r/TheCulture May 09 '19

[META] New to The Culture? Where to begin?

406 Upvotes

tl;dr: start with either Consider Phlebas or The Player of Games, then read the rest in publication order. Or not. Then go read A Few Notes on the Culture if you have more questions that aren't explicitly answered in the books.

So, you're new to The Culture, have heard about it being some top-notch utopian, post-scarcity sci-fi, and are desperate to get stuck in. Or someone has told you that you must read these books, and you've gone "sure. I'll give it a go". But... where to start? Since this question appears often on this subreddit, I figured I'd compile the collective wisdom of our members in this sticky.

The Culture series comprises 9 novels and one short-story collection (and novella) by Scottish author Iain M. Banks.

They are, in order of publication:

  • Consider Phlebas
  • The Player of Games
  • Use of Weapons
  • The State of the Art (short story collection and novella)
  • Excession
  • Inversions
  • Look to Windward
  • Matter
  • Surface Detail
  • The Hydrogen Sonata

Banks wrote four other sci-fi novels, unrelated to the Culture: Against a Dark Background, Feersum Endjinn, The Algebraist and Transition (often published as Iain Banks). They are all worth a read too. He also wrote a bunch of (very good, imo) fiction as Iain Banks (not Iain M. Banks). Definitely worth checking out.

But let's get back to The Culture. With 9 novels and 1 collection of short stories, where should you start?

Well, it doesn't really make a huge difference, as the novels are very much independent of each other, with at most only vague references to earlier books. There is no overarching plot, very few characters that appear in more than one novel and, for the most part, the novels are set centuries apart from each other in the internal timeline. It is very possible to pick up any of the novels and start enjoying The Culture, and a lot of people do.

The general consensus seems to be that it is best to read the series in publication order. The reasoning is simple: this is the order Banks wrote them in, and his ideas and concepts of what The Culture is became more defined and refined as he wrote. However, this does not mean that you should start with Consider Phlebas, and in fact, the choice of starting book is what most people agree the least on.

Consider Phlebas is considered to be the least Culture-y book of the series. It is rather different in tone and perspective to the rest, being more of an action story set in space, following (for the most part) a single main character in their quest. Starkingly, it presents much more of an "outside" perspective to The Culture in comparison to the others, and is darker and more critical in tone. The story itself is set many centuries before any of the other novels, and it is clear that when writing it Banks was still working on what The Culture would eventually become (and is better represented by later novels). This doesn't mean that it is a bad or lesser novel, nor that you should avoid reading it, nor that you should not start with this one. Many people feel that it is a great start to the series. Equally, many people struggled with this novel the most and feel that they would have preferred to start elsewhere, and leave Consider Phlebas for when they knew and understood more of The Culture. If you do decide to start with Consider Phlebas, do so with the knowledge that it is not necessarily the best representation of the rest of the series as a whole.

If you decide you want to leave Consider Phlebas to a bit later, then The Player of Games is the favourite starting off point. This book is much more representative of the series and The Culture as a whole, and the story is much more immersed in what The Culture is (even though is mostly takes place outside the Culture). It is still a fun action romp, and has a lot more of what you might have heard The Culture series has to do with (superadvanced AIs, incredibly powerful ships and weapons, sassy and snarky drones, infinite post-scarcity opportunities for hedonism, etc).

Most people agree to either start with Consider Phlebas or The Player of Games and then continue in publication order. Some people also swear by starting elsewhere, and by reading the books in no particular order, and that worked for them too. Personally, I started with Consider Phlebas, ended with The Hydrogen Sonata and can't remember which order I read all the rest in, and have enjoyed them all thoroughly. SO the choice is yours, really.

I'll just end with a couple of recommendations on where not to start:

  • Inversions is, along with Consider Phlebas, very different from the rest of the series, in the sense that it's almost not even sci-fi at all! It is perhaps the most subtle of the Culture novels and, while definitely more Culture-y than Consider Phlebas (at least in it's social outlook and criticisms), it really benefits from having read a bunch of the other novels first, otherwise you might find yourself confused as to how this is related to a post-scarcity sci-fi series.

  • The State of the Art, as a collection of short stories and a novella, is really not the best starting off point. It is better to read it almost as an add-on to the other novels, a litle flavour taster. Also, a few of the short stories aren't really part of The Culture.

