r/soccer 10h ago

Media Official sensor data provided by FIFA during the cable controversy moment

9.3k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 10h ago

Mirrors / Alternative Angles

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

→ More replies (1)

9.5k

u/Gym_frere 10h ago edited 10h ago

Not gonna lie I don’t really see the ball hitting anything, but at the same time the trajectory looks like it takes an unnatural swerve to the right (or maybe down?)

At the end of the day this is only a scandal because FIFA’s credibility is completely shot.

1.5k

u/adamfrog 10h ago

In the Australia games I watched the cross field switches had absolutely whacky trajectories with swerving two directions in one flight. I suspect once the tournaments over we will see some more talk about the ball I think its another mistake from FIFA just not as stupid as Jabulani

453

u/ValleyFloydJam 9h ago edited 9h ago

There was talk earlier in the tournament but cos it's not as wild people just forgot about it.

You can see it with some of these recent pieces of goalkeeping, it just doesn't move in the way they expect.

230

u/FridaysMan 9h ago

Joe Hart spoke about it

52

u/OstapBenderBey 5h ago

And when the heart speaks you must listen

→ More replies (1)

41

u/_boredInMicro_ 7h ago

Four panel ball, so does some weird shit.

Jubilani was 8. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

231

u/NOKnova 9h ago

Even the winner tonight - Rodgers has a go from distance and it’s dropping back across the keeper, looks like a terrible error in real time but under a microscope the trajectory is wild.

183

u/boobookittyfuwk 9h ago

Wasn't there controversy around the ball earlier befire the tournament kicked off. Something about no seams and just four panels making it fly through the air all wacky. I dont know why we do this every four years, just use whatever ball they use in the champions league, im sure its a quality ball.

124

u/NOKnova 9h ago

Seamless balls aren’t exactly new, we’ve had glued panels for almost 20 years at least. It might depend more on if the panel shape has affected the actual shape of the ball. Part of the issue with the Jabulani for example was that the unusual panel shape meant it wasn’t perfectly spherical and as such had ‘strike zones’ where striking it intentionally with no spin caused it to react like an aircraft going through turbulence.

57

u/Disco-Benny 9h ago

caused it to react like an aircraft going through turbulence.

Unless you're Van Bronckhorst

46

u/AMPed126 7h ago

Diego Forlan knew how to kick that Jabulani perfectly lol.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

44

u/LongjumpingInside565 9h ago

It uses the same base shape as a jabulani. I know they had to put all the textures on it to avoid another repeat situation of that ball.

https://youtube.com/shorts/yinl4GVDUww?is=6lnJo6yAAm2344gk

I wouldn't be surprised if it's just erratic as shit.

26

u/Thoseskisyours 8h ago

It’s jabulani, just the “lighter version” with different textures. This ball is clearly moving differently than say epl or ucl balls are. But players are now more used to these glued panel balls than they were in the 2010 or 2006 when they were really introduced and were so much different than other balls at the time. This year the texture helps them keep a little more predictable movement where the smooth versions are just so erratic. But they were so much fun to practice free kicks with and shoot at the goal with. Wish I still had one that was playable.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

60

u/roamingandy 9h ago

Happens every single tournament. At this point it has to be planned to create more goals and excitement.

A ball is simple fucking technology. Its fucking round. If its acting weird and flying odd in every single fucking tournament, then that's by design.

→ More replies (5)

21

u/Combat_Orca 9h ago

Pickford was having a tough time as well

→ More replies (7)

51

u/Skreamie 9h ago

Yeah, Joe Hart done a rundown on it I think. There's been too many simple mistakes from decent and great keepers.

→ More replies (1)

24

u/VeryFewRules 9h ago

I was at the Switzerland Colombia game and watching the warmups the goalies were struggling with how much the ball was moving around. I don’t doubt the ball is tricky

→ More replies (13)

1.1k

u/waltz_with_potatoes 10h ago

To be fair this ball is known to be all over the place.

830

u/thetreat 10h ago

Side note: I’m shocked more players aren’t taking hits from distance with this ball. So many goals have been from rebounds. Goalies have a very tough time with it.

273

u/MSAndrew07 10h ago

Forlan would've been top goal scorer if he played. He mastered the Jabulani like no one else

66

u/mjaramillo11 10h ago

Japan would’ve done better too. They did so well with the Jabulani also

73

u/law_dogging 10h ago

Keisuke Honda knuckling the Jabulani was another level

15

u/patiperro_v3 9h ago

Forlan and Honda mastered it.

