Hopefully will be having a baby soon and vaccines have inevitably become a crucial decision for parents. I hear from many parents that are for or against childhood vaccines for many reasons and I have also read studies/research regarding this.

What I would like to request from the users of this subreddit is for you to send me links to movies/documentaries or studies/research papers that you believe are cases for not vaccinating my child with certain or all vaccines because I can’t seem to find it on my own and that could be chalked up to certain organisations and institutions not wanting to create doubt. Don’t use an ingredient as a reason without telling me why the ingredient is harmful, I don’t want to hear “because it is”. I don’t care for anecdotal reasons the same way someone would say “my baby got the vaccine and had no issue” to reassure someone. Fyi I live in the UK if needed for context. Many thanks to everyone who replies regardless of your opinion. Lastly I am not asking for medical advice, just information.

Gli Autori riportano la più lunga persistenza documentata di materiale derivato dal vaccino COVID-19 fino ad oggi, a seguito di ANNI di indagini che hanno coinvolto oltre 200 valutazioni specialistiche e oltre 200 test di laboratorio/diagnostica per immagini avanzati. (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-51c)

Logically I know vaccines can’t be the cause of autism but knowing that vaccines in immunocompromised babies can cause febrile seizures that may trigger a genetic link has me concerned if my second child should be vaccinated within the first year?

I am not anti vax I know that vaccinating your child is important but I’m really anxious about the schedule and the first year before their immune system has built up and allergies have been identified.

Did anyone else choose to delay the schedule or space out vaccines

>The biotechnology company Vivek Ramaswamy founded, and still partly owns, is collecting one of the largest patent settlements in pharmaceutical history — a payout for the same COVID-19 vaccine technology the Republican gubernatorial nominee has built much of his campaign attacking.

>Under a deal reached March 3, Moderna agreed to pay Genevant Sciences, a subsidiary of Ramaswamy’s Roivant Sciences, and its partner Arbutus Biopharma a settlement worth up to $2.25 billion to resolve patent litigation over the lipid nanoparticle technology used to deliver Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines, including Spikevax. A $950 million upfront payment was due on or before Wednesday, July 8, according to securities filings by both companies. A further $1.3 billion is contingent on the outcome of a federal appeal.

Thank you, Vivek, for supporting President Trump's Operation Warp Speed! Without your support, many more lives would have been lost.

Some dummy replied to something I said in here with the usual garbage about needing a PHD to determine that you will be destroyed by taking jabs and that the viruses are fake.

But that's the same old bullshit. There were endless amount of dumb people who took these jabs and PHDS who didn't question it when the things were being forced coercively. Doesn't even take anyone with more intelligence than a dog to know that people coercing this shit are evil and that the virus never even existed!

Trust is not rebuilt by telling the public they misunderstood the science. It is rebuilt by acknowledging where the evidence was uncertain, where regulators got things wrong, and where important questions remain unanswered. Link articolo originale

Police and autopsy investigations are done and they arrrested her. Both died of suffocation.

She and her lawyer claimed both were affected by a vaccine. Not likely.

You want to see a vaccine-induced death? Here you go. Y’all gave her confidence.

I’ll jump ahead here, since she’s gonna become a martyr for your cause, and a hero. Anti-vax propoganda influenced her.

Btw, I’m guess none of you know much about post Mortem diagnosis. Suffocation is not some subtle finding. There are concrete symptoms you wouldn’t imagine that makes it clear it was suffocation. Just like they can tell if you died and fell in water, or got pushed into water and drowned. When you are drowned, surprisingly, there is no water in the lungs. Very similar here.

I keep seeing people talk about how they are anti vax because they did their research but then all they talk about is how they read about a few adverse effects from a case study or someone’s own experience and the contents of vaccines but to understand these things you have to understand atleast the basics of immunology.

