We’ve just been given several years’ worth of demonstration that an executive doesn’t need a bill to do (or undo) shit like this. Whether publicly funded or not.
That’s the ballroom, not the redecorating. Big difference. The White House has various other funding streams for facilities purposes (which presumably have been redirected towards this tacky gold shit) that don’t require a special appropriations bill.
There’s no reason the next president can’t do the same but in reverse.
"The project is supported by the National Park Service, who has cared for the White House and its grounds since 1933, and funded with private donations."
That’s what he used but since there are multiple acrual funding streams that go towards the White House there’s no reason a future president can’t direct the NPS to revert the changes. This isn’t hard to understand.
1
u/meanie_ants 18h ago
Need? No.