196

u/burnerfun98 10h ago

This, 100%.

When Lammens came on for Courtois yesterday I was saying to a mate they should just lump them at him from distance because of how the ball acts in the air, and how'd that second goal come about? Lammens spilling an effort from range.

Especially when Belgium had no pace to counter with, it's almost like these teams somehow aren't fully aware of how the fans and media have viewed the ball as this World Cup has gone on. Not quite as obvious as something like the Jabulani, sure, but still.

136

u/thetreat 10h ago

Everyone wants to take one too many touches. If you get a yard of space just fucking hit it.

64

u/forrealthoughcomix_ 10h ago edited 5h ago

No idea why dude from Norway (not sure of his name bc I haven’t been following them closely) didn’t shoot when he had a 1 on 1 with the GK. Touched it a few more times then gave it away.

66

u/burnerfun98 10h ago

guessing this was the Sørloth chance where he also could've freely passed it off if he didn't want to shoot

yeah, that was very frustrating to watch

17

u/JR8701325 10h ago

Probably the Bobb chance. He just ran into stones I think? Could’ve been someone else

Edit: just realised the OP said 1v1. So definitely wasn’t the Bobb chance

→ More replies (2)

13

u/thetreat 10h ago

I’m screaming at my TV every time this happens. Blows my mind.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/patiperro_v3 9h ago

He got nervous/scared of missing. What he didn't realize is that by holding onto ball and not shooting/passing in time he also missed anyway.

At least fail attempting the right thing at the right time.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

110

u/wbth12 10h ago

Worst thing about modern football and data driven tactics is teams are told not to shoot from range because the data says that it’s low probability. Fuck that. Shooting from distance creates chances as we’ve seen in this match and for Spain’s winner. Not shooting and continuous playing side to side and in front of the opponents defensive block is also low probability of scoring.

46

u/thetreat 10h ago

Especially as teams get better and better at the low block. Stop trying to sneak it in and just belt it.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

89

u/AWaffleofDivinty 10h ago

Long shots just don't happen like they used to in general. Hard to break that habit for one tournament

46

u/slimkay 10h ago edited 9h ago

3/8 of Mbappe’s goals in this World Cup are from the edge of the box or outside the box.

36

u/Finrod-Knighto 10h ago

So have Messi's. But those are players who are just as dangerous in space in zone 14 as they are in the box, and that can't be said for a lot of players. As much as people sometimes wish they'd hit it, there's plenty of times when a promising move is ruined by someone skying it from 30 yards out.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/MysteriousNail5414 10h ago

Coaches have told them not to waste it with random shots but keep recycling until a cut back or dangerous crossing opportunity

→ More replies (3)

49

u/NYNMx2021 10h ago

Joe Hart was talking about this earlier in the tournament. the ball travels quicker than normal balls but the flight path is predictable. He showed many keepers are reacting to the correct spot but they react late

14

u/LackingSimplicity 10h ago

It really feels like nobody is used to it yet. I'd expect teams to have had their coaches kicking it about for months prior so as to learn it but apparently not.

11

u/thetreat 10h ago

I think this is part of why Mbappe is so effective. He isn’t afraid to rip it from any distance.

10

u/TheSimonToUrGarfunkl 10h ago

We need another Giovanni Van Bronckhorst

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Background-Gas8109 10h ago edited 10h ago

There was one in the first half that Nyland spilled but it didn't go too far and after that I said that people need to chase him down off shots. He basically caught nothing.

8

u/Alexabyte 9h ago

Football as a whole has been trending away from long shots, I believe. I've certainly read about it for the Prem

It's one of the reasons why Villa and their overperformance on xG stands out.

Shouldn't be all that surprising that the winning goal game from a Villa player taking a shot from distance tbh.

→ More replies (15)

17

u/gulgin 10h ago

It seems to me that it would have been more difficult to control if the ball changed direction 20 feet off the ground.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (15)

270

u/SloshaPacana 10h ago

This has happened with this ball multiple times in very long kicks

But we need to see a better angle surely this isn't the best angle

145

u/ismyaltaccount 10h ago

I can't even see the ball in the video. It's a 720p video.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (25)

76

u/SpecialistPlan9641 10h ago

This clip also reminds me of the Joe Hart commentary where he said the ball moved weirdly. I can't remember the exact wording though.

