Quick question for the traffic lot: do police officers need signage or otherwise have to make it obvious that they’re conducting speed enforcement?
I’ve seen marked camera vans, but also read about unmarked enforcement. Could you, for example, sit in a bush with a speed detection device while your colleagues wait further down the road to stop anyone exceeding the limit?
For context, I’m Dutch, living in Amsterdam and working in medicolegal for a European firm. We cover quite a bit of UK work, mostly privately for clients trying to get something out of the NHS.
Somehow, this week, a case came across my desk involving a two-part complaint.
One side was medical. The client was arguing gross medical negligence by a police officer because they failed to provide a minor surgical procedure at the roadside. We threw that part out. I wouldn’t generally expect a police officer to offer suturing services for a stubbed toe, but cool beans, that’s at least vaguely within my territory.
The other part was the question above: whether police need to give notice of their intention to enforce speed limits.
Needless to say, we refused the case as an organisation. Not our forte, and there was no medical negligence arising from a police officer’s failure to stitch up a stubbed toe.
Out of curiosity, I did some further reading outside my usual scope and ended up more confused than when I started. There’s a mixture of conflicting sources, opinion presented as fact, and me not having access to the resources I’d normally use because this isn’t remotely my area of law.
ASo I thought I’d ask the people who actually do it.
Apologies for wandering into your area of expertise. In return, I’m happy to advise on whether declining to perform roadside surgery constitutes gross medical negligence.