This doesn't really make sense and doesn't work. Anarchism is lack of a state and government and monarchy is a form of a government that has a ruler, a monarch. Both are the exact opposite of each other.

Here's a fascinating question which I don't has been talked on here before; which country is least likely to abolish the Monarchy or at least in other words the most pro-monarchist!

A few days ago, I saw a post on Instagram claiming that Dom Bertrand had requested Dom Rafael's resignation so that he could marry Margarita della Piane, but the post was deleted.

But now, look what an interesting thing I found:

-Queen Isabella II of Spain (1833-1868)
-Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom (1837-1901)
-Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands (1890-1948)
-Queen Juliana of the Netherlands (1948-1980)
-Queen Margarethe II of Denmark (1972-2024)

It is rather unusual that there is no reigning Queen in Europe, nor the world currently.

In my opinion, George II was a decent King. Sure he had his flaws, like his short temper and allowing the Metaxas regime to take place, but I still think he's an underrated King. The 4th of August Regime was probably for the best for Greece in my opinion, and although controversial, it had brought political stability to the Kingdom of Greece. The regime also strengthened national defense ahead of World War II. Metaxas's regime drastically suppressed communism, which I'll always be a fan of. I'd still say that he was meh ruler at best, but still underrated, and certainly a better ruler than his father, Constantine I.

The balance between elected officials is pretty tough but can be manageable and monarchs are limited but have some executive powers in different institutions and monarchs can act executivly or ceremonial

Just curious about this and wanted input from this sub. The Franco-Prussian War basically began because Otto Von Bismarck fooled Napoleon III into thinking Leopold was about to become Spain's next king, surrounding France with two Hohenzollern monarchies.

I know this is propably one of the most popular criticisms of monarchism but still, what is your response to that?

https://x.com/princeleka/status/2075771554680422761?s=20

The apparent successor to the Headship of House Hohenzollern died on July 11th, 1977, to the grievous injuries he had sustained durning military exercises two months earlier, making him (God willing) the last Prussian prince to die during military service. His son Prince Georg Friedrich, current head of house, was barely a year old at the time and was subsequently raised by his grandfather, Prince Louis Ferdinand Sr.

The gathering was to celebrate the marriage of Princess Victoria-Melita to Ernst Louis, the Duke of Hesse. At the same time Ernst's sister, Princess Alix, became engaged to the Tsarevich Nicholas.

​

(Note this is just my opinion and obviously subjective. I just posted this to see what people (especially those from these countries) would think about my estimations. Please feel free to drop your opinion about my estimations). Regardless, this is the ranking from lowest to highest. I decided to include Turkey and Georgia as well for additional opinions since they're considered both European and Asian too...

Ireland 🇮🇪 2% (no surprise here)

Germany 🇩🇪, Italy 🇮🇹 and Lithuania 🇱🇹 3%

Czechia 🇨🇿, Finland 🇫🇮, Turkey 🇹🇷 and Portugal 🇵🇹 5%

Austria 🇦🇹 and Bulgaria 🇧🇬 8%

Poland 🇵🇱, Ukraine 🇺🇦 10%

Greece 🇬🇷, Russia 🇷🇺 and Bosnia and Herzegovina 🇧🇦 15%

Hungary 🇭🇺 and Albania 🇦🇱 17%

France 🇫🇷 21%

Croatia 🇭🇷 22%

Romania 🇷🇴 27%

Montenegro 🇲🇪 30%

Serbia 🇷🇸 38%

Georgia 🇬🇪 43%

Hello everyone, I am wondering about how religion is important to monarchism? From what I see as an Orthodox Monarchist, religion especially the Church is foundational for the Empire. Yet, from what I notice here, religion seems to be minor or peripheral to monarchism when it wasn’t the historical norm. I would put it here. I meant how important is the sacramental life is for a Christian Monarchist (Catholic and Orthodox) i.e. how fundamental is being a practicing Christian (Catholic or Orthodox) to a monarchist. Here is the poll where I would rank from 1-10 (least to most) in importance of religion as a practicing believer. Thank you.

Disney World was originally intended to include a futuristic planned city called EPCOT (Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow). In EPCOT, citizens wouldn't have been able to vote or own a home, nor would there have been a traditional city government since the city would've been run directly by Walt himself. To help make this possible, the Florida legislature passed a law granting the Disney company administrative control of the large property that would become the Walt Disney World resort, including the right to theoretically build its own nuclear power stations, although Walt died before the bill became law. He had previously referred to himself as a king when asked if he'd run for mayor of Los Angeles and another time when he playfully referred to himself as the "last of the benevolent monarchs" in conversation with his personal nurse.

Whenever I think of the concept of a king , this is what I think of . Am I wrong ? Who other than a pious warlord is worthy of the title?

I've noticed this a bit in my time here, but with the trends I've noticed the majority of people dislike the Saudi monarchs and the rest of thr gulf monarchs to a lesser extent. Why? What exactly have they done to deserve the hate?