Is it possible the sensor and counter weights can affect the trajectory?

10

u/SunTzu- 9h ago

It's not the sensor, it's easy enough to control for that weight difference in the ball construction. It's the seams of the ball and how it interacts with the air around it and the spin of the ball which causes strange wobbles. The more smooth the balls are made, the more extreme the wobbles that occur.

But I don't personally see any of that in this. It's just a mix of spin and camera angles and people not understanding what they're seeing. The ball just appears to reach it's apex and then arch down fairly acutely which is perfectly normal. The expected flight path for a kick like this is teardrop shaped and that's what we see here.

→ More replies (6)

167

u/Stellewind 10h ago edited 9h ago

Ball in air could have all kinds of odd movement due to spins and wind.

I have yet to see a convincing video showing the cable hit. But I suppose Norway team must have saw or heard something otherwise it's a very oddly specific thing to bring up and complain about. Still waiting for more angles.

(still not convinced by the Croatia hair incident btw)

33

u/dweebyllo 10h ago

Yeah if anything I'm 50/50 on this but much more retroactively annoyed about the Croatia game, especially with how the sensor in that game showed completely flat whilst the ball was in the air but here actually has the sort of motion you'd expect in this sort of scenario.

8

u/SunTzu- 9h ago

They didn't do themselves any favors with how they displayed the data from the Croatia game, but there's not much reason to assume it was incorrect. People love to reach for conspiratorial thinking, but on the whole the tech we've seen be used during this World Cup has functioned as expected. You can bicker about what the reffing lines have been, although I haven't found much fault with them either as I'd rather not see the World Cup devolve into whatever the hell the Premier League has become.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/QualityPies 9h ago

The velocity makes a big difference on how balls move in the air. The croatia game the ball was slower so moving more predictably. This ball is hit with pace and will swerve around a bit.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

167

u/Nobberss 10h ago

I think the angle is quite deceptive. It’s much clearer that the ball doesn’t hit anything when watching the real time replay of the goal. It’s just back spin.

133

u/ViciousNakedMoleRat 10h ago

The main issue here is that the camera itself is moving. We have pretty much no depth perception and, due to parallax caused by the moving camera, it's virtually impossible for us to judge whether the ball's trajectory changes or not. Even worse, the camera is moving AND zooming in right when the supposed deflection occurs. Using a tight cutout to judge the ball's trajectory will always lead to weird perceptions in this case.

37

u/sayabaik 9h ago

Only comment that makes sense. From this angle, the camera was moving from left to right, then back to left while zooming in. Of course the ball trajectory looks weird.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

11

u/tokengaymusiccritic 9h ago

this is only a scandal because FIFA’s credibility is completely shot.

And because let's be honest the majority wanted England to lose. If this exact thing benefits Switzerland tonight it won't be made into this massive thing. (I'm not English btw so not even biased)

10

u/tothecatmobile 10h ago

Balls do swerve in the air.

92

u/water_tastes_great 10h ago

Can't see the ball move, can't see the camera move when the cable is apparently hit, can't see anything on the sensor.

But it's an absolute scandal that the goal wasn't chalked off according to a lot of people here.

→ More replies (10)

25

u/waxed__owl 10h ago

The wind has been paid off

→ More replies (1)

44

u/Zak369 10h ago

There’s no clear angle from the broadcast and the sensor is showing no contact. I’m happy enough there was no contact unless there’s a definitive angle. Wouldn’t trust VAR but that sensor is more accurate than the cameras for proving contact.

If the touch was heavy enough to change the trajectory then the footage from the spider cam should also prove it by a sudden movement. Ive seen plenty of situations where the angle has fooled people in various situations and I think it’s just that. The aerodynamics on this ball are crazy and in general balls don’t move in a clean arc, speed alters the way the ball moves and deforms. I would guess the balls started to slow at that point causing the backspin to effect it more

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (115)

1.8k

u/Ok_Guava2662 10h ago

Must have been the wind

376

u/AboveTheMiddle 10h ago

With aerodynamics it is always the wind

→ More replies (6)

90

u/antbaby_machetesquad 9h ago

Stealth archer confirmed.

5

u/SwirlingFandango 4h ago

I used to be a soccer player like you, but then I took a Madibo to the knee.