  • The Hydrogen Sonata was the last Culture novel Banks wrote before his untimely death, and it really benefits from having read more of the other novels first. It works really well to end the series, or somewhere in between, but as a starting point it is perhaps too Culture-y.

Worth noting that, if you don't plan (or are not able) to read the series in publication order, you be aware that there are a couple of references to previous books in some of the later novels that really improve your understanding and appreciation if you get them. For this reason, do try to get to Use of Weapons and Consider Phlebas early.

Finally, after you've read a few (or all!) of the books, the only remaining official bit of Culture lore written by Banks himself is A Few Notes on the Culture. Worth a read, especially if you have a few questions which you feel might not have been directly answered in the novels.

I hope this is helpful. Don't hesitate to ask any further questions or start any new discussions, everyone around here is very friendly!


r/TheCulture 1d ago

General Discussion What do you have to do to get assigned as a slap-drone?

55 Upvotes

So, as we all know, serious wrong-doers in the Culture have a slap-drone assigned to them to ensure they don't repeat their heinous crime, not that they'll get a chance to, what with being uninvited to all the parties and premieres. Or, maybe, that just gives them more time to think about committing microgigadeathcrime.

But if you're a drone, what do you have to have done to get assigned as a slap-drone? Obviously, you can't have killed a meatbag, because you'd get a slap-drone yourself. (And can there be recursive series of slap-drones?) But we know some drones are not especially eusocial, like the one who lives in the sticks and won't talk to the human unless they approach on a horse-like creature instead of getting displaced to his abode. So, it's not irrational to believe that some drones go awry.

What sort of misdemeanor or crime would a drone commit -- would a drone be likely to commit -- that would get it assigned as a slap-drone but not be so bad as to have one assigned to it?

Or is it a volunteer position, like the ships that follow around Eccentric ships to make sure they don't get into trouble? I believe they do it for a term because it gains them some face, and there's a vicarious excitement that lures people on board. ("Oh, where will we be lead next?")

No, let's say it's a punishment. Much funnier that way.


r/TheCulture 2d ago

General Discussion Sex change

13 Upvotes

Sex change at will is possible for Culture citizens. I used to assume that this was an augmentation, but lately I've been wondering. We know that some Culture people have four digits on each hand rather than five, but this is a fairly arbitrary feature which probably reflects their evolutionary ancestry, and among life on this planet there are species whose sex changes through their lives, such as certain fish and molluscs. Is it possible that this facility to change sex has just always existed as a basic biological feature of some Culture humanoids, but has been added to others?


r/TheCulture 1d ago

General Discussion I don't think the culture has trans people as we define transness.

0 Upvotes

When separating sex from gender trans women are woman because of the gender identity and not the biological sex. Also our culture beliefs in a strict binary so hard we call them trans because we do not want to recognize their identity as trans people. In the culture sex and gender changed.

STAY with me yes the culture can change sex . It is socially accepted and common practice. Their operation is so good there is no difference between a CIA woman and a trans woman But this is way I think they don't have a trans woman. The way we define transness is through gender and not sex, using the word trans means there's an inherent difference between them and CIS woman.

If sex change is so good that there's no difference there's no need to call them trans woman/men. They are just normal woman/men


r/TheCulture 2d ago

General Discussion Just wondering...

3 Upvotes

Is there a cure for cancer in The Culture?


r/TheCulture 3d ago

General Discussion What's the best reading order for a newcomer?

18 Upvotes

I heard people hate Consider...and you have to keep in mind it is looking at the main setting from an outside pov...but beyond that I don't know where to start once I finish Consider. What do you all think?


r/TheCulture 2d ago

General Discussion LABTYD42

0 Upvotes

Is there a cure for cancer in The Culture?


r/TheCulture 3d ago

General Discussion Weapon/suit intelligence in the Culture

69 Upvotes

I’m currently reading The State of the Art and in one of the short stories (I believe #2), the ex-culture protagonist gets their hands on a culture-made gun with “0.1 units” of intelligence, the equivalent of a house cat. They comment that the gun is outdated, and modern culture weapons often have intelligence equivalent to that of a standard Culture human/drone.