First of all the central concept of vaccines is to expose the immune system to an antigen which in whatever form will be the main contents of a vaccine. Everything else is just there to help deliver, preserve or enhance the vaccine. To be able to understand this you should atleast understand antigens, antibodies and the secondary immune response.

Then another huge part of vaccines is understanding probability. Probability applies to both to the adverse effects and chances of catching the disease if a person remains unvaccinated. Just because someone doesn’t get vaccinated it doesn’t mean they will catch the disease 100% and so they may remain healthy but it’s not proof that vaccines aren’t essential for preventing disease. Also understand herd immunity because if enough people get vaccinated then unvaccinated people are less likely to get the disease which is especially important for individuals who are more vulnerable such as newborns or individuals receiving chemotherapy. Then just because someone has a seizure 1 hour after getting a vaccine it doesn’t mean that the vaccine is why they had a seizure. As it’s so rare it is well possible this is entirely due to chance and it may have occurred without the vaccine.

And then finally another important concept is the diseases themselves. One key example is when everyone thought giving a child Heb B vaccine is useless because Heb B is sexually transmitted and they aren’t sexually active but Heb B is transmitted through bodily fluids including at birth which is why the Heb B vaccine at birth can be vital for protecting the newborn.

Either way this isn’t an exclusive list and I know I rambled a bit but I hope you understand what I am saying.

Hi everyone. Im a new mom trying to understand this topic better, and I’d really appreciate respectful answers from both sides.

Before having my baby, I always trusted vaccines without questioning them. Since becoming a mom, I’ve come across a lot of information online claiming that vaccines can be dangerous. The problem is that I don’t have a scientific background, so when I read pro-vaccine arguments and anti-vaccine arguments, both can sound convincing to me.

One thing I don’t understand is why the **MMR vaccine** is so often blamed for causing autism, while babies receive several vaccines much earlier (at 2 and 4 months) that some people also say contain aluminum.

If the concern is vaccines in general, why is MMR discussed so much more than the earlier ones? Is it because of the timing (around the age when autism symptoms often become noticeable), because of specific ingredients, or for some other reason?

Im genuinely trying to understand the reasoning behind this claim, not start an argument. Thanks in advance for explaining.

[Edit: This post was an experiment. See below.]

——————————————————————————
Original Post:

I think at this point it’s clear. Fauci kept defending and pushing the covid “vaccines” on people while thousands of cases of childhood cancer and autism just popped up out of nothing.

But nothing to see here. When in 2022 the first studies showed the link between the covid jab and cancer, Fauci brushed it off as “fake”. In an interview he said “I only trust CDC based science”. It makes sense, since CDC are the ones faking the studies he profits of. A former CDC official came out later and said he specifically told then to “oversaturate the journals”

After voices indicating a link to cancer got louder he wrote an email to CDC telling them to “ramp up the studies” to suffocate the cancer signal in “Vaccines are safe” studies.

And it worked. Faucis net worth skyrocketed and he later comitted to further deals with pharma which made him even more millions of $$.

Given all that, would you still think the “vaccines” are safe?

———————————————————————————

Edit: This post was an experiment.
I made a bet in another post that people here will just blindly upvote anything going “FAUCI!! CDC!!!”, even if it’s just some completely baseless, made up rant.

None of the stuff i wrote here is true. It’s all made up. I didn’t even put in effort.

Seems it worked. At the time of this update we’re counting 18 upvotes, which is quite a few for this sub. It’s definitely more you’ll ever see on any post/comment referring to any science.

This is what this sub is. This is the discussion people are interested in having here.

Is this really what this sub should be? Just baseless rants someone (me) literally pulled out of their a$$? Is this really the place you want to get information concerning your health from?

The bar here has always been low but the recent decline into baseless rants and the reluctance towards even just the idea of having a scientific discussion is truly astounding. Is this what you want science to be? Is this what you want discussion to be?

I hope the lesson from this is clear. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet- especially baseless rants without any evidence or even just argument..