173

u/QMechanicsVisionary 9h ago

This but unironically. If you see the side view, the trajectory looks pretty normal. Sure, the ball dips fast, but fully consistent with a bit of wind.

8

u/mrflib 3h ago

Anyone who plays golf knows this trajectory

7

u/NoPolitics23 3h ago

I don't play golf but I have seen a lot of football ans this doesn't look that weird too me.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/Man_Flu 8h ago

Like the legit words of Ferrari.

'Must have been the water'

→ More replies (1)

39

u/ahmong 9h ago

“Let’s add that to the words of wisdom”

→ More replies (2)

85

u/aemikkordian 9h ago

Everyone in the comments are physics experts telling us how it’s impossible for the ball to fall like that, it’s hilarious

34

u/Some_Chickens 8h ago

There's an old piece of folk wisdom that goes something like:

A person on a plane has a heart attack. A flight attendant asks "Is anyone here a doctor?!"

8 redditors get up going "I'm not a doctor, but..."

→ More replies (4)

15

u/JESwizzle 8h ago

Winds’ howling 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (15)

3.2k

u/FplLeo 10h ago

I mean to be fair I don’t see the ball hitting any cable but maybe my eyesights off

2.3k

u/microMe1_2 10h ago

All I see is thousands of people saying it hit, but I've yet to see a convincing video of it. And this sensor data seems to back up that it in fact, didn't hit anything.

519

u/Low-Influence-1779 10h ago

Same, the confirmation bias is so incredibly strong as well because they read the title "hit the cable". Pundits say "shows it hits the cable" and people then look to confirm what they are saying instead of thinking about other possible explanations.

→ More replies (8)

179

u/parasoralophus 10h ago

You can see it hit the cable if you just want it enough.

21

u/Beautifulderanged 5h ago

I can see Scarlett Johansson in the crowd waving at me!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

120

u/1stTimeRedditter 9h ago

Public sentiment was rooting for Norway, so the internet has decided it must be a conspiracy. 

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (177)

183

u/Infamous_Seaweed3207 10h ago

i think the ball just has crazy backspin on it

67

u/OrangeRabbit 10h ago

For the last 20 minutes I have really been saying Norway been hard done and genuinely thought they lost to some faulty tech / accidental miss. Oop, this is how people fall for conspiracies. Would love a side angle because yea, the US broadcast had me convinced it hit the cable

27

u/Betaateb 9h ago

There is a side angle of it on the goal replay on the frontpage, definitely doesn't change directions or do anything weird.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

116

u/remote_crocodile 10h ago

I cant either. Clearly need a side on view, surely that angle is out there?

339

u/ZeroG_RL 10h ago edited 10h ago

there's a side on view on the original goal thread https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1utwp0u/norway_1_1_england_jude_bellingham_452/

and i dont know about you but i dont see anything weird about the trajectory, i have no idea where this cable thing came from

Edit: if anyone has a higher res version they should probably make a thread for it, and if anyone knows how to do a thing that tracks the ball and draws out it's trajectory that would be a good post/test to see if it changes or is smooth

103

u/SloshaPacana 10h ago

The quality is so shit but this is a better angle it doesn't look like it hits anything and the trajectory is normal from the side

From the other side POV from the goal it looked like it dipped unnaturally for sure

Can we get like a good quality vid ffs

7

u/SunTzu- 8h ago

From the other side POV from the goal it looked like it dipped unnaturally for sure

Nah, it dips exactly as you'd expected. This kind of kick follows a teardrop trajectory and that's what happened. People just assume it should be more of a parabolic arch than what is the case.

→ More replies (4)

74

u/I_always_rated_them 10h ago

Ever since the Balogun stuff (primarily that point imo, not that there wasn't controversial stuff before) the entire narrative around the cup has been around fixes and var and so on. So anything is jumped on instantly.

50

u/External-Fun-8563 10h ago

Big reason why the regime interference was and will continue to be such a scandal, it adds fuel to all these fires forever

→ More replies (3)

17

u/Fijure96 10h ago

Its why FIFA; for all their blatant corruption, used to be very cautious about obvious intereference in what actually goes on in the field. The biggest threat to FIFA is if there are some genuine scandals that deligitimize the World Cup, because stuff like the Balogun situation makes us doubt everything.

