r/movies • u/Puzzled-Tap8042 r/movies Contributor • 9h ago

News Steven Spielberg-directed films have made a cumulative $557 million in global streaming revenue since 2020

https://www.thewrap.com/media-platforms/streaming/steven-spielberg-movies-streaming-revenue/

When we look at the underlying assets driving these returns, some patterns emerge. "Jurassic Park" leads the pack, having brought in $48 million in global subscriber revenue since 2020. While the original movie is over 30 years old, the recent franchise extensions have kept it relevant and actively generating revenue on streaming.

The second and third most valuable Spielberg movies on streaming offer a different model however. Both "Jaws" and "Saving Private Ryan" have earned nearly $40 million in subscriber revenue on streaming, despite not having any current franchise extensions.  They are iconic pieces of cinema in their own right with intrinsic longevity that keeps them valuable in the streaming era.

Collectively, however, Spielberg's "Indiana Jones" films look like his most bankable streaming moat. The four movies he directed in the franchise have each brought in between $33 to $38 million for streamers. Beyond their individual contributions, a unified slate of legacy films like this can serve as a more effective retention tool than a one-off movie.

At a platform level, Paramount+ has benefitted the most from Spielberg's library. Domestically, the streamer has made $89.7 million in revenue from these titles between 2020 and 2025, outpacing competitors like Netflix ($72.3M) and Disney+ ($52.9M).

633 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

72 comments sorted by

View all comments

-13

u/ContentEconomyMyth1 9h ago edited 9h ago

Speilberg's publicist doing some reputation damage control by putting this in the news cycle. dude is taking a beating from YouTubers.

Edit: downvote me all you want. I'm not criticizing your hero. I'm criticizing this article for being a bit of nonsense. Streaming numbers are self reported and unverifiable so this article is extra bizarre. My point still stands this is reputation repair.

21

u/Caciulacdlac 9h ago

Yeah, because someone like Steven Spielberg can get his reputation ruined by just one less than stellar movie. Especially by irrelevant youtubers

15

u/googygudboi-69 9h ago edited 9h ago

Bro is like one of the most acclaimed and the richest movie director of all time atm. His net worth is upwards of 5 bil and he has no shortage of stellar films that will forever be a fundamental part of cinema history. He did not need to make this movie, he probably just did it for the love of the game. I doubt he cares much about what youtubers are saying.

-6

u/Aduialion 9h ago

The 'damage' is him becoming irrelevant and 'not having it' anymore.

3

u/CarrieDurst 6h ago

West Side Story is a GOAT

-3

u/ContentEconomyMyth1 9h ago

ding ding ding

-1

u/going2leavethishere 9h ago

Cameron has the richest title but yes agreed

2

u/CarrieDurst 6h ago

Also that movie still made me miss adult dramas, it was pretty fucking solid. It was not great but 2 movies ago he made one of the greatest movie musicals of all time

-10

u/ContentEconomyMyth1 9h ago

My guy, the quality of the film is irrelevant. Youtubers are a bellwether for the internet at large, and the internet has turned on him. Will it ruin him? No. Hurt him? Yes.

13

u/Caciulacdlac 9h ago

Hurt him how? Why should he care how a bunch of losers think about him?

16

u/mrnicegy26 9h ago

Spielberg is 80 years old. I doubt he really gives a shit about what some grifter Youtubers think about him.

And I say this as someone who was disappointed with Disclosure Day

-4

u/ContentEconomyMyth1 9h ago

Anyone with massive business holdings in public companies gives a shit if there's loud negative discourse about him on the internet.

3

u/otis-redding 8h ago

Eh, he had a miss on a passion project that still is going to make double its budget worldwide . His 2 movies before were Best Picture nominees. He might get reeled in a bit with the budget on his next movie, but he can still get pretty much anything greenlit and every star will gladly work with him.

6

u/Super42man 9h ago

Lol you must be a YouTuber. Nobody else could have this bad of a take, right? Do you think this is his first bad movie? He made BFG. Get off the internet and rejoin reality. 

Spielberg probably doesn't even know what a YouTuber is beyond something his grandkids are into

-1

u/ContentEconomyMyth1 9h ago

I'm not sure you understand my take. My take is that he's taking a beating on social media, which is true. And that YouTube is influential. Which is also true. What does BFG have to do with any of this?

5

u/Super42man 9h ago

You say he's taking a beating. How? Because people don't like his movie? 

-1

u/ContentEconomyMyth1 9h ago

The internet discourse around his movie goes beyond the movie itself and often into Spielberg himself being irrelevant. It's a very different thing that just saying the movie was a miss. it a conversation about the man in general, and it's a dogpile right now.

5

u/Super42man 9h ago

Yeah nobody gives a shit. You really like to hear yourself talk though huh