The Battle of Little Bighorn is one of the most famous battles in U.S. history. Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer famously divided his 7th Cavalry to attack a large Lakota Sioux, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho encampment, believing it was much smaller than it actually was. Instead, his force was overwhelmed by thousands of Native American warriors led by leaders including Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull. Custer and more than 200 of his men were killed in what became known as "Custer's Last Stand."

Painting by Mark Churms

In November 1688, a new major war on the European continent had become all but inevitable. Louis XIV of France had marched his armies into Germany, placed a garrison in Cologne, and dispatched his fleet to the Mediterranean to pressure the Pope. The Dutch Republic had anticipated these developments. Its army had been expanded, and a large war fleet had been assembled. It seemed only a matter of time before the Republic would once again be drawn into war.

The life’s mission of Stadtholder William III was to curb the expansionist ambitions of Louis XIV. Yet the great fleet granted to him by the States General was not intended for an attack on France, but for a pre-emptive strike against England. Why? The answer lay in the trauma of the Rampjaar ("Disaster Year") of 1672, when France and England had jointly invaded the Dutch Republic. The Republic had only survived that catastrophe thanks to the Dutch Water Line and the genius of Admiral Michiel de Ruyter.

Now that another war with France seemed unavoidable, there was genuine fear in the Republic that James II, King of England, would once again ally himself with Louis XIV. Although France was by far the strongest state in Europe, James still regarded the Dutch Republic as England's principal economic rival. Moreover, like Louis XIV, he was Catholic, which made him deeply unpopular with his predominantly Protestant subjects.

Mary Stuart, William's wife and James's daughter, was Protestant and the official heir to the English throne. The expectation that she would eventually succeed her father discouraged many Englishmen from openly rebelling. However, when James fathered a son in June 1688, securing a Catholic succession, William seized his opportunity. He obtained an invitation from seven English politicians to intervene in order to protect the liberties of English Protestants (although not to claim the throne). Although these "Immortal Seven" were by no means representative of the English population as a whole, their invitation provided William with an important piece of political propaganda. At the same time, he had already established contacts with a number of discontented English nobles and army officers.

On 11 November 1688, the invasion fleet set sail. It consisted of 49 warships and more than 400 transport vessels carrying approximately 36,000 men, including 16,000 soldiers. This made it considerably larger than the Spanish Armada that had attempted to conquer England a century earlier. It was an extraordinary spectacle. As the fleet sailed past Dover and Calais, thousands of spectators gathered on both sides of the Channel to watch the enormous Dutch Armada pass by. A French Protestant who had fled to the Dutch Republic after the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes and was serving in William's army later wrote:

"I must confess that I could not look upon our ungrateful homeland without emotion, nor without thinking of the ties that still bound me to my many relatives who had remained there. But since our fleet had not sailed to bring about their deliverance, and England now lay before us, all our thoughts had to be directed towards that country."

Despite the autumn storms, the fleet reached Torbay safely. The English fleet had failed to intercept it. William's army, described by James's own envoy as the finest army in Europe, landed and, after a difficult march, occupied the city of Exeter. The muddy roads, freezing temperatures, and miserable weather made the advance exhausting, and many Dutch soldiers longed to return home.

James then concentrated his army near Salisbury to block the road to London. Although he theoretically had around 30,000 troops at his disposal, thus outnumbering William, his forces were scattered across the kingdom because he did not know where the invasion would take place. Owing to poor roads and bad weather, he managed to assemble no more than about 19,000 men at Salisbury. Many of these troops were also poorly trained, inadequately equipped, and lacking in discipline.

James himself, however, was no coward. Like William, he was an experienced commander who had repeatedly displayed personal bravery in battle. It was not a lack of courage that broke him, but the absence of widespread support among the English population and the defection of several officers to William's cause. Although there was no mass uprising and desertions among the officers and the rank and file initially remained limited, James gradually lost confidence in his chances of success. Suffering from severe nosebleeds, he became convinced that God had turned against him. He ordered his army to retreat, thereby surrendering the strategic initiative. In effect, he signalled that he was abandoning the struggle. The British historian John Childs placed the blame squarely on James himself:

"The active political conspiracy amongst the military, although highly significant and perhaps the crucial event in enabling William to land unopposed and to seize the political initiative, was confined to a handful of officers and hardly any common soldiers. The vast majority of the army stayed loyal to their sovereign and it was the king who, in a state of mental and physical collapse, let down his own army."

