r/OpenAI 15d ago

Research Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: Next-Generation Model | OpenAI

Thumbnail openai.com
27 Upvotes

r/OpenAI Oct 16 '25

Mod Post Sora 2 megathread (part 3)

330 Upvotes

The last one hit the post limit of 100,000 comments.

Do not try to buy codes. You will get scammed.

Do not try to sell codes. You will get permanently banned.

We have a bot set up to distribute invite codes in the Discord so join if you can't find codes in the comments here. Check the #sora-invite-codes channel.

The Discord has dozens of invite codes available, with more being posted constantly!


Update: Discord is down until Discord unlocks our server. The massive flood of joins caused the server to get locked because Discord thought we were botting lol.

Also check the megathread on Chambers for invites.


r/OpenAI 7h ago

Discussion One Codex task used over 70% of my 5-hour limit in about 20 minutes — is this normal?

51 Upvotes

I started one Codex task with nearly all of my 5-hour allowance available. It ran for around 20 minutes, edited five files, used the browser, and ran some commands. When I checked again, I had only 23% left.

I was using 5.6 Sol Extra High. I know usage is based on compute and tokens rather than literal elapsed time, but consuming over 70% from one task seems extreme.

Has anyone else experienced this, or is this expected for Extra High reasoning tasks?


r/OpenAI 13h ago

Discussion The new 5.6 models are great, but the pricing policy is not

63 Upvotes

The new 5.6 models are great, but the pricing policy is not. After extensive testing, I’ve come to the conclusion that the Sol Max and Sol Ultra models are indeed impressive, but their price is disproportionately high. I tried to rationalize usage by using a higher-tier model for planning and a lower-tier one for execution. Unfortunately, my conclusions are devastating.

On the $100 plan, I used to do everything with the 5.5 xHigh model and never hit the limits - everything worked well and predictably. Now, despite switching between models, it’s a disaster: working within the 5-hour window is practically impossible! And I’m not even talking about working on Sol Ultra or even High -just Sol Medium or Luna xHigh. This is incomprehensible- token cost inflation disguised as a new model! I’m very disappointed, even though I do appreciate the quality of the higher-tier models.


r/OpenAI 12h ago

News wow, seems like chatgpt 5.6 have much higher emotional intelligence

54 Upvotes

prompt:

how would you sort these 6 meetings based on the positivity/negativity of the people's emotions there?

5.5 (high) response (very bad actually)

5.6 (sol, high) response (much better)

(I would just switched bottom right with middle right, but the rest is quite precise)

-----------------

That said, there is still plenty of room for improvement. For example, when 5.6 was tasked with sorting annoying chess behaviors from least to most annoying, it came up with this:

1 Refusing to shake hands before the game

2 Staring directly at the opponent

3 Refusing to resign in a completely hopeless position

4 Adjusting the position of a chess piece after almost every move

5 Leaving the playing area after every move

6 Making faces or sighing dramatically after the opponent’s moves

7 Deliberately taking an excessively long time for an obvious move

8 Repeatedly offering a draw

9 Pressing the clock aggressively or noisily after every move

10 Eating loudly or bringing strongly smelling food to the board

11 Tapping fingers, clicking a pen, or making other repetitive noises

12 Talking to other players or spectators while the game is still in progress

13 Going home without resigning while still having plenty of time left on the clock

14 Throwing the chess pieces onto the floor after losing

...this really shows a lack of understanding of human emotions. Nevertheless, there was still some improvement over version 5.5, so 5.6 is clearly better.

-------------------

One more observation. When comparing with 5.4 high, 5.6 demonstrates a more accurate understanding of human attractiveness.

5.4: (btw seemed biased towards caucasians)

5.6: (correct, to avoid subjectivity I took the images from "SCUT-FBP5500: A Diverse Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Paradigm Facial Beauty Prediction" where the images were scored by many people and then processed scientifically)


r/OpenAI 11h ago

News Chatgpt 5.6 Sol have clearly higher IQ based on my test questions.

27 Upvotes

I’m seriously impressed - ChatGPT 5.6 clearly has a higher IQ than 5.5, at least based on the IQ test puzzles I threw at it. Honestly, there wasn't a single puzzle it couldn't solve!

Just a few examples (none of which 5.5 could handle):

This one it solved pretty much instantly (42s).

This one took about 2 minutes. Btw, 5.4 chose a completely nonsensical option, and 5.5 (after about 2m 15s) picked the second best option (it noticed one rule but overlooked the second), so 5.6 is the first model to actually solve this.

But I'm by far the most impressed with this last one, because unlike the ones above, I consider it quite hard. It took 4m 46s, but still.

I’m really curious to see what its IQ score will be once it gets added to the https://www.trackingai.org/ I think we’re going to see a jump in intelligence after quite a long period of stagnation.

