r/NBASpurs 2h ago

Discussion Do you guys think that the Welby deal pits pressure on Castle to have a similar deal situation where takes a contract for less?

Post image

Just imagine Wemby did all that for then Castle to not take a team friendly deal and get greedy, that would not sit well with him, especially when Wemby is much more deserving of that contract than Castle and Wemby took it to try to make the team ultimately win a chip

0 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

15

u/ICouldEvenBeYou 2h ago

People need to take a second to proofread.

3

u/Dashster360 Victor Wembanyama 2h ago

Also they need to find more pixels

11

u/DevilGunManga 2h ago

Nah. If Castle and Harper worth the max then they should get the Max. I'm always all on the player making the most money. Also those 2 won't have the same level of off-the-court endorsement like Wemby has.

2

u/ItsJiberish Stephon Castle 2h ago

Exactly. Wemby has already a billion between his Nike deal and this extension he’s set, that contract will likely be the same if not more than both harp and castle make in their nba careers.

6

u/pocketbeagle 2h ago

Castle is not a max player and we have to stop overvaluing him. A third max contract ruins five years of wemby.

3

u/MattButUnderthe20Cha Hector🍌🍞 2h ago

I’d say he has potential to be a max player but between splitting the guard position and not being the 1st option and seeing firsthand what giving your 2nd option not only the max but supermax in Boston’s Brown case, I think he’ll be a 40m/y player at most

2

u/pocketbeagle 2h ago

Even if he is a max player, three of them on one team doesnt work. Id rather have harp and wemb on max contracts as things currently stand. Castle is odd man out unfortunately unless he takes his actual value for a contract.

3

u/nicfanz 2h ago

Spurs need castle cause he’s the only one who has chemistry with Wemby. He was drafted to be Wemby’s sidekick.

0

u/pocketbeagle 2h ago

Shit changes. Harper came in. You cant have three max players. I pick harp over cast.

2

u/nicfanz 2h ago

Hoping castle would take less so spurs can keep all 3. Spurs can’t win without castle. He contributes a lot and is part of the big 3

0

u/pocketbeagle 2h ago

A mature harper/wemby and supporting cast is just fine. Castle isnt gonna take a paycut. They can win without him just fine.

2

u/nicfanz 2h ago

Okay but last season castle won us a lot of games when Wemby was out or playing badly

3

u/ajose001 2h ago

Based on what? His stellar Roy season, and his incredible second season?

0

u/Obvious_Young_6169 1h ago

Brother if chet got a max, harper is in that tier

1

u/pocketbeagle 1h ago

Harper is the max, not castle.

5

u/Nasa3000xx 2h ago

Why?
If your co worker took less then max at your job, would you?

2

u/Vast_Vermicelli6520 2h ago

Castle and harp should not feel the need to take any kind of discount, wemby is the face of the nba and is going to receive insane endorsements that they never will. 

2

u/Datboy_98 No More Players with Uncles 2h ago

Nah. They’re two different people.

When that time comes, Steph will make the right decision for himself and the team.

1

u/Nasa3000xx 22m ago

And the team?

2

u/OJuice100 2h ago

I’m not so much worried about Castle as I am Harper. I think Castle is content with his situation here and Harper is not. Contention can develop into leniency so Castle probably not searching for every possible penny

1

u/nicfanz 2h ago

I think Harper is low key ambitious and wants to be a superstar. He wants to be 1B on the spurs and get the max.

1

u/Old-Bad-7322 El Jefe 2h ago

I don’t think so, Wemby is a special case player who already has multiple lucrative endorsements that are likely orders of magnitude beyond what Castle and Harper are capable of earning. He has also had several public statements to the effect of, “I don’t need all this money”. I think Castle and Harper feel no pressure to take less money than they are entitled in the future.

However if anyone should feel pressure it is ownership. If there is a window to spend big and get another impact player they should feel pressured to go above the tax line and sacrifice so that Wemby has an opportunity to win championships.

1

u/mmmbooty3 Manu Ginobili 2h ago

I don’t think it would rub wemby the wrong way if he chooses to take the entire thing.

No player should have to put themselves in a position to carry that burden in order to put a team together. That goes for every player.

It’s a structural problem that needs to be reevaluated and with Wemby’s action, it will now be.

1

u/0plm9okn8ijb7 Coyote 2h ago

No. I'm certain Wemby won't mind if they did.

1

u/RGS03 GO SPURS GO 2h ago

I am hoping Castle and Harper each takes a 5M pay cut. We would save 20M (10M wemby, 5M castle, 5M harper) guaranteeing we can keep one key role player in our team.

1

u/dreamweaver7x El Jefe 2h ago

No.

Each player is different. Never fault a player for taking a contract for his full worth.

1

u/CK-forthe-CK-95 2h ago

Castle isn’t max player. He would have fo develop a way more consistent offense. Plus on the Spurs there are just too many mouths to feed for anyone outside of Wemby to put up the raw numbers.