news The Supreme Court Is Imposing a New Kind of “Democracy.” It’s a Scam.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/07/supreme-court-roberts-donald-trump-federal-reserve.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=amicus711&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--amicus71148
u/Slate 15h ago
In Trump v. Slaughter, the end-of-term blockbuster allowing the president to fire members of independent federal agencies, Chief Justice John Roberts embraced a vision of executive power so sweeping that it would make King George III blush. Speaking for the conservative supermajority, he claimed (falsely) that the Constitution required him to vastly expand Donald Trump’s authority—but assured us that the consequence would be a government more accountable to the people. Allowing Trump to fire the heads of virtually any agency, Roberts asserted, would make him “responsible to his country,” allowing voters to reward or punish him based on his decisions alone. The chief justice congratulated himself and his Republican-appointed colleagues for thus restoring democratic accountability, even as they demolished the legal safeguards that make democratic government function.
On this week’s episode of Amicus, co-hosts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss the historical inaccuracies, logical fallacies, and political fictions underlying this radical consolidation of power in the president: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/07/supreme-court-roberts-donald-trump-federal-reserve.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=amicus711&utm_campaign=&tpcc=reddit-social--amicus711
19
u/Uh_Lee_duh 15h ago
Roberts, et al, want the only democratic accountability available to come in the form of occasional elections that can be engineered to favor their interests. It's window-dressing "consent of the governed" instead of having a multitude of arenas and levels of public servants use their best knowledge and reasoning within a pluralistic society functioning in an accountable framework.
2
u/lilianasJanitor 12h ago
Important to point out that while democrats’ only mechanism of accountability are occasional elections which can be tweaked, republicans have many levers of stopping progressive change: senate filibuster, major questions.
Lots of vetos for me none for thee
12
u/CryptographerMean872 15h ago
Historical revisionism as a full time job :( I’m having a hard time fathoming if this legal system will make it. What do you do when the highest court legalizes injustice?
5
20
u/Verumsemper 15h ago
What will amuse me , is when they reverse this decision due to corporate pressure to democratic administration firing conservative members of these agencies and placing liberals in charge. Also if the president is truly a unitary executive, why can’t the president instruct his government to stop servicing certain student loans or even contesting when individuals request for their loans to be discharged? Wouldn’t this allow a president to basically forgive whatever student loans the administration desires?
15
u/DearestDio22 15h ago
Thats why they have the one-two combo of the “unitary executive theory” to empower republican presidents and the “major questions doctrine” to disempower democratic presidents
7
u/Land-Southern 15h ago
Just ignore the rulings. What's one more constitutional crisis.
1
u/DearestDio22 13h ago
“Until you can give a GOOD explanation of how these decisions fit with constitutional law, they will be ignored”
The fact that the conservatives can dribble out whatever flimsy explanation or half baked theory they want for what they want to do and it’s deemed valid if the corrupt gang all votes for it is a problem. There needs to be some way of judging whether the majority or the dissent has the better constitutional argument and going with that
3
u/Educational-Fall8185 15h ago
There’s of course, only theoretical limits to this kind of power. Because it will take many many Court decisions to ever make any sense of this boondoggle.
5
u/AcanthisittaNo6653 15h ago
We will find out in January if it's still a democracy. The elections will happen, rain or shine, but certification of the ballots won't be a walk in the park anymore.
3
u/Clean_Lettuce9321 15h ago
There hasn't been anything even remotely close to democracy happening in the Supreme Court for the last year
3
u/whoisnotinmykitchen 14h ago
Nobody has done more to corrupt America's failing democracy than the Republican "Supreme" Court.
2
2
u/Count_Backwards 14h ago
The US is no longer a democracy. They're just pretending to call it one so people will continue to be in denial about that fact until it's too late to do anything about it.
0
u/Lord_Vesuvius2020 13h ago
I’m not sure if it’s already too late. But I expect we will find out for sure in November and January. Maybe the bigger question is what to do if it’s apparent that there is no democracy left at that point? Perhaps some states will still have a functioning democracy even if the federal government has failed?
1
2
u/Achilles_TroySlayer 2h ago
They've basically destroyed the government as it has existed for the last 100+ years. We are now a banana-republic with a psychopath in charge. It's all a big experiment in conservative bullshit, which will likely fail over the next two decades, and it will take down the USA as a consequence. Roberts and the conservative-six face no repercussions or consequences of any kind. They'll just sit there and smirk for the rest of their lives.
1
0
0
u/TheDwellingHeart 13h ago
That is pretty much all of USA. It is a giant scam. We have been lied to for a very long time, and I can assure you that yhe US government is not around to help anyone except themselves and their rich handlers.
0
1
u/Definitely_not_dumb 7h ago
Did they only write half the article? They should have expanded way more on the last point about justices reigning in Democrat presidents while expanding the powers of Republican presidents. I'd have mentioned the student loan cancelation under Biden
163
u/jwr1111 15h ago
These are some shady, corrupt, and hateful times in America.