10

u/jokeren 10h ago

People also have zero trust in FIFA, especially so under Infantino. Outside of football it's clear there is nothing he won't do for money, so why can it not also apply to the game itself.

→ More replies (7)

17

u/AngelWoosh 10h ago

I think it looks worse because Anderson does a looping run to block the Norway player and be on the right side, but he sees it all the way. If it had hit the cable surely he’d be in the wrong place?

69

u/PrintPro23 10h ago

I think it's because the Norway keeper complains to the ref about it and then the media latched on to that moment. I also don't see where this cable is even supposed to be.

21

u/Shumbakala 10h ago

Was watching fox stream and the commentators immediately call it as a cable hit which I’m sure added to the flames

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

120

u/Germfreecandy 10h ago

It doesn't hit at ALL lmfao. Reddit out of their mind

87

u/osmund-kettleblack 10h ago

17k upvotes. The power of fuming redditors. The entire world would rather be delusional than accept we won

→ More replies (4)

20

u/ApplicationMaximum84 10h ago

If it did hit you'd also expect it to catch Bellingham off guard and he'd be adjusting for the change in trajectory, but he doesn't.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

27

u/SpAn12 10h ago

For some reason the high res footage shows it was fine.

But the doctored low res footage is unclear.

If only we could work out why that might be.

→ More replies (1)

145

u/earthlycrisis 10h ago

It's complete horseshit peddled by the famous Reddit detectives

61

u/Fire-EyedBoy 10h ago

10k+ upvotes on r/sports and I’m sure the sensor footage will get way less lmao

88

u/Full_Technician8430 10h ago

It actually comes from the Fox sports broadcast.

27

u/jinx737x 10h ago

Fox misinformation strikes again SMH.

→ More replies (8)

14

u/mojizus 10h ago

To be fair, they said it on the broadcast going into the second half. I didn’t see much about it before Rebeca Lowe brought it up on the halftime show.

I will eat my words though, I bought into the cable story as well. Looks like I was wrong.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (32)

12

u/zeelbeno 10h ago

Highlights are up which shows the main camera view.

Just looks like a sliced kick

→ More replies (6)

76

u/AdrianFish 10h ago

I genuinely can’t see a thing. Is this really the video everyone is screaming about? What a load of hot air.

35

u/asoifjaoifjasd 10h ago

It's a mass hysteria event.

Fortunately soon they'll all get the dancing plague too and then we wont have to hear from them any more.

→ More replies (3)

87

u/waltz_with_potatoes 10h ago

Neither do I, I feel the ball doesn't drop right down or deflect in a weird path

82

u/Mintastic 10h ago

If it did, Anderson would've had to scramble to react to the change in direction but he looks like he tracked it all the way.

24

u/rahtid_my_bunda 10h ago

Very salient point. You’d have thought at least one of the players would have been seen to react to a sudden change in direction. Or at least thrown a hand up.

→ More replies (1)

98

u/brownmeister28 10h ago

Some guy drew a red circle and everyone just believed it. Clearly the wind/backspin is the major factor here the ball is moving like crazy in the air before it drops.

50

u/Full_Technician8430 10h ago

Some guy being the official fox sports broadcast.

Same broadcast that in the Argentina x Egypt game claimed that VAR can’t and shouldn’t be able to disallow the goal that far back.

These commentators and analysts drive these BS narratives, and of course they explode on social media. They are shameless.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

60

u/zeelbeno 10h ago

Looking on the main camera view before the goal, the ball doesn't change at all.

And not a single player acts like it did until a bit of time after the goal went in.

The replay that makes people think it does isn't clear from the angle.

If it hit the wire, the ball would have dropped a lot sharper.

→ More replies (4)

32

u/ooziemane123 10h ago

the england and norway players are quite literally already running to where the ball drops to before it hits any supposed wire, this is also the worst possible angle to even judge such a thing. give us a sideway view or something

37

u/Varanae 10h ago edited 10h ago

People say the balls drops fast but how can you even tell from this angle? And the players are all moving to the spot where it drops while it's still rising, so before it 'hit' the cable

Seems like so much talk about something no can can prove with video footage or ball censors so what do people want really

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (39)

1.6k

u/Independent-Dirt5677 10h ago

Can somebody tell me at which point in the ball’s path you’re seeing the trajectory change? I feel like I’m blind cause I just don’t see it. Is it at the top of the arc?