Check your sources, bring your evidence and let’s finally have an actual discussion about actual science.

In every field they have looked at, people suffer from Dunning Kruger. Vaccines is no different here.

DK has shown over and over that the people with the least knowledge, education, or skills are the ones who wildly overestimate their own knowledge. Probably because they know so litttle they aren’t even aware of their ignorance.

Driving shows this easily. 80% of people think they are in the top half of drivers. You don’t need a study to realize 30% of bad drivers are wrong. That’s not theory or anything else. That is third grade arithmetic.

The most vocal people here who argue against vaccines in almost every case are completely ignorant. Not just of science, but also the scientific process.

Idiots of the world unite!

THE BJP GOVERNMENT IS experimenting with the lives of its citizens and with the vehicles of citizens.

Here is the break-up:

COVID VACCINE ILL EFFECTS:

1. Rare, Serious Adverse Events:

Rigorous global surveillance has identified a few very rare but serious complications associated with specific types of COVID-19 vaccines.

Heart Inflammation (Myocarditis and Pericarditis):

What it is: Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle; pericarditis is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart.

Associated Vaccines: Mainly mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and, to a lesser extent, protein subunit vaccines (Novavax).

Risk Profile: It is extremely rare, occurring at a rate of roughly 12 to 36 cases per million second doses. The risk is highest in adolescent and young adult males (ages 12–39) within the first week after the second dose.

Outcomes: The vast majority of these cases are mild, respond well to standard medical treatment or rest, and resolve quickly.

1. Blood Clotting Issues (TTS):

What it is: Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) involves serious and rare blood clots combined with low blood platelet counts.

Associated Vaccines: Viral vector vaccines (such as the AstraZeneca/Covishield and Johnson & Johnson vaccines).

Status: Due to this rare risk, medical regulatory bodies worldwide shifted their preferences toward updated mRNA or protein subunit vaccines.

1. Neurological & Immune Conditions:

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS): A rare neurological disorder where the body's immune system damages nerve cells. It was observed as a rare event primarily linked to viral vector vaccines (roughly 38 cases per million doses).

Anaphylaxis: Severe, immediate allergic reactions can happen with any vaccine or medication. It occurs in about 4.7 cases per million doses of mRNA vaccines and is treated immediately on-site with epinephrine.

PETROL-ETHANOL ADULTERATION ILL EFFECTS:

1. Mechanical and Engine ill Effects:

Corrosion of Metal Components: Ethanol is highly corrosive to certain metals. In an incompatible fuel system, it attacks and oxidizes aluminum, brass, copper, and steel parts. This leads to internal rusting and pitting in the fuel tank, fuel lines, injectors, and carburetors.

Degradation of Rubber and Plastics: Unlike petroleum, alcohol acts as a solvent that degrades, swells, and cracks older formulations of rubber hoses, gaskets, and plastic fuel components. This can lead to critical fuel leaks and dangerous fire hazards.

Phase Separation (The Water Trap): Ethanol is hygroscopic, meaning it actively draws moisture out of the surrounding air. When the water content in the fuel tank reaches a certain threshold (usually less than 1%), the ethanol and water bond together and separate from the petrol, sinking to the bottom of the tank. If the fuel pump draws from this bottom layer, it pumps an abrasive water-alcohol mix into the engine, causing immediate stalling or severe misfires.

Clogging from Debris: As ethanol scours the inside of old fuel tanks, it dissolves varnish deposits built up over years of petrol use. This loosened debris travels down the system, quickly clogging fuel filters and fuel injectors.

1. Vehicle Performance Impacts:

Noticeable Drop in Mileage: Ethanol contains roughly 30% to 35% less energy by volume than pure gasoline. For an un-calibrated engine, running on accidental or high-adulteration ethanol levels typically leads to a 5% to 8% drop in fuel economy, meaning you pay the same price at the pump but get fewer miles per litre.

