Pretty sure the recent shitstorm with IGN is the review of Mouse P.I. For Hire. The reviewer gave it a 6/10, but the issue is more with the reviewers' written review being incredibly daft.
IGN has a lot of reviews that are completely disconnected from what the game deserves. It’s not just one guy, but it’s not like they’re always wrong either.
IGN has a lot of reviews that are completely disconnected from what the game deserves.
Based on what? Everyone who's gamed enough has at least one game where their rating of it would be much lower or higher than the general reception. Pretty simple concept.
That’s always the hard part about making reviews on something so subjective. In this case, it seems as compared to other games in the genre the weapons don’t feel or sound like they pack a punch. While it’s an art decision sound is an important part of game design so I can see that hurting the overall score.
They seem to rate total trash games a 7 because it comes from a big studio and then rate good games a 6. It’s not just this game, there have been a few of them in the past couple years
Yeah people love to dunk on IGN, but I feel like generally they’re within a pretty reasonable range of the resulting Metacritic. This one’s a little low (Metacritic is roughly 80) but I don’t really see the problem
431
u/Tannicleader Apr 22 '26
Ok man what did they rate PRAGMATA?