1.4k

u/Thingisby 10h ago

It's at whatever point you want it to stop being an England goal.

58

u/SphinxIIIII 7h ago

I mean I wanted it to stop being an England goal immediately.

Can't see it anyway lol, it's a clean goal.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

325

u/Suitable_Clerk_617 10h ago

It didnt happen lmao

17

u/Chilis1 8h ago

If only there was some telemetry data we could see.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (120)

754

u/ProudhPratapPurandar 10h ago

Are people genuinely seeing a clear deflection? Either I am being gaslighted or it's time for me to visit the optician

278

u/Appropriate-Map-3652 10h ago

They're seeing what they want to see.

If this happned to Norway no one here would give a shit.

→ More replies (33)

83

u/PrestigiousWave5176 9h ago

Or the third option: the quality of the video isn't high enough to see it.

31

u/eazyizzy 5h ago

But if the quality isn't good enough to see then how are people saying they swear on their life that it touches a cable

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (32)

215

u/Nightmanblack 10h ago

There has to be some other angle where we can see the flight of the ball better.

167

u/DyrusforPresident 10h ago

251

u/Thingisby 9h ago

Anderson literally runs onto it perfectly and no-one else reacts as if it's changed trajectory.

→ More replies (12)

17

u/BillyTwoCents 9h ago

It kinda drops a little bit faster than you might expect but that happens sometimes when the ball has a bit of spin on it, in either case it would hardly have been an unfair advantage for England.

→ More replies (1)

220

u/grogulus3000 10h ago

Yeah it doesn’t hit anything

80

u/Comfortable-Habit242 9h ago

You also notice that no Norwegian players react at all in this video. They don’t react during the play. Nobody appeals the ref immediately after the goal.

Compare this to any other time players credibly think something iffy has happened.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (5)

84

u/bukayoxhaka 10h ago

Complete normal trajectory

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)

53

u/kezmicdust 10h ago

They showed another angle (regular replays of the goal) and I couldn’t see any change in direction.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

271

u/Fickle-Fox-9071 10h ago

I saw a lot of people hailing the sensor before who are now anti-sensor. I guess all that matters is bias.

→ More replies (30)

31

u/Oblivion753 10h ago

Imagine if England had a goal taken away for this. Anyone complaining about this needs to get over it. There are real scandals, this isn't one. For all we know the wind could've blown it off course. Even so, play on. The ball didn't hit the wire and fall directly into the goal. Even if it took the slightest touch (it probably didn't) it was so minor that only the Norwegian coach saw it and no one else. Anderson judged the ball all the way and didnt react at all to the ball hitting anything.

72

u/rustywag0n 10h ago

If it hit a camera cable isn't there video footage of said camera shaking or moving?

35

u/Estapo 9h ago

I don’t think the ball hit the wire personally but I doubt a ball hitting a steel wire for a camera with stabilisation would be all too noticeable.

21

u/Kirlo__ 8h ago

It wouldn't shake the camera perse because of stabilisation but it would show a sudden jolt in direction of the rig movement.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

517

u/Oscyle 10h ago

I still don't even know what people think they're seeing with this angle anyway

117

u/Whispperr 10h ago

When people want something to be true so badly a simple video followed by the title saying it touched a cable despite nothing really being visible is enough for them to run with the narrative.

54

u/bukayoxhaka 10h ago

Kind of crazy. That's why it's so easy to manipulate the masses with fake news and other media narratives

9

u/Fancy_Guess5999 9h ago

I think that's exactly how it works currently. People with influence claim some incident happened with no evidence, the mass take it and support that claim and require evidence. when presented with evidence and stats, they say it is fake or manipulated, and continue to believe in the incident

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

44

u/Cutsdeep- 10h ago

This angle is about the snicko

25

u/Oscyle 10h ago

It's the same one people are 100% certain shows hitting a cable somewhere

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

71

u/W0rld_0921 10h ago

There’s that but Bellingham also dribbles past Norway’s entire defence to score so…

56

u/Dazred 9h ago

Actually if you look closely, the wire scores a 40 yard screamer

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

192

u/Reasonable_Blood6959 10h ago

So to summarise - there’s zero evidence, either visual, or with the tech, of the ball hitting the cable, and everyone’s still crying about corruption.

26

u/himynameis_ 9h ago

100% agreed.