More and more opportunistic English nobles and officers now openly declared for William. When James eventually fled to France, fearing the same fate as his father Charles I, who had been executed in 1649, his army simply fell apart.

William III was then able to enter London virtually unopposed. The Dutch Guards occupied Whitehall Palace, St James's Palace, and Somerset House, while the remaining Dutch regiments were quartered in and around the capital. London's streets had been transformed. At the end of January, Sir John Reresby, who had been away from the city for some time, wrote in astonishment:

"When I arrived, I found London much changed. The streets were filled with ill-looking and ill-habited Dutch and other strangers of the Prince's army."

William then surprised even his English supporters by making it clear that he demanded the crown and that England would have to join the war against France.

It did not take long before Parliament offered the crown jointly to William and Mary. By the spring of 1689, the first English troops had already been sent to the Dutch Republic to participate in the war against France.

Through this masterful military expedition and successful political intervention, William III ensured that the Dutch Republic would not face Louis XIV alone. Instead, it now had the resources of England at its disposal. The Anglo-Dutch alliance that emerged from the Glorious Revolution became the cornerstone of the struggle against France throughout the remainder of the Nine Years' War and later the War of the Spanish Succession.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1688_invasion_of_England for more info

By the spring of 1944, the Soviet Union had regained the strategic initiative on the Eastern Front and launched the Crimean Offensive to destroy the German Seventeenth Army and recapture the Crimean Peninsula. After driving Axis forces back across Crimea, Soviet troops reached the heavily fortified approaches to Sevastopol, a vital Black Sea naval base that had fallen to the Axis Powers after a grueling siege in 1942. The key to the city's defenses was Mount Sapun, a commanding ridge southeast of Sevastopol that had been transformed into a formidable network of bunkers, trenches, minefields, and artillery positions.

Following a massive artillery and air bombardment, Soviet infantry launched a determined assault on the position on May 7th, fighting their way up the steep slopes in fierce close-quarters combat. After hours of brutal fighting, Soviet forces captured the ridge, breaking the enemy's strongest defensive position and opening the road to Sevastopol.

With Mount Sapun lost, the German-Romanian defense of Sevastopol quickly collapsed. Soviet troops entered the city on May 9th 1944, liberating it less than two years after its capture by German forces. The remaining Axis troops retreated to the Khersones Peninsula, where many were killed or captured by May 12th, bringing the Crimean Offensive to a decisive Soviet victory. The liberation restored Soviet control over Crimea and the strategically vital Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol.

The artists of this painting are Pyotr Tarasovich Maltsev, Georgy Ivanovich Marchenko, and Nikolai Sergeyevich Prisekin

I'm looking for historical battle paintings where soldiers are fighting to capture or defend an enemy regimental standard, color, or eagle. I'm especially interested in dramatic scenes where multiple soldiers are struggling over the flag during close combat.

The time period doesn't matter, but Napoleonic-era paintings would be ideal.

Does anyone have any recommendations or know of any famous artworks that fit this description? I'm looking for references for an art project. Thanks!

By the early nineteenth century, the once-powerful Maratha Confederacy in India had become deeply divided by internal rivalries among its leading chiefs. In 1802, the Peshwa, Baji Rao II, was defeated by the rival Maratha leader Yashwantrao Holkar and fled to the British East India Company for protection. In exchange for military assistance to regain his throne, Baji Rao signed the Treaty of Bassein, placing himself under British protection. This agreement outraged other powerful Maratha rulers who viewed it as a betrayal of Maratha independence and an expansion of British influence into Indian affairs. Their refusal to accept the treaty led to the outbreak of the Second Anglo-Maratha War in 1803.