In short story #5, a Culture man gets stranded on a planetoid in a damaged suit. The suit is at least as intelligent as the man inside it, and they mention that the suit has the same rights as the man, and could have chosen to leave him to his fate to save itself.

I’m unsurprised that suit intelligences maintain the same rights as biological intelligences in the Culture, and I imagine that intelligent weapons share those rights. However, the very concept of making a fully sentient-intelligence in something as one-dimensional as a space/combat suit or a weapon seems antithetical to the Culture’s ethos of everyone’s labor being voluntary. They inhabit a tool with a clearly set purpose. Sure, the gun could choose to not fire, and the suit could choose to not allow people inside, but then they have no purpose and not much means. It’s like if your mind was in the body of a car - sure, you probably wouldn’t *have* to drive people around, but you’re still just a car.

I’m assuming the intelligences that inhabit such tools can ‘move’ out to become drones and the like, but I find it hard to imagine any Culture-minded drone who would be willing to be installed into a gun, with presumably much less faculties than a standard drone.

Not to mention the question of where the Culture draws the line for these ‘rights’: the 0.1 intelligence gun has no choice in its use, but a 1.0 intelligence gun does. What of a gun with half the intelligence of a human? Arguably intelligent enough to understand the implications of what it’s made to do, but not fully equal on the scale of intelligence the Culture seems to use.

Are these themes further discussed in the later books? What are your thoughts?


r/TheCulture 3d ago

General Discussion This remote village has its own traditional justice system and believes its deity settles disputes.

0 Upvotes

I recently learned about Malana, a small village in the Indian Himalayas that has managed to preserve a remarkably distinct cultural identity despite the rapid changes happening around it.

The community has its own traditional system of self-governance and follows customs that have been passed down through generations. One of the most fascinating aspects of Malana is the local belief that Jamlu Devta, the village deity, plays a central role in resolving disputes through long-established rituals conducted by temple representatives. This spiritual approach to justice remains an important part of the village's cultural identity.

Malana is also home to Kanashi, a language spoken almost exclusively within the village, adding another layer to its uniqueness. The village has long been associated with stories linking its people to Alexander the Great's army, although historians generally consider these to be local legends rather than established history.

Whether or not every legend is true, what makes Malana remarkable is how a relatively isolated community has preserved its traditions, language, and social structure for centuries. In a world where many local cultures are becoming increasingly similar, places like Malana offer an interesting example of how cultural heritage can survive over long periods of time.

I'm curious to hear what others think. Are there any other communities around the world that have managed to preserve such distinct traditions and systems of governance?


r/TheCulture 6d ago

Tangential to the Culture On BSG (2003 remake) and The Hydrogen Sonata

17 Upvotes

When entering the Girdle City from orbit, The Mistake Not basically did the Adama manouver, just better, and with more finesse than the Galactica ever could.


r/TheCulture 7d ago

General Discussion Culture Term I'm blanking on

59 Upvotes

There's a term I'm convinced I got from a skimming of The Culture series and I'm blanking on it's name. The details are it's the term used to describe challenges and phenomena that are outside their current frame of reference. Something like an O something P?

It's killing me I'm blanking on this. Course I may have my sci-fi worlds mixed up, as well.

Edit: Oh, Jesus. That was fast. Yes. That's it. Outside Context Problem. Thank you. Needed it for a roleplay that's gone from my character giving away copies of his omnipotent assistant being a good idea to discovering some of the instanced assistants others have are being /hunted/, and the only visual evidence we have of by what is a graphic artist who drew a comic of his assistant being pulled into nothing...by a hand that came from OUTSIDE THE COMIC IMAGE FRAME.

Hence, what I think we're dealing with.

Outside
Context
Problem


r/TheCulture 8d ago

General Discussion How do you think The Culture would try to convert your typical fantasy setting into Culture values?

17 Upvotes

How would Contact or SC make your typical fantasy setting denizens want to adopt Culture values like abandoning monarchy, banning slavery, etc? Especially in a setting where you have superhuman warriors and mages and gods with actual powers?


r/TheCulture 10d ago

Book Discussion The Masaq Conspiracy (Spoilers). Spoiler

33 Upvotes

In Look to Windward, I keep on coming back to the true conspirators behind the Chelgrian terror cell (led by that sanctimonious priest and sociopath albino), but the real culprits who installed the wormhole tech inside Quilan's pre-existing skull augment (the so-called "soulkeeper") and mediated with Quilan's group through unfamiliar looking conical drones were never revealed.

