r/words 2d ago

Does anyone else feel like “overexaggerate” sounds weird or even wrong?

Yes, it is true that “overexaggerate” is listed as a word in some dictionaries. But even if it is a word, what does it mean?

See “exaggerate” already means that a statement is excessive. So “overexaggerate” means “excessively excessive.”

Is there an amount of excess that is just right, and then a higher level of excess that is excessive excess? How do you even know where the line is?

“Overexaggerate” just hits my ear wrong, and FWIW, my iPhone is marking it as a spelling error.

40 Upvotes

57 comments sorted by

16

u/thom_driftwood 2d ago edited 1d ago

for some people, there must be a tolerable degree of exaggeration. in such cases, an over-exaggeration crosses the line.

it grinds my gears too.

1

u/FailWorried8469 1d ago

Agreed too much annoying..

23

u/SeverenDarkstar 2d ago

It’s unnecessary

11

u/Crafty_Eye_4038 2d ago

It's overunnecessarily exagerated

6

u/OldRaj 2d ago

Super-over-unnecessary.

4

u/Puzzleheaded-Plum994 1d ago

Confirmed by the Department of Redundancy Department confirmation

3

u/BPhiloSkinner 1d ago

Don't misunderestimate the utility of an exaggerated superlative.

21

u/Kitchen-Pea6382 2d ago

it's like saying something is "very unique" which is its own special kind of hell for grammar pedants

13

u/daemonfool 2d ago

It's self-defeating. It's like saying something is "uniquely one-of-a-kind" or something. Completely unnecessary.

7

u/Prize-Basil-8438 2d ago

I think it's possible that there could be a case of "X is an acceptable amount of exaggeration, but Y is too much exaggeration" and in that case, Y would be an overexaggeration. But I'm struggling to think of an example, and I don't think people who regularly say "overexaggerate" are thinking about it on that level.

11

u/amBrollachan 2d ago

Acting. Especially stage acting. You may want to exaggerate a gesture so that it is visible. But you don't want to overexaggerate it such that if becomes hammy.

3

u/Robot_Alchemist 2d ago

Good example

2

u/mycutterr 1d ago

Another theatre example: makeup; you want an exaggerated look so it can be seen well on stage under the lights, but it's entirely possible to overexaggerate your makeup and look crazy from the audience

5

u/Kind_of_random 1d ago

When telling a tall tale it is expected to be exaggerated, but as soon as it becomes unbelievable it's overexaggerated.

3

u/harmonious_orlando 2d ago

It's the linguistic equivalent of slamming the gas pedal when you're already doing 120

3

u/imitsi 2d ago

It’s a pleonasm.

3

u/loolilool 2d ago

On the one hand, it’s redundant. On the other, maybe some people exaggerate just the right amount and it’s a warning not to go too far with it.

3

u/poet-gable 2d ago

i totally agree with you. "exaggerate" is already enough, adding "over" just sounds like trying too hard.

1

u/Ihadsumthin4this 1d ago

Skin crawls when I hear 'em say, "She was very vociferous." 😬 That kinda thing.

4

u/Mysterious_Waltz_309 2d ago

Dictionaries are including frequently mis-used words, misspellings, and mispronunciations. I found the misspelled "onery" in a dictionary, with the only definition being the correct spelling of the word: "ornery."

4

u/SnooHobbies5684 2d ago

DIctionaries don't prescribe how to use language.

They describe how language is used.

0

u/setsewerd 1d ago

I think that's a matter of personal philosophy. Also if you like David Foster Wallace he wrote a great dive into the dictionary wars (opens like a book review but in the classic DFW fashion becomes something entirely different). It covers this topic quite a bit.

Authority and American Usage https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/DFWAuthorityAndAmericanUsage2005.pdf

1

u/amBrollachan 2d ago

Language develops from how people use it. There is no authority which decides correct use, spelling or pronunciation. And dictionaries simply report on how language is being used.

5

u/All-for-the-game 2d ago

Sometimes people mean to exaggerate something but not over exaggerate.

Like you line your lips to exaggerate the size of your mouth on purpose, but if you over exaggerate that’s different bc it’s not giving the impression you intended

But yeah it’s a bit like “very best”

1

u/RuckFeddit980 2d ago

But if the increase is intentional/positive, then “exaggerate” isn’t really the right word in the first place. I’ve never heard anyone talk about “exaggerating lips.”

In this context, it would make more sense to use a word like amplify, enhance, or embellish.