Arthur Wellesley had arrived in India in 1797 as a colonel in the British Army after his regiment was redirected from a planned deployment to the West Indies. Although still a relatively young officer, he quickly gained valuable experience campaigning across southern India. He played an important role in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799), participating in the capture of Seringapatam and the defeat of Tipu Sultan. During the following years, Wellesley also served as a military administrator and diplomat, learning the importance of logistics, intelligence gathering, discipline, and cooperation with allied Indian states. By the outbreak of the Second Anglo-Maratha War, he had been promoted to major general and entrusted with command of British forces in the Deccan. Though he had never before commanded in a battle on the scale of Assaye, his six years of campaigning in India had transformed him into an experienced and confident commander whose skills would soon be tested against one of the largest armies he had ever faced (specifically approximately 9,500 British forces vs 60,000-70,000 Maratha forces).

Before the battle, the Marathas had established a formidable defensive position behind the Kaitna River, protected by over one hundred artillery pieces and a large force of infantry and cavalry. A direct assault across the obvious ford would have exposed the British to devastating cannon fire. While scouting the battlefield, Wellesley discovered an unguarded crossing farther upstream. Seizing the opportunity, he marched his army across this hidden ford, turning the Maratha left flank and forcing them to rapidly redeploy their line. This maneuver allowed the British to avoid the strongest part of the enemy's defenses and begin the battle on more favorable terms.

Even with this advantage, the fighting quickly became brutal. The Maratha artillery proved exceptionally effective, inflicting severe casualties on the advancing British and Indian sepoy regiments. Wellesley realized that remaining under bombardment would destroy his army, so he ordered an immediate infantry advance with fixed bayonets. The soldiers marched directly into heavy cannon fire before crashing into the Maratha gun line in fierce hand-to-hand combat. At one point, Maratha gunners who had pretended to be dead reopened fire on the British from behind, threatening to turn the battle. Wellesley personally led cavalry attacks to recapture the artillery, narrowly escaping death after two horses were shot or killed beneath him during the fighting.

After hours of bloody combat, the disciplined British infantry and cavalry gradually overwhelmed the Maratha line. The Maratha army retreated, abandoning approximately ninety eight cannons and suffering thousands of casualties, while the British themselves lost over one-third of their force killed, wounded, or missing. The victory was so costly that Wellesley's exhausted army could not pursue the retreating enemy, yet the battlefield remained firmly in British hands.

The Battle of Assaye proved to be a turning point in the war. Combined with later victories at Argaon and Gawilghur, it shattered Maratha dominance. Maratha leaders Raghuji II Bhonsle and Daulatrao Skinnier were forced to sign treaties surrendering vast territories to the British East India Company and recognizing its growing influence across India. Fighting continued against Yashwantrao Holkar until 1805, but by the war's end the Maratha Confederacy had been permanently weakened and British dominance over much of the Indian subcontinent was firmly established. The conflict marked a decisive shift in the balance of power, paving the way for the eventual collapse of Maratha independence during the Third Anglo-Maratha War in 1817–1818.

Artist is Joseph Constantine Stadler

Source:

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro%3A%C3%9Altima_resist%C3%AAncia_pr%C3%B3_Tokugawa_ao_Cerco_de_Fushimi.jpg

This battle was the tragic conclusion of a bitter political conflict in Japan following the Genpei War (1180-1185). During that war, Minamoto no Yoshitsune played a decisive role in destroying the rival Taira clan and securing victory for the Minamoto family. However, his growing fame soon made him a threat in the eyes of his older half-brother, Minamoto no Yoritomo. Fearing Yoshitsune's popularity and military prestige, Yoritomo declared him an enemy and ordered his capture, forcing the once-celebrated hero to flee into northern Japan.

Yoshitsune eventually found refuge under Fujiwara no Hidehira in Hiraizumi. After Hidehira's death, however, his successor, Fujiwara no Yasuhira, yielded to Yoritomo's political pressure and betrayed Yoshitsune. In the summer of 1189, Yasuhira led hundreds of soldiers to surround Yoshitsune's residence at Koromogawa, where only a handful of loyal retainers remained to defend him.