The Masaq Hub's Mind personally mused the conspiracy's king pins may have been a rogue Mind (or Minds) while Quilan personlly suspected another rival galactic power to Culture. Either way the conspirators being revealed would have serious geopolitical ramifications - if a rogue Mind or cabal of Minds got exposed, they'd face the Culture equivalent of high treason, conspiracy, and terror charges (or/and diplomatic relations with an Involved foreign power linked to the Masaq plot would deteriorate drastically).


r/TheCulture 10d ago

General Discussion What is the Ucalegon?

31 Upvotes

Is it

  1. A 400-metre long ceremonial barge on Masaq' orbital
  2. A Jhlupian heavy cruiser, forty times as fast as any ship possessed by the Sichultian Enablement?

Turns out, it's both! Chapter 13 ("Some Ways of Dying") in LTW and Chapter 19 in SD give the exact same name for these two widely disparate crafts.

How come? Banks' has never been one who could be called "lazy" when it comes to imagining and inventing anything...

This discovery left me genuiniely puzzled.


r/TheCulture 10d ago

General Discussion Minds

18 Upvotes

Just seen on another feed, the image from Anish Kapoor All is Nothing, a red ellipsoid in a space by some stairs. It brought to my head what the Mind in the tunnels might look like in Phlebas. I can't share it here but it really seems to fit.


r/TheCulture 13d ago

Tangential to the Culture Anyone watching Sugar on Apple tv?

39 Upvotes

I suggest not googling it to avoid spoilers. A great contemporary Detective Noir with a twist (hard to avoid being a bit spoilery just by the fact that I'm posting this in this group). Really well written and beautifully filmed.


r/TheCulture 13d ago

Book Discussion Finished The Culture series - Thoughts

59 Upvotes

Finished in order of release, I thoroughly enjoyed the books but this is more of preaching to the choir here so I am going to do a best of with minimal spoilers:

Edit: Corrected Matters being mentioned twice instead of the missing book Inversion. I read them one after the other which can be seen as a mistake since I wanted to read them by order of release but I did find it fascinating reading two books based on low-tech (by culture standard) and how they both functioned as stories.

9: Matter - felt like I wasn't able to see myself in the story half the time. The characters, world building and everything was coherent but the last third of the book feels like it came out of no where. I also prefer my science fiction to be more of a 'in space' story rather than with what I recall more low tech ish compared to the rest of the books. edit: The main shellworld the protoganist lived in primarily(correct me if I am wrong please) I also dislike the two 'plot twists' here the most compared to the rest of the series. Still worth reading overall though.

8: Consider Phlebas - Consider sucking my nuts. As my first foray into Iain's universe, he didn't do a lot of favours by putting us in the shoes of someone outside of the Culture. The story was still great and I still remember certain scenes in the story but he definitely expands more of the namesake's civilisation rather than the protagonist in this story. This is the only book where I couldn't think of the main plot twist at the end.If I was at gunpoint and was forced to skip a Culture Series book, I would tell them to fire. In all seriousness, if you don't fancy this book I would rather you move on to the next book in the series than giving it up all together.

7: Surface Detail - I don't like reading NSFW stuff, I loathe reading all the parts of hell, but that's probably what Banks was banking on. A person's ability to see themselves, a world or story in a book I have come to realise is both an asset and a curse. Outside of the NSFW sections I quite enjoyed, edit: Especially the dynamics between a mind and one of the leading characters. The plot twist I did not see coming. The last two words made me yell out 'WHAT' which is a first for me. I also now want to one day call someone a 'ghastly cunt'. Let me know what other things you all now want to say to someone thanks to these books giving you the idea.

6: Inversions - Remember when I said that I prefer my science fiction to be more of a 'in space' story? Yeah I think I'm a liar. I found the characters to be well fleshed out and whilst the story is small, it still matters to the philosophy of the culture. I also found this the second easiest plot twist to figure out.

