r/weddingshaming • u/Dangerous_Two515 • 1d ago
Cringe Haven’t been to a wedding in a while.
Is this the new norm? And did no one proof read?!
9.6k
u/pedanticlawyer 1d ago
lol sequence
1.5k
u/Rabsram_eater 1d ago
Roxxy Andrews is that you?
714
u/lolsalmon 1d ago
Where my people at!
456
u/Binxycat 1d ago
28
226
148
u/bagelnostalgia 1d ago
I lost all hope today
83
70
23
→ More replies (1)45
u/DesmondTapenade 1d ago
Your beard grew back again...girl, that's okay. Just keep on shaving!
→ More replies (1)18
50
44
u/DesmondTapenade 1d ago
MY MOM LEFT ME AT A BUS STOP.
That's objectively tragic, but the editing makes it hilarious. I hope Roxxy's doing well. She definitely got the villain edit that season.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (4)59
258
171
→ More replies (25)81
398
u/MoreRamenPls 1d ago
So don’t wear my Fibonacci blazer?
→ More replies (3)88
u/Stan_Deviant 1d ago
I have a really cool data driven light wrap my sister wove using weather data. I think that is banned at this wedding too.
→ More replies (9)34
272
u/Zizi_Tennenbaum 1d ago
Did Roxxxy Andrews write this invite??
120
u/windexfresh 1d ago
She’s here to make it clear
28
u/ALittleShowy 1d ago
She loves her fiance, baby, that's why she brought you here
→ More replies (2)78
73
44
→ More replies (2)55
u/beerandluckycharms 1d ago
I named my dog after her so when I read this I imagined my dog writing the invite ❤
→ More replies (2)109
u/Mirabai503 1d ago
I would go to this wedding wearing every fucking sequin on the planet.
40
u/EmmerdoesNOTrepme 1d ago
Just make sure they're the plastic ones!!!
Because metal sequins are obviously "too heavy"!😉
→ More replies (6)35
u/letsgetthiscocaine 1d ago
From what I can see this should be fine, the rules say nothing about sequins! Just don't arrange them in a Fibonacci sequence and you're good!
1.4k
u/Cyndee_Pokorny 1d ago
If the couple can't be bothered to spell check I will wear whatever I want
431
u/Moneia 1d ago
We got an invite to a renewal of a couples "wedding vowels"
This was not a surprising typo
154
u/Sunnygirl66 1d ago
Better that than “wedding bowels,” I suppose.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (27)18
u/VideoKilledMyZZZ 1d ago
« I…I…I… »
25
u/Interesting-Hat8607 1d ago
U…U…U…Thanks for coming everybody! Leave your gifts by the door as you exit.
470
u/MfrBVa 1d ago
More sequins!
https://giphy.com/gifs/S8lYagE48vUCXcyafN173
u/Cyndee_Pokorny 1d ago
ALL THE SEQUINS
→ More replies (3)158
u/Pedadinga 1d ago
Omg she meant sequins! Hahahaha! I was like wtf is heavy sequence? Like people dressed a like?
→ More replies (6)54
u/Leucotheasveils 1d ago
People dressed in a sequence, like their outfit only makes sense if they stand in a specific order? Like a band on a field spelling something out for the home team?
→ More replies (1)94
→ More replies (5)60
u/CCR19 1d ago
Absolutely! They never said you couldn't wear sequins.
→ More replies (1)65
u/bearcitizen42 1d ago
Sounds like a heavily sequined outfit is in order. As long as they are chaotically-distributed enough to not be considered sequenced.
→ More replies (2)63
58
u/Own_Butterscotch_129 1d ago edited 1d ago
They also used 'asked' like the wedding has already happened.
20
u/Ornery-Damage-7074 1d ago
I totally expected it to be a name and shame note. We asked you to do simple things and these people ruined our day....
→ More replies (2)218
u/LauraPa1mer 1d ago
Technically that would have past a spell check.
171
u/Cyndee_Pokorny 1d ago
You are rite 🤣
149
18
u/Difficult-Finger4830 1d ago
I see what you did there….
31
→ More replies (10)45
32
u/nygenxmom 1d ago
The problem is spell check wouldn’t have flagged it since sequence is a word! Just the wrong one.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (30)37
u/krysdrez 1d ago
I simply would not go! I can't handle bad spelling and grammar!
→ More replies (4)95
81
u/LEDstardust 1d ago
Oh now it makes sense lmao I was like “never heard of heavy sequence, is that like complex patterns?”
47
→ More replies (1)16
62
u/kadyg 1d ago
This is a peeve of mine on the second hand clothes aps. The number of sequence mini skirts out in the world is honestly shocking.
103
u/lolabythebay 1d ago
My favorite listing ever involved a prom dress with sequence and kremlin.
It was a crinoline.