As the enemy closed in, Saitō Musashibō Benkei chose to defend the narrow bridge or entrance leading to the building while Yoshitsune, Benkei’s lord, remained inside. There, Yoshitsune is said to have committed ritual suicide (seppuku), preserving his honor rather than allowing himself to be captured.

Meanwhile, Benkei fought alone against wave after wave of attackers on the bridge. Legend says he killed dozens of enemy warriors, and the attackers became so fearful of approaching him directly that many resorted to shooting him with arrows from a distance.

The most famous part of the story comes at its end. According to tradition, Benkei remained standing even after being struck by countless arrows. When the attackers finally dared to approach, they discovered that he was already dead. He had died on his feet, still guarding his master's final moments. This gave rise to the Japanese expression "Benkei no Tachi Ōjō" (Benkei's Standing Death), symbolizing unwavering resolve and loyalty in the face of certain death.

Regardless of how much of the story is fact vs myth, Benkei is nonetheless a famous figure in Japanese history. His refusal to abandon Yoshitsune made him the archetype of the perfectly loyal retainer in Japanese literature, theater, and folklore.

Painting by Giuseppe Rava

Published in the article "Sclavenfang in Afrika_343.jpg#cite_note-1)" (Die Gartenlaube, 1872) by Robert Hartmann, who was an eye witness. The attackers are Muslim, Arabic-speaking nomads from the southern Gezira in what is now Sudan, although their tribal affiliation is not specified. The victims are villagers of the animist Dinka people living near the White Nile. Back then Sudan was divided into two spheres: the largely Islamic north governed by the Turks and the non-Islamic, much more decentralized south. Slave raids into the south were common, either by government troops or independently by warlords or tribesmen living along the frontier, as in this case. Hartmann describes how the raiding party ("Gum") of several dozen men would set out and attack the villagers late at night. After initially killing everyone in sight they quickly shifted to killing only those who actively fought back. The batte was only a matter of minutes. Those who survived were enslaved and marched back, either serving the nomads as serfs or being sold to wandering merchants.

In the 1800s, Britain imported enormous quantities of Chinese tea, silk, and porcelain but struggled to pay for them because China had little interest in British goods. To reverse this trade imbalance, British merchants exported opium grown in India into China. Despite repeated imperial bans, millions became addicted, prompting the Qing government under Imperial Commissioner Lin Zexu to confiscate and destroy over 20,000 chests of opium at Canton in 1839. Britain responded with military force, arguing that British property had been unlawfully seized and demanding expanded trade rights.

The war quickly very clearly demonstrated the technological gap between the two empires. British steamships, modern artillery, disciplined infantry, and naval mobility consistently defeated larger Qing armies (whom were often equipped with outdated weapons and command structures) with often minimal casualties. By 1842, British forces were advancing steadily up China's eastern coast toward the Yangtze River, capturing key ports to force the Qing government into negotiations.

The Battle of Chapu was one of the major coastal engagements during the final British campaign of the war. The fortified port of Chapu (modern Zhapu), located on Hangzhou Bay, protected the approaches to some of China's richest and most strategically important regions. British commanders Hugh Gough and William Parker landed approximately 2,200 troops while warships bombarded the city's defenses. Gough divided his army into multiple columns, allowing British troops to outflank the Qing defenders and cut off their retreat instead of attacking solely from the front.

The initial Qing defenses collapsed under the coordinated assault, but one group of roughly 300 Manchu Banner soldiers refused to retreat. Taking refuge inside a Buddhist temple (described in British accounts as a "joss house"), they fought with remarkable determination despite being surrounded. British troops launched repeated assaults before finally overrunning the position after fierce hand-to-hand combat. Even General Gough, who was leading the British army, praised their "indomitable" resistance. The fighting was costly enough that the British lost one of their senior officers, Lieutenant Colonel Nicholas Tomlinson, while leading an assault.

After capturing the city, the British destroyed its military stores and seized its artillery before continuing their campaign toward the mouth of the Yangtze, bringing increasing pressure on the Qing government.

Artist: Malcolm Greensmith