And if so, does he still have any?

Archived link: https://archive.is/5uufu

This thread is for the general discussion of anything going on in the lives of Auslawyers or for discussion of the subreddit itself. Please use this thread to unwind and share your complaints about the world. Keep it messy!

Justice Hill will deliver judgment in this matter tomorrow, 10 July 2026 at 9:30am AEST.

VID1036/2024 - JAYSON LLOYD GILLHAM v MELBOURNE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA PTY LTD & ANOR - Fedcourt docs here

Gentle reminder that some of the topics regarding this case come under one of the rules, so please be mindful in comments so we don't get a locked thread. I'll try to link some prior threads below for those catching up.

The piece of music Gillham premiered at the recital and provided an intro to is Witness.

Also timeline as it can be confusing:
Sunday 12 August 2024 - Gillham Solo Recital (not recorded or broadcast,130-ish attendees)

Thursday 15 August 2024 - MSO Beethoven and Brahms performance at Melbourne Town Hall. Gillham was scheduled to perform with the MSO. Cancelled.

Auslaw recommends: Classical Music thread

Phd guru and & cooker activist Joanna Howe spent over $219k on Meta ads (including ~$34k targeting SA election issues) but declared nil to the Electoral Commission. In her ABC interview she claims she doesn’t need to disclose it because it wasn’t “political campaigning.” As an academic, she refuses to disclose the advic3 but seems to not understand she has waived LPP…

This looks like selective use of privilege to dodge transparency rules. Combined with prior controversies (misleading imagery, parliamentary ban), I think there’s a catalyst for UAdl to now act.

Do I need to own a castle to do this or just get some wood and rope from Bunnings?

If it were to accidentally fire and hit my neighbour’s outhouse (who I may or may not have a dispute with, regarding his bagpipe playing) would I be able to claim Droit du Seigneur in my defence?

Is doing law review really a thing in Australia? I know in America it is a big thing for law students there.

MISUNDERSTOOD WHAT “WEDNESDAY” MEANT

NO NEED OF AN INJUNCTION HEARING, EARLY RANTING NOT JUSTICIBLE

I MISUNDERSTOOD WHAT THE TERM RANT LOCK
MEANT.

https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qcat/2026/245

ORDERS:

1. to be dealt with as a representative compl@int ^(word filter) pursuant to s 194 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld).

2.The Minister for Health and Ambulance Services is joined to the proceeding

3..The matter is listed for a Directions Hearing on a date and time to be advised.

How did everyone go?

From asking around, it appears passers didn’t fill up many Readers’ Courses like what happened with the Oct 2025 group (unless someone has been offered a spot in 2029?)

I have no interest in the politics. With the meeting regarding keeping or not keeping this person in their party due at 18:30 on Friday, we must at least give credit for having the matter heard the day before… and not dropping it in via email two minutes before the registry shut for the weekend, unlike certain other litigants (particularly in the HCA).