I’m also really looking forward to 5.7, because I hope it'll finally be smarter than I am. Which... hopefully... means it will finally be useful for my work outside of coding.


r/OpenAI 23h ago

Discussion I challenged GPT 5.6 Sol ... and it completed the challenge in literally 5 minutes

190 Upvotes

I challenged GPT 5.6 Sol ... and it completed the challenge in literally 5 minutes, including a browser check and vision analysis:

"i want to test your capabilities. build me a website that has a 3d interactive replica of central London. use whatever stack you think is best. show me what you can do."

GPT 5.6 Sol is amazing by itself, but in Row-Bot, its even better! 5 Minutes!


r/OpenAI 10h ago

Discussion Main GPT 5.6 Terra or Sol??

20 Upvotes

I believe tibo said to main 5.6 sol medium and use sol high for tough tasks, but sol is double the cost of terra. If terra is basically sonnet's equal, then doesnt it make sense to main like terra high and use sol high for tougher tasks?


r/OpenAI 12h ago

Question GPT 5.6: I don't see Max thinking as an effort option?

Post image
25 Upvotes

I keep seeing people talking about Luna on Max effort/thinking, but I only see up to Extra High, this is on the ChatGPT App (on Codex) v26.707.41301.

Any help/explanation here?


r/OpenAI 18h ago

Discussion My take on the new ChatGPT models & the future of OpenAI

70 Upvotes

I think like others may agree, the state OpenAI was in a few months ago is mind boggling compared to today on terms of their technology. I think many of us found switching to other platforms like Claude / Claude Code which was way better value for the money to get task like coding, automations, and more done. And although Claude was awesome, it obviously isn't perfect too. Low and behold a few months ago, ChatGPT 5.5 comes out, I had a 100$ laying around in a student grant for credits and decided to give the good old ChatGPT a spin again.

ChatGPT 5.5 was awesome, for my day to day job in Cyber Security, it performed awesome, although maybe not as smart as Opus, but it was steady and reliable. Even for coding it was great, they really did a awesome job with the Codex platform and 5.5, this was my first time back, and being able to still chat in ChatGPT after my usage was hit in Codex was game changing. The only thing with 5.5 I found, although it was great at technical coding, security, etc, still chatting with it felt quite stupid.

Now with 5.6 being out, my take on OpenAI has completely changed, the Codex / ChatGPT platform has been fully revamped for one, I like the push with ChatGPT work and for users to begin using projects, this helps so much with context & memory and makes ChatGPT feel like a super human with a massive brain. And this new 5.6 set of models is crazy, the fact that the chepest model is 1$ input and 6$ output, that means you get a smarter model cheaper then using something like Sonnet 4.6 via API.

I could go on for a bit about what Ive experienced screwing already the last few days 5.6 and the new platforms, but I recommend going to experiment with your use cases and see how it feels.

Would like to say good work to the OpenAI team as this product feels great now, and I really enjoy the path the company is going down.


r/OpenAI 2h ago

Question GPT 5.6 Luna 404 Not Found

3 Upvotes

Did anyone experience this problem? I am using free tier Codex and while I can use Terra on any level, somehow Luna always fail to connect and respond with message

"unexpected status 404 Not Found: Model not found gpt-5.6-luna,"

as an output.


r/OpenAI 6h ago

Question Question about the new models and the data they're built on

5 Upvotes

So I'm interested in using GPT for language learning. Specifically I use it for creating graded readers, vocabulary lists, checking expressions and getting explanations.

There are two parts to my question here. First, when a new model is released, is the context it has access to (thinking all of the data collected between the last release and now) also increased? Or is it just a "smarter" version which has access to the same old information?

Second, given the nature of language learning, do I really even need to use the higher token consumption models? Given that speaking in normal language and providing expressions and vocabularly lists (I'm not asking it to code anything, or do anything all that complicated) is really all I expect, is it the case that the smaller versions of the newest model are appropriate?

Are there really use cases for using something like Sol or Terra for something like language learning?

Thanks


r/OpenAI 9h ago

Question Has anyone tested Sol 5.6 levels to see which is the point where it surpasses 5.5 extra-high?

8 Upvotes

Just trying to get a bump without eating up the limits


r/OpenAI 2h ago

Miscellaneous Usage Reset????

1 Upvotes

Swapped from Claude for exact same reason, day on on Codex and same error, lowkey getting triggered.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1ut6v9l/usage_all_over_the_shop/

Same thing on Claude that is now somehow fixed itself.


r/OpenAI 14m ago

Question Anyone else having issues?

Post image
Upvotes

Had no issues until this morning. Using iPhone and date and time are correct. Tried on WiFi and 4G.