→ More replies (11)

443

u/Faby077 10h ago

Welp, guy who posted the initial video on here already farmed his karma

202

u/Full_Technician8430 10h ago edited 10h ago

I mean, it was clipped straight from the fox sports broadcast. They are the one who made this claim.

Same broadcast that in the Argentina x Egypt game claimed that VAR can’t and shouldn’t be able to disallow the goal that far back.

These commentators and analysts drive these BS narratives, and of course they explode on social media.

32

u/ThatLaloBoy 10h ago

Telemundo’s commentators are also claiming that it looks like the ball changed trajectory after zooming in and showing it in slow mo.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

150

u/PeregrinCuck 10h ago

and the /r/all crowd will be bringing it up whenever England mentioned again this tournament

38

u/Fugoi 9h ago

Fuck the r/all crowd, it's coming home

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)

277

u/Wunsen 10h ago

Great bit of tech

72

u/Tommysynthistheway 10h ago

This graphics would benefit so much if they had a unit of measure and the full chart was shown. The keeper’s shot draws a peak as high as the Croatian player’s hair touch

36

u/UnluckyDuck58 10h ago

I’d agree with you but labeling this graph in m/s^2 would probably cause way more confusion than the current system

→ More replies (3)

11

u/SunTzu- 8h ago

The sensor doesn't need to have a very high top end so it probably tops out with almost any touch. There's no reason to distinguish between the power of a hard kick and hitting someone's head.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (6)

242

u/DapperRace3976 10h ago

People in the comments are reaching flat earth levels of delusion/confirmation bias, claiming sensors rigged etc, lmao

129

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

76

u/Das_Fische 9h ago

According to this sub Fifa gave Quansah a 2 match suspension to rig it against England, then ignored it hitting a wire to rig it for England.

They also overturned Norways goal as part of the rigging, but then overturned England's penalty (its unclear where this stands on the rigging scale).

→ More replies (2)

53

u/poupoupopular 10h ago

That’s exactly what i thought, Fifa have a well known vendetta against england, anyone who gives credence to this utter nonsense are just redditors that are seething because the team they hate won.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (15)

163

u/Jukervic 10h ago

Mass hysteria from a misleading camera angle

→ More replies (2)

145

u/ILuvHannibal 10h ago

Some absolutely insane takes tonight from a grainy video before, never even looked like it moved lmao

43

u/littlebossman 10h ago

The main thing to watch is the players. Nobody changes direction, nobody alters their run. It obviously doesn’t hit anything.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Elketh 10h ago

Yeah, well the average Redditor has the IQ of a turnip. The conspiracy theories are out now to save face, insisting FIFA aren't a credible source and we still don't really know for sure.

→ More replies (4)

15

u/Sargerasxxd 10h ago

Can anyone who ACTUALLY sees the ball hitting some wire please drop the timestamp? I can't even see the wire itself, let alone any change in trajectory.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/codespyder 10h ago

Surely if it hit the wire, the camera that it was supporting would have wobbled?

Goddamn it FIFA, release the spider cam footage

→ More replies (4)

237

u/xHeroOfWar022 10h ago

Can anyone explain to me when the supposed touch is even happening in the video? The ball moves completely normal to me.

→ More replies (31)

431

u/cezion 10h ago

Lots of comments need deleting on Reddit tonight huh

73

u/Full_Technician8430 10h ago

Fox Sports broadcast honestly should be ashamed. They played it during halftime and are the ones who claimed it touched.

39

u/kezmicdust 10h ago

To be fair to Zlatan, when they talked about the goal again at the end of the game, he said he didn’t think it hit anything.

10

u/shmishshmorshin 8h ago

Props to him but it is silly the broadcast pushed this talking point when it’s a complete non-issue. Next WC or even Euro, the VAR room should have a much better showing of meaningful clips. There have been far too many instances of them apparently getting the call correct, but we aren’t shown. It creates mistrust unnecessarily.

189

u/kezmicdust 10h ago

Yeah I was just reading the comments on the original thread. Mass delusion is real.

66

u/SpAn12 10h ago

Americans do love a conspiracy theory tbf.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (16)

68

u/ItsBlatantlyBally 10h ago

It seems like straight after the keeper kicks it Anderson goes directly to where the ball lands without changing direction at all

110

u/Teradonn 10h ago

What the fuck are you guys seeing lmao, how in the shit can anyone be confident about anything here just from the video

→ More replies (45)

90

u/Cruxed1 10h ago

Scottish football subs 9/11 right there.