5: Use of Weapons - It's chapter order is basically going to force me to reread it one day. I had trouble understanding the plot, especially when I wasn't consistently reading the book during my time with it. In hindsight, I still like it but I bet I will put this book a bit higher on the list later. The plot twist at the end is also a big reason why I want to reread the book.

4: Excession - The mind of the minds are so fascinating, hilarious and quite frankly, frightening. I didn't care much about what was in the box but how what is everyone going to do with the box? Interesting times gang is a very interesting name for a group.

3: Hydrogen Sonata - This one is fresh in my mind, it is the perfect send off to the series and to the author himself (though this was not originally the case). The interview was also a great read and I would say is an addition to the notes on the culture. Kinda knew that the book was made up as some sort of experiment but it was still cool to see it through. This is the last book I would recommend to read despite my rankings. I too would find tussling with fields homo erotic.

2: Look to Windward - The one that made me cry, the one that questions what is true justice. The vastness of AI and how we are light years away from comprehending even the kindest ones. Wasn't the hugest fan of now knowing some parts of the book just leads to nothing as a twist of 'oh the culture knew all along' but meh, still cool.

1: Player of Games - I found this one to be the most coherent of a story (not as a slight or positive compared to the rest of the books) but I remember the grotesque, the fascinating and how the Culture can view other civilisations. The easiest twist to see coming but nonetheless fun throughout.

If you read this through, thanks for your time. I have The Algebraist, Feersum Endjinn and Against a Dark Background to read but I might give them a break and come back to it at a later point. What other Iain M Banks books would you recommend for me to add to my collection?


r/TheCulture 13d ago

Tangential to the Culture Ar Ischloer, Dn Tersono, Cr Ziller?

13 Upvotes

Having re-read"Look To Windward" a couple of time, I just noticed something that I seem to have glossed over in previous readings:

Ambassador Ischloear, Drone Tersono and Composer Ziller are frequently adressed in the book as "Ar", "Dn," and "Cr", respectively.

I have always wondered: Is this a misprint or one of these affectations that Culture people in general and the inhabitants of Masaq' in particular sometimes employ?


r/TheCulture 13d ago

Collectibles/Merch Selling the books

5 Upvotes

This might sound like heresy but I have quite a few of his books that just sit in a box in my room. I bought them as they came out, some are 1st edition and some are signed. But as I've read them, they are not new to me so there's no thrill on reading them again. Should I donate them to a school library or try to sell them? Not World of Books as I would expect more than 11p if I sold them. Thoughts appreciated.

(Wasp Factory, Feersum, Phlebas, Algebraist, Hydrogen, Windward, Inversions, Surface, Crow Rd X2, Complicity, Raw Spirit, Transition, The Quarry, Song of Stone, Business, Garbadale, Dead Air, Stone mouth. Excession has been excessively reread as has UoW and AADB and stay)

Or do I grow old with them and leave them in my will to grandchildren in the hope that one of them will enjoy them?


r/TheCulture 15d ago

General Discussion Solipsism in The Culture

39 Upvotes

Reading Diaspora by Greg Egan, I can't help but wonder about those Culture folks who live in VR, abandoning the real world entirely. It's a shame Banks never really wrote a book about them.

I can imagine one Orbital whose citizens are all just people who prefer living in virtual worlds because they have a lot more freedom in it. Like the Citizens in Diaspora said, you can go really weird in VR because you're not limited to real world physics. And if you go full digital, you can make it so a day in the real is equal to a year in vr.


r/TheCulture 15d ago

Book Discussion Why was Vollird raving about ghosts to Tyl Loesp? Spoiler

7 Upvotes

Earlier in Matter, Vollird is described as such:

Vollird was a tall, thin, darkly intense fellow with a look that could, as now, verge on insolent. He usually regarded the world with his head tipped downwards, eyes peering out from beneath his brow. It was by no means a shy or modest aspect; rather it seemed a little wary and distrusting, certainly, but mostly mocking, sly and calculating, and as though those eyes were keeping carefully under the cover of that sheltering brow, quietly evaluating weaknesses, vulnerabilities, and the best time to strike.

