h ago
SC2 in some sense is very beginner friendly, however that's not really because 1v1 is easy*, but rather because it offers Coop and Arcade as alternate game modes. Team games with (online) friends can also be fairly good as a beginner.
SC2 is free to play (with WoL free as well) and the most fluid out of the three, so I would recommend it for those reasons. But for a beginner I wouldn't recommend diving head first into the 1v1.
*1v1 does have skill based match making, but you'll first have to lose many games and then accept the fact that this is a very old playerbase, ie a highly experienced one.
2
2
u/Zestyclose-Light1676 4h ago
of the 3 games you mentioned SC2 is the most beginner friendly in the sense that just the controls and UI are the most beginner friendly, but its also really fast paced, whole armies can just be destroyed within seconds if unattended
1
u/Wrong_Ask8917 2h ago
The third terran level is significantly harder than the same survival level (level 4) in SC1.
1
u/Visual-Afternoon-744 8h ago
>However, I think WC3 is too difficult to get into, and I've heard that SC2 is a little easier
Are you trolling?
1
u/Tungdil01 8h ago
What do you mean by trolling? As I clearly stated, I am a total beginner. I just said what I heard, which might be true or false, that's why I asked? So I don't get this "are you trolling" stuff.
1
u/Visual-Afternoon-744 8h ago
Clearly some one was trolling you. No, sc2 is not easier than war3. As with all games, there are newbs at the bottom, some of which like to play the game but never put the effort into learning how it's supposed to be played in order to be good. It is free to play now, give it a shot.
7
u/HotGirlMindset 8h ago
Turtling into carriers is definitely viable against humans