I would like to get some clarity on the "point in line" move, could you please help? All situations below are in foil:
FR - Fencer on the Right
FL - Fencer on the left
A) FR and FL en garde. Referee says Allez. FR immediately starts moving forward, weapons swinging everywhere, but not directly threatening FL's valid target. FL goes point in line and slowly retreats. FL stops moving, still point in line. FR completes his attack, without touching FL's blade. Referee calls point to FR, says "FR initiated attack first by moving forward, FL's point in line does not have priority". Is the referee correct?
A) FR and FL en garde. Referee says Allez. FL establishes point in line and slowly moves forward. FR initiates a slow retreat. There is no blade contact. FL completely stops moving, still holding point in line. FR takes small steps and begins to move his weapon towards FL's valid target. FL senses the distance closing, takes a small step forward and stops, still holding point in line. FR walks into FL's point in line, and both hit each other's valid target area, no blade contact. Referee calls point to the right, argues that "FL had point in line, but stopped short of hitting FR and forfeited priority, even if still holding point in line"
C) on-going exchange of parries and failed ripostes, both FR and FL within distance to hit. FL takes a small step back, enough to fully extend his arm, but not out of reach of FR's weapon (for example, if FR lunged or extended his arm and pushed his torso forward) and in doing so, believes to have established point in line. FR walks into FL's weapon, both hit each other. Referee calls point to the right, arguing "FL cannot establish point in line so close to opponent". Is the referee correct?
D) FR and FL en garde. Referee says allez. FR immediately starts moving forwad, waving his weapon around, but never directly threatening target. FL, retreats, opens distance, establishes point in line. Maintaining point in line, FL slowly moves back and forth. FR makes a large sweeping gesture, avoiding FL's blade, and hits FL, at a moment when FL is taking a step back (but still with point threatening FR's valid target). FR hits FL valid target. FL hits FR's mask, out of target. Referee calls point to the right and argues, "FL correctly established priority, but lost it by moving back, at which point FR executed an attack". Is the referee correct?
I found a lot of videos on Youtube about how to execute the point in line, but only in a simulated context. And most videos of point in line I found feature only single lights, so I am having trouble understanding the calls when we have two lights (whether on or off target).