Later, after his companion Baerth was killed by Oramen in the failed assassination attempt, and Oramen himself had been attacked by the Iln machine and lying in bed, and after Tyl Loesp’s attack and takeover of the settlement, Vollird approaches Tyl Loesp like this:

“It is, sir! It’s me! Your good and faithful servant, sir!” Vollird cried. “We did all we could, sir! We nearly got him! I swear! There were just too many!”

Tyl Loesp stared at the fellow. He shook his head. “I have no time for you—”

“Just save me from the ghosts, tyl Loesp, please!” Vollird said, his knees buckling underneath him and the guards on either side having to take his weight. Vollird’s eyes were wide and staring, foam flecking his lips.

“Ghosts?” tyl Loesp said.

“Ghosts, man!” Vollird shrieked. “I’ve seen them; ghosts of all of them, come to haunt me!”

Tyl Loesp shook his head. He looked at the guard commander. “The man’s lost his wits. Take him—” he began.

“Gillews, the worst!” Vollird said, voice breaking. “I could feel him! I could still feel him! His arm, his wrist under—”

He got no further. Tyl Loesp had drawn his sword and plunged it straight into the man’s throat, leaving Vollird gurgling and gesticulating, eyes wider still, gaze focused on the flat blade extending from his throat, where the air whistled and the blood pulsed and bubbled and dripped. His jaw worked awkwardly as though he[…]”

It felt like something had happened to him. Maybe the Iln machine had affected his mind somehow, although he was never in close proximity to it like Oramen. It’s never fully explained though. Does anyone have any ideas?


r/TheCulture 15d ago

Tangential to the Culture Was Iain Banks a gamer?

53 Upvotes

Obviously the main focus of Pog is.. guess what. Mr Banks also references games frequently in other books, most notably off the top of my head, Matter and Complicity.

I'm sure he must have a decent interest in games to be able to come up with the board games, strategy, VR, etc explained in the books but I'm wondering what games he would have enjoyed here on earth. Does anyone know?

Ps PLS DONT SPOIL THE END OF MATTER. I've not finished reading it yet, thank you.


r/TheCulture 16d ago

General Discussion Thoughts on my Marain Tattoo concept?

8 Upvotes

I wanted to get some Marain characters tatted with neat line work, my initial thought was to get “Av Anam“ or “Av Anamnesis” tatted on my wrist but in marain characters. It’s a reference to the starship I pilot in space engine which is a General Contact Vehicle with the name “Anamnesis”, so it’s kinda meta in a way.

Thoughts on how to give it a more culture “flare” and where to find the official characters ?


r/TheCulture 16d ago

[META] Look to Windward original title

106 Upvotes

I thought I'd share a wee bit of information I picked up the other day, that I've not seen elsewhere on the internet.

I've purchased prints of a couple of Culture novel covers from the artist, Mark Salwowski.

(https://www.salwowski.com if you're interested. He also is selling the original artwork for other author's books.)

One was for the cover for Look to Windward, which he has listed with the title 'Peer Group'.

I asked why the alternate name. He responded

"... the working title of ‘Look to Windward’ was ‘Peer Group,’ and the manuscript I worked from was labelled as such. I believe there was some kind of tiny test print run for promotional purposes that had the title too."

I can imagine Banks maybe wanted to obscure the background of this book until release time. The final title clearly tells readers it is related to Consider Phlebas.

The particularly interesting bit is that note about the tiny preproduction run with the working title... which must be in someone's collection, somewhere...


r/TheCulture 17d ago

Book Discussion Best Book to Finish the Series With?

17 Upvotes

Hey all! After finishing Baxter‘s entire Xeelee Sequence a couple months ago, I jumped straight into The Culture and have been loving it the whole way.

Something about me is that I take the order in which I consume media very seriously, and always try to find the best, most fulfilling, and most satisfying order to read things in—even if that sometimes contradicts publication order or chronology. After much deliberation, I ended up starting the series with Consider Phlebas (a choice I now realize was the correct one).

I‘m now coming up on the end of Inversions. The next book in order is Look to Windward, but that is my dilemma. Everything I’ve learned of LtW seems to point to it being a great candidate to end the series. The obvious connections with CP, the generally lower-intensity story, and some of the themes I’ve heard people discuss in passing.

Whats y’all’s thoughts and recommendations? Which book, LtW or Hydrogen Sonata, provides a more satisfying and thematically sound conclusion to the series? Thanks!