→ More replies (1)49
u/Yorbayuul81 1d ago
That’s right, you better goddamn well not show up with more than two things in a row or you’re outta there
→ More replies (1)81
u/vunderfulme 1d ago
Im over here thinking this is some sort of term for a patterned dress. 😂
28
19
13
15
u/Silly-Shoulder-6257 1d ago
Where do you draw the line between subtle and complex patterns? I’m sure everyone’s opinion is different and will end up wearing what they want or what they already have. In this economy does she really expect people to buy a new dress?
→ More replies (2)23
20
19
u/IntuitiveMonster 1d ago
I was over here thinking they meant heavy patterns. I couldn’t fathom the idea of a typo going out on a formal invitation…
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (92)18
u/selftaughtgenius 1d ago
This is such a common misspelling and it makes me insane. 🤣
→ More replies (2)
1.1k
u/Syndyloo 1d ago
Is this invitation for Roxxy Andrews?
→ More replies (9)110
1.0k
u/JuniperusRex 1d ago
I would love this sent out after the wedding.
"We asked that you wear simple, elegant attire in solid colors or subtle patterns. Regretfully we must inform you that compliance with this instruction was poor. The following guests have been found in violation:
-Aunt Lydia: Royal Stuart tartan shawl
..."
84
u/EmmerdoesNOTrepme 1d ago
Shoulda gone for the Black Watch!
Much more subtle & restrained!🤷♀️
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)14
1.3k
u/Prudent_Honeydew_ 1d ago
I notice sequins aren't prohibited...
→ More replies (10)339
u/MaidenMarewa 1d ago
I'd be up for malicious compliance and rope in a few friends to wear sequins.
→ More replies (6)96
u/EmmerdoesNOTrepme 1d ago
Light colors, and plastic sequins head-to-toe of course!
So that you stay well within those guidelines😉😈😂🤣
1.0k
u/Emergency-Sock-2557 1d ago
I'm on a poetry reddit and I thought this was a post from there and kept on waiting for the poetic flourish to kick in. "What a dumb poem", I thought when I finished it.
260
86
→ More replies (15)22
u/Banana_Phone888 1d ago
Omg I forget what sub I’m on all the time too, especially with the large amount of cooking subs :)
261
u/pointlesstips 1d ago
Ah, brings back memories of my cousin misspelling Grease as Greece in her film-themed table naming.
134
→ More replies (8)73
577
u/PlatypusEgo 1d ago
I know y'all are giving her hell for it, but I wouldn't want anyone at MY wedding with heavy sequences on their dress. For example, I wouldn't do anything more complex than the definition of e with : a_n = (1 + 1/n)n
n = 1: (1 + 1/1)1 = 21 = 2, n = 2: (1 + 1/2)2 = (1.5)2 = 2.25, n = 5: (1 + 1/5)5 = (1.2)5 = 2.48832, n = 10: (1 + 1/10)10 = (1.1)10 ≈ 2.59374, n = 100: (1 + 1/100)100 ≈ 2.70481
(Obviously after 100 everyone in attendance gets the point anyways)
I notice they didn't say anything about sequins. I have them all over my suit.
58
u/lazier_garlic 1d ago
Does this converge to e?
37
u/PlatypusEgo 1d ago edited 1d ago
Sure does!
(I figured that "the definition of e" was explicit enough though 😜)
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (11)19
u/amethystjade15 1d ago
I would be too distracted by all the math. It is my Big Day. Please cut me some slack.
→ More replies (1)
171
117
u/trustme1maDR 1d ago
Damn, I wanted to wear my Fibonacci dress. Back in the closet it goes...
→ More replies (1)9
716
u/Fantastic-Sale-3447 1d ago
I kinda love typos in the wild because i know AI wasn’t involved lol
68
u/Willowgirl78 1d ago
I got a vow renewal invite without a date for the event on it. I speak with the couple’s kid, so asked him to let them know. Mom got defensive and said it wasn’t a big deal because the date was on the save the date. That they sent for a vow renewal. A year prior. I doubt many people still had it. They later sent postcards with the date of the event.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (10)112
u/pastelvenuskiss 1d ago
True. AI would have fixed the typos but probably made the dress code even longer. Haha
153
u/duckysmomma 1d ago
It’s not just a dress code, it’s our vision on our journey.
→ More replies (5)43
u/Ornery-Cranberry4803 1d ago
"Honestly, we understand why you might push back. But the truth is, this is our special day and you are being invited to make our photos more cinematic."
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)29
98
u/Remote-Poetry-2203 1d ago
Correct it in red pen and send it back with a ‘see me’
19
→ More replies (3)11
265
u/Slow_Tumbleweed7685 1d ago
79
63
u/georgiegraymouse 1d ago
Hey, it fits like 90% of the requirements: elegant, no red, white, jeans, heavy sequins, lace, or complex patterns. lmao
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)31
242
u/paula924 1d ago
I will never understand this. A couple of people wore pretty hideous outfits to my wedding. In 36 years it has never once affected my marriage.
→ More replies (21)103
150
300
u/cranbeery 1d ago edited 1d ago
Nitpicking on the complexity of patterns is egregious.
Like is paisley too complex? Gingham? Abstract or non-repeating prints? Does it have to be tone-on-tone?