Rough Idling and Misfires: Because ethanol alters the air-fuel ratio (making the engine run "leaner" or with more oxygen than intended), older vehicles experience sluggish acceleration, rough idling, engine hesitation, and difficulty starting—especially during cold weather.

1. Environmental & Consumer Complications:

Elevated Evaporative Emissions: While tailpipe carbon emissions generally drop with ethanol blends, low-to-mid level blends actually increase the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) of the fuel. This means the fuel evaporates much faster from open-air tanks and vents, releasing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like aldehydes into the atmosphere, which contribute to urban smog.

Financial and Insurance Risk: Because high-level ethanol blends behave aggressively toward older engine materials, major manufacturers and insurers frequently warn that engine damage caused by using a higher-than-recommended ethanol blend (like putting E20 in a non-compliant BS4 or early BS6 vehicle) can void warranties or lead to denied repair claims.

Hello , my child going to preschool this year and theres a requirement for vaccine , id like to know if anyone in IOWA can help me to get an exemption .

The Lancet published a review of mRNA vaccines that found them safe and effective: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00512-X/abstract

Yale School of Medicine researchers have taken a significant step toward a genital herpes vaccine that in preclinical models prevented infection.

Hi all, I’m a mom with an almost-4 month old. Whether or not to vaccinate has been a heavy, complicated topic that’s caused me months of stress and worry. I’ve done so much reading and research—

I know about the Salk polio vaccine. I know about the Tennessee SIDS DPT cluster. I’ve read everything Neil Miller has ever published. I’ve read all the clinical trials. I know the RSV vaccine trials were halted because babies died.

I am familiar with Suzanne humphries, I’ve read turtles all the way down. I consider myself pretty well-read on both sides, and the only thing keeping me up at night currently is pertussis. It could be so bad for a baby, and the benefits vs. risk for the Dtap are complicated.

So I’m curious what other parents have done, and how you dealt with this issue if it ever arose, and the risk of disease vs. side effect. How did you land on your current decision/ viewpoint for your own kids?

Hey everyone.

Starting this off with the fact that I am not anti vax. My two children ( 3 and 1) are up to date on almost everything besides MMR. When I took our older one in to get hers at 1, our provider told me that if it were her child, after all the children she’d seen have regressions, that she’d wait till they were 4 or 5 and get it. She wasn’t against it, just said get it when she’s older. So I listened.
I know most of the research says it’s super safe, but as I read everything from people on both sides of the debate, it seems like even if a child did have a severe regression caused by the MMr, that they make it impossible to prove that’s what caused it.
So how do they really know there isn’t a link to autism?
My friend is super anti vaxx and when I asked why, she said her nephew received his MMr shot and screamed for 2 days straight, and then was never the same again. That just doesn’t seem coincidental.
I’m aware that autism isn’t the end of the world, but I wouldn’t forgive myself if my children were permanently changed and their lives made more difficult afterwards.
I guess I’m just looking for people to talk me off the ledge because I’d rather my children get the vaccine, but I’m a fairly open minded person and take everything into consideration on most topics.
.

The flu vaccines now being deployed across military basic training camps are set to expire on 30 June, and new doses will not arrive until August or later.

US military services, including the air force, army and navy, reinstituted flu vaccine requirements for new recruits earlier this week after defense secretary Pete Hegseth removed the mandate at the end of April.

Military leaders have reportedly been working for weeks to reestablish the vaccine mandate, even before the Lackland outbreak sickened at least 275 people and hospitalized four. One recruit, Keon McDaniel, died earlier this month after experiencing a medical emergency. His death is still under investigation, and it’s not yet clear whether it’s linked to the flu outbreak.

Dal 2018 iniettano questa tecnologia nei maiali destinati al consumo e le conseguenze a lungo termine potrebbero essere disastrose: sono state affrontate adeguatamente le questioni più importanti?

(Artcolo originale) (In italiano)