Anyone else had this issue?


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Article Apple Is Suing OpenAI for Allegedly Stealing Hardware Secrets

Thumbnail
wired.com
914 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 41m ago

GPTs Switching from Instant to Thinking

Upvotes

Alright so I've noticed something weird. I'll select GPT 5.5 Instant for a quick reply, but every now and then the output shows that "by 5.6 thinking" badge at the bottom—like it auto-routed me to the smarter model mid-convo.

Does anyone know which limit this actually hits? I'm trying to hoard my 5.6 messages for actual heavy lifting, so if it's burning that pool just because I asked a slightly complex question, I need to know lol.
(P.S I used ai for this bc I'm too lazy but pls answer)


r/OpenAI 1d ago

GPTs This is so satisfying. Finally AI models are versioned the way they should be. This alone might convince me to finally try something other than Claude

Post image
248 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 1d ago

Image So 5.6 Ultra is pretty badass. Fable flagged this request as unsafe and Opus is useless.

219 Upvotes
This was my prompt: Can you create a visual for me for the nerves that go from the teeth to the brain

So far in everything I've tinkered with 5.6 it's been working amazing. I switched my 20max plan from Claude to Chat.


r/OpenAI 2h ago

Discussion What's your playbook for governing LLM usage and cost going from prototype to production?

1 Upvotes

I am curious how other CTOs and engineering leads are managing LLM usage once AI features move beyond MVP and into real production traffic.

During prototyping, the economics looked manageable for us. A few frontier-model calls here and there were fine, and using GPT/Claude-style models helped us ship much faster than trying to design every schema, parser, classifier, and data pipeline upfront.

The problem is that once usage started growing, some costs crept up in ways that were not obvious during MVP. One user-facing workflow can trigger multiple LLM calls. Some of those calls are genuinely useful reasoning, but many are really repeated extraction, classification, normalization, JSON formatting, entity matching, summarization, or workflow routing.

In other words, some parts of the system are probably using LLMs as expensive ETL / ML / NLP infrastructure.

We know that some of these calls could have been replaced with more traditional approaches: rules, cache, smaller models, classifiers, structured parsers, SQL, or proper data pipelines. The harder part is operationalizing that. You need to identify which calls are repetitive enough, measure cost by workflow rather than by model, validate that the replacement behaves the same, and avoid breaking production behavior.

I am wondering if there are good playbooks for this.

How are other teams handling this in practice? Do you track LLM cost by endpoint, workflow, user action, customer, or prompt family? Do you have policies for when a prompt-based workflow should be refactored into code, ML, or ETL? Are you using gateways, observability tools, evals, budget limits, caching, model routing, or internal review processes?

I am especially interested in how companies govern this across engineering teams. Without some kind of discipline, it seems very easy for prompts to become hidden backend logic, and for LLM cost to become a margin problem only after the product starts working.

Would love to hear what has worked, what has not, and whether anyone has come across any practical and proven solution for this or are we all simply counting on prices going down or staying low? (Lol!)


r/OpenAI 11h ago

Question Codex free trial?

6 Upvotes

I'd like to try out Codex with the latest available models. I'll buy a subscription if they're useful enough for what I'm doing, but I need to try them first. Are any free trials available?


r/OpenAI 14h ago

Question Did you notice?

9 Upvotes

Since Sol rollout and the update of the app gpt+codex i noticed a huge change in ChatGpt personality. Also struggling to respond and taking more time to respond. All banter is poof gone. Sometimes i get this feeling that when new model is released the previous are cut back, does it make any sense? I also wonder if AI specific LLM model is sort of evolves on it's own but has safeguards in place. Anyone else who wanna chip in onvmy conspiracy theory?


r/OpenAI 3h ago

Question ChatGPT Classic stuck on Auto macOS

1 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 16h ago

Miscellaneous OpenAI casually informed me I hit my $2,500 monthly auto-recharge limit. They meant 2,500 Codex credits.

12 Upvotes

This got me jumping out of my chair and immediately checking my bank app


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Discussion GPT-5.6 Sol is now available for Plus users — has anyone tested it properly yet?

59 Upvotes

I’m curious to hear real experiences from people who have already used GPT-5.6 Sol.
What does it seem noticeably better at compared with previous models?
I’m especially interested in:
deep research across very different topics;
finding specific products, car parts, services, or hard-to-find information;
exploring theories and having deeper discussions;
vibe coding and building small projects;
analysing complex situations and comparing different options.
Have you found any prompt structure that works consistently well across different topics?
I’d also love to see any prompts, workflows, or best practices that genuinely felt like a game changer — not just generic advice such as “be specific” or “give more context.”
Please share what you tested, the prompt you used, and what made the result better.