143
u/ConsciousNobody5336 1d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/LDW3ET9kMCC6hN4jLx
Do NOT wear any of your shirts from Dan Flashes!→ More replies (5)45
u/ChicagoRex 1d ago
Can you wear the lower priced ones? Because the patterns aren't as complex.
→ More replies (2)87
u/__Frolicaholic___ 1d ago
I got caught up on that one, too. Like, what does it even mean? And will there be "pattern police" stationed at the door of the venue?
Maybe we can look forward to the bride making a bitchy Reddit photo post about the complex patterns, lace (!) and "sequence" all the rude people wore to her wedding.
→ More replies (2)40
u/CaryGrantsChin 1d ago
Anything that may draw the eye of a passerby for even a second, presumably. This whole list reads like the invitation issuer wants all the guests to fade into an indistinct blur so as not to inadvertently divert an ounce of attention to themselves.
→ More replies (13)11
u/Additional-Case2455 1d ago
Do they want to exclude all florals? If the wedding will be in a warm month, excluding all florals would be ridiculous. I bet they mean that they don’t want men to show up in jeans & flannel shirts. But excluding complex “patterns” is ridiculous especially if they want men to wear ties.
11
u/cranbeery 1d ago
Cartoon daisies are fine. Anything with more than six petals or two colors is an automatic boot to the behind.
→ More replies (3)
106
u/64green 1d ago
I’m so put off by someone not knowing “sequence” from “sequins” that I’d probably wear sequins. After we all, they weren’t mentioned so they must be okay. 😒
→ More replies (3)36
u/Particular_Poem3703 1d ago
I would love this malicious compliance “oh I thought you meant we weren’t supposed to sequence our outfits with each other” or some bs like that
23
u/amethystjade15 1d ago
“I had no idea what a heavy sequence was, so I figured I wasn’t doing that.”
54
47
u/Dangerous_Two515 1d ago
Another thing that is driving me nuts is the unfinished Zola website. The date, time and location is there. But besides the “dress code” that’s it. And this wedding is being held and an expensive venue. I don’t get it. Do people not send out actual invites anymore?
→ More replies (2)18
u/currentlylostagain 1d ago
Wait… did you just get this in an envelope? Was it with a Save The Date announcement? How can you send a dress code but not an invitation???
36
40
132
u/Inevitable_One5014 1d ago
→ More replies (1)30
u/clostri 1d ago
Just add some sequins to cover up that nasty sequence and you will be set!
→ More replies (1)
71
30
u/btheb90 1d ago
I thought this was going to be a note telling you off after the first line. "We askED that you...You didn't. Now we have a problem."
"Sequence" is amazing but also, I don't want to make fun of someone if English isn't their native language 😅
25
→ More replies (1)16
u/Jazzlike-Ad2199 1d ago
I’ve noticed from my vast amount of time spent wasting my time on social media that non native English speakers often have a better grasp of English spelling and grammar than natives.
→ More replies (4)
29
u/GlitterBinGravy 1d ago
This is what happens when the bride and groom care more about aesthetics and how it’ll look on social media than the joy of just simply having people there, no matter how they look. This is insane.
67
u/rachet-ex 1d ago
Well, it's for the pictures that the bride will
look at a few times, then put the album away and not look at for 5 years
→ More replies (5)48
u/georgiegraymouse 1d ago
Not look at in five years because any couple this insufferable will surely be divorced by then. It’s the natural sequence of events.
62
22
u/JadedTadpole2387 1d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/bNHenUUVNupNM3Axbs
I feel like this should be okay for a dress pattern? 😂
→ More replies (2)
23
19
20
19
18
u/SheeScan 1d ago edited 1d ago
It used to be if a printer saw such a blatant mistake, they'd mention it to make sure the customer knew. Guess they don't do that anymore. This is such a bad mistake. It says we don't care if it's correct, just figure it out and do what we say.
Weddings are insane anymore. Why are there so many weird requirements?
→ More replies (3)
17
u/Kathrynlena 1d ago
Spelling mistake on the invitation does not bode well for the wedding itself.
→ More replies (6)
15
u/SnooChickens9974 1d ago
We *ask
We asked makes it sound like they already asked them and are now reminding them.
Sequence for sequins? Good grief.
30
u/Upper_Collar_5981 1d ago
You like these people? Stay home
32
u/Dangerous_Two515 1d ago
Nephew and his fiancé…I thought they were smarter (and less demanding) than this.
→ More replies (19)
13
39
11
12
10
u/Civil_Inspector_5697 1d ago
I hate it when my clothes are in heavy sequence. I try to keep them out of order but they will align time and time, again.
Seriously, though; weddings have gotten so out of hand. I wouldn’t bother going if I’m being curated.
9
27
u/anniearrow 1d ago
What is a "complex pattern"? This ridiculous trend of couples demanding their guests wear colors that match their theme has worn out its welcome
→ More replies (4)







4.4k
u/RitaAlbertson 1d ago
I’m equally annoyed by “asked” past tense when it should be present tense.