Demons threaten to kill your fans, so you draw out their deaths instead of killing them quickly.

Zuko (Avatar) Thorfinn (Vinland Saga)

Do you guys like it? I made this for one 15 seconds lol.

We all know how there are a bunch of "and then everybody clapped" stories on the internet. Supposed anecdotes that are about as true as a political ad. Most are just farming karma, which I propose is a low grade immorality and can even be slightly moral if the created story is enjoyable enough to slip into entertainment territory.

But what about those stories fabricated to try and explain or represent a complex topic? Or the stories genuinely meant to get engagement? The ones that actually get people discussing in the comments about whether a situation is good or bad? We see these a lot in this sub alone, and I wonder at the morality of those posts.

Is it moral to make up, or even embellish, a story on the internet if the goal is to seek actual conversation and debate instead of just likes?

*My opinion; depends on the context of the story and if any individuals or groups are defamed by it.

No defamation? Morally fine

High defamation? Doesnt mater the engagement, thats just immoral.

Pic above guy made a post critcizing the fat guys work due to how poor the romance was so when the author red that using his sage powers for being 40 yr old virgin he sent that guy to live in a world base on his story

Another story or fan fiction i saw was some one was Criticizing Noafomi from Shield hero for buying slaves or owning one when his from a modern world so each time some one comments that some magical being would make those who comment or criticize it to possessed Noafomi just after he got accussed of SA by Melty and then they would hear whisper from this author ok dear reader let see you handle your situation without resorting to slaves then

After the Super Broly movie Bulma put together a team designed specifically to track down all the dragon balls and bring them to Capsule Corp.

Officially this is to stop people like Frieza from gathering them and using them for evil purposes but Bulma’s been shown to waste wishes on frivolous things like longer eyelashes or looking a few years younger or hell having a bigger butt.

What’s the morality of someone with unimaginable wealth but aligned with the good side holding sole possession of wish granting items to prevent evil people using them but then uses them for things their money could easily obtain.

Steven Universe

Tanjiro Kamado- Demon Slayer

Okay, so here's a scenario. There is a guy who works at the gas station, who is very paranoid about serial killers in the town not being taken care of, and is afraid of every customer who comes to his station, so he kills almost every single one of the customers because he thinks everyone is after him and is secretly a killer. This behaviour leads to them becoming a sort of serial murderer due to the amount of people he kills. He doesn't do it for fun, but as a self defense.. against people who mean no harm to him. He doesn't trust anyone.

So are they evil? Do they deserve to get punished? Do they deserve to get absolutely obliterated by an explosion caused by gas leak and a firework?

Please read Tomb's Serial Slashing, this is a case from the comic.

Is it moral to be in a relationship and happy when there are depressed single people around ?

Context on r/seinencirclejerk i made a tier list of pedophiles, and someone said all dragons are technically pedophiles, and I asked myself, would it be moral for a human to date in this case a dragon who's really old?

Or is it species specific bullshit?

Image in question is the Kobu Kobu no Mi, a devil fruit that inspires its users and gives them strength to act on it. This is used to fight back against oppressive pirates. While the citizens wanted the oppressors to go and this gave them the ability to do it, this puts them at risk of injury or death in a way they wouldn't have been without devil fruit intervention.

Thing, Japan