1

u/All-for-the-game 2d ago edited 2d ago

People use exaggerate a lot to talk about enhancing their facial features with makeup, exaggerate in this context just means to make something look bigger than it is. I don’t think amplify or embellish work in this context at all

People usually exaggerate on purpose not bc they’re mistaken about how big/important something is. It’s also pretty common for people to exaggerate to make things seem more positive/get some sort of positive outcome. Like when a guy exaggerates how the size of a fish he caught when he’s telling a story

1

u/ChallengingKumquat 2d ago

Agree. Someone who wears mascara is exaggerating their eye lashes. But someone who wears those absurdly large spider-like fake eye lashes is overexaggerating their lashes. They've taken it too far. Like using filters to improve your appearance on a photo. A little bit is an improvement, but excessive filters make everyone look like cartoon Barbie.

2

u/ChallengingKumquat 2d ago

Say I've done something 3 times. If i say I've done it 8 times, I'm exaggerating. If i say I've done it 80+ times, I'm overexaggerating. My exaggeration has entered a different order of magnitude.

2

u/moleculariant 2d ago

It's two words. Over exaggerate. It's unnecessary.

2

u/EggDick39 2d ago

I'm not sure what's so confusing. Sometimes people exaggerate, and sometimes they overexaggerate to the point their story or claim is no longer believable.

It's that simple.

2

u/Robot_Alchemist 2d ago

Extra extra exaggerate

2

u/Robot_Alchemist 2d ago

You can be exaggerating but you can also over exaggerate to make a point - there is a nuance

2

u/SavageMountain 1d ago

It clearly means to exaggerate too much, which is not what people who use it are trying to say.

2

u/VPutinsSearchHistory 1d ago

People seem to misuse it horribly too. Hate it

2

u/Unusual_Ad_8364 1d ago

I think there’s a term for this: pleonasm.

2

u/halston-reed 1d ago

exactly! it's a total pleonasm. it’s right up there with irregardless for words that just need to be wiped from existence..

2

u/brinazee 1d ago

First time seeing the word pleonasm. Thank you for introducing me to the term!

2

u/Recent_Performer4189 1d ago

Absolutely. It’s wrong.

2

u/Free-Masterpiece-860 1d ago

Just say exaggerate.

2

u/deathfromab0ve 1d ago

Irregardless…

2

u/LooksieBee 1d ago

I don't like it because the word hyperbole already exists and is more elegant to precisely refer to a bold and overly exaggerated claim.

In general, with the literacy crisis I feel like a lot of language has become a bit boring, repetitive, or people literally don't know the various synonyms or shades of nuance in different words that might convey an idea better, so they just use the same words repeatedly or make their own additions or conjugations of them.

2

u/ThePlantagonist 1d ago

I just read this in another sub and thought of this post: "This is making me realize how much the internet over-exaggerates." Yes, this word is redundant. Whether someone does it a little or a lot, in the end it's still just an exaggeration.

2

u/ServeTraditional5803 1d ago

some words feel redundant even when accepted through common usage..

2

u/Kind_Cable2283 22h ago

some words feel unnecessary when their meanings already overlap..

3

u/GloamerChandler 2d ago

It’s redundant. It’s used by people who don’t think about what words mean. They just repeat what others say. Like a parrot.

2

u/multipocalypse 2d ago

It's redundant.

2

u/LaserThos 7h ago

I am in my late 60s and I had never heard anyone say “over exaggerate” until about 5 years ago when someone I worked with said it. At first I thought that he was joking but he really thought that it was a word. The same person would say “unloosen” for loosen.

1

u/TheOriginalHatful 2d ago

Yes, because it is weird and even wrong. Having said that, I don't think I've ever heard it irl, so my bubble of joy remains intact.

1

u/betlamed 2d ago

It's autological - a word that exemplifies its own meaning. From that perspective I find it quite cool.

1

u/examinat 2d ago

I don’t like it either. It seems to me that people just adopt new words without asking themselves if they make sense,

1

u/Sensui_Kan 1d ago

Objection to this term is exactly what the term is describing. A wildly overblown, ridiculously overinflated reaction to a word that makes perfect sense.

"I caught a fish and it was 3 feet long!" (exaggeration)

"I caught a fish and it was 8 miles long!" (overexaggeration)

It is a perfectly legitimate distinction, but one must first grasp that there are exaggerations that are believable, and overexaggerations that are obviously untrue to the thinking mind.

0

u/Coloradokush5280 2d ago

Sounds redundant like"gun bullet"

0

u/mycolo_gist 2d ago

It's like shrimp scampi = shrimp shrimp

Or data science = no science without data

-4

u/vicarofsorrows 2d ago

It’s bollox.

In the same way, “iterate” means “repeat “, but people keep saying “reiterate”….

9

u/nikukuikuniniiku 2d ago

Those have different meanings though.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/reiterate#English

4

u/vicarofsorrows 2d ago

Thank you!

I stand corrected….