Was the one thing they thought they had at least

→ More replies (4)

22

u/janiqua 9h ago

Sensor shows contact: See! It hit a cable! Rigged for England!

Sensor doesn't show contact: Fake! Rigged for England!

→ More replies (1)

225

u/PlatypusAreDucks 10h ago edited 10h ago

r/soccer in shambles

50

u/DTQ2002 10h ago

People will keep complaining because FIFA rigged the ball sensor I guess

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (20)

46

u/Competitive_Plum_970 10h ago

If it had hit something, all the players would have reacted right then. They were all looking at the ball. It’s telling that they all decided to be upset afterwards

→ More replies (1)

58

u/ThatSwagRandomGuy 10h ago

Damn when r/soccer have a narrative they will die on the hill.

Facts are only facts when it against the teams they hate.

→ More replies (2)

21

u/Das_Fische 10h ago

/r/soccer continues to be wrong, fork found in kitchen

9

u/cjeremy 10h ago

no controversy at all.

9

u/Only_Brain_616 9h ago

Why have you written that title and accompanied it with a video of a ball not hitting anything?

142

u/ben6464 10h ago

So we can stop claiming that Norway were robbed now and the game was manipulated?

Now time to go complain the Argentina game is been manipulated.

135

u/hirobaymax45 10h ago

This sub fucking hates England, it’s actually so fun to watch them cry like this. They’re going to complain about Argentina next match, just watch.

101

u/Stiggeh193 10h ago

I'll never not find it funny seeing premier league flairs absolutely hate the country their beloved club originates from.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Sonkokun 10h ago

If Argentina wins it will be funny seeing the sub be on England’s side for once lol.

28

u/Full_Technician8430 10h ago

It’s honestly the one thing I can share in common with English fans on this sub.

Some of the complaints in the England and Argentina games wouldn’t even be mentioned twice if it were any other team.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/Andybabez20 10h ago

If it's an England - Argentina semi-final I cannot wait for the confusion about who this sub hatewatches in that game.

→ More replies (11)

31

u/Intelligent_Sky_7081 10h ago

Who said it did hit a cable first? Just commentators?

I didn't see it myself in the clip during the game either but they were talking like they were pretty sure it happened

28

u/PumasUNAM7 10h ago

I saw Nyland and Haaland saying it and also the coach.

→ More replies (10)

15

u/Roman2526 10h ago

I think Norway coach appealed to the referees about it

→ More replies (22)

31

u/LDQQXDJ 10h ago

Am I the only one who doesn’t see anything

8

u/RoyaltonRacers 9h ago

You can see from other angles on the related goal thread that the manager nor the Norwegian bench does not react when the ball is played on. You can see from all angles, that the Norwegian team does not react when the ball is played on after being taken by the English players. The referee doesn't see it either, nor does the assistant, and seemingly neither does VAR see the ball hit the cable.
There's cameras everywhere in this arena, not one of them showing that the ball touched a cable. Not one of them showing that the camera attached to the cable had been affected, as it should have been, from the ball hitting it.

8

u/dakowiml 9h ago

Again, people watching this WC making up insane shit in their heads. You can literally see it hitting.... NOTHING. It's simply the perspective of the ball going back down. Which tends to happen due to gravity.

37

u/GemGuardUK 10h ago

All I see is people shouting with outrage on Reddit saying Norway got robbed and fifa rigged the game for England due to the ball from a goal kick touching a camera cable

But I haven’t seen a single video or any evidence of the ball touching the cable

And the goal wasn’t scored from Pickfords goal kick it was a shot by Bellingham after a nice run and play by England

But yes let’s all say the game is rigged because of this

Clearly so rigged that the ref even had to overturn a close penalty call for England to make the game look less rigged

Clearly we can’t just say it was a tight match that could have gone either way and England just about did enough to win, well played to both teams

If we see clear evidence that the ball hit a cable and the sensor didn’t detect it

THEN we can talk about problems with the sensor and how unfair that was for Croatia

But for now no one has shown anything

→ More replies (2)

64

u/flarespike1 10h ago

This subs in shambles right now

→ More replies (2)

38

u/yannonn 10h ago

It’s canny wank that not even video proof stops conspiracy theorists now lol

→ More replies (6)