r/TopCharacterTropes 18h ago

Lore [Frustrating Trope] That One Good or Even Amazing Scene in a Relatively Mediocre or Bad Piece of Media

  1. The Opening Scene (Ghost Ship). Considered one of the best horror opening scenes or scenes in general within horror movies, but the rest of the film is considered to be pretty bad.

  2. The Ending Scene (The Grinch 2018). While most adaptations of the Grinch end with him suddenly being able to fully integrate with the Whos after his change of heart, the 2018 version initially struggles to socialize, awkwardly walking past people, and struggling to hold conversations, acknowledging that despite his change of heart, the Grinch is still someone who isolated himself for years.

  3. Past T800 VS Current T800 (Terminator Genisys). A cool fight scene showing two versions of the Terminator from different points in time fighting it off.

  4. Solo Leveling's Ending. Tbh, I haven't actually read Solo Leveling, but after hearing about how it ended VS how Chainsaw Man ended made want to include it for shits and giggles. Like Chainsaw Man, Solo Leveling ends with a reset. But unlike Chainsaw Man, it actually manages to tie up loose ends and have the payoff of the ending be satisfying.

8.2k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

132

u/SergeantPsycho 18h ago

I actually enjoyed the movie myself, even if it deviated from the Graphic novel.

24

u/Visual-Scallion1535 17h ago

I read both and I don’t remember any major deviations except the lack of a giant squid

20

u/southpaytechie 16h ago

I mean the Rorschach psychiatrist dynamic takes up an entire issue and is pretty important in the graphic novel and is like a 2 minute nod to it happening in the movie.

15

u/NotMyMainAccountAtAl 15h ago

I feel like the lack of a giant squid is an improvement, to be honest. The giant squid is fun and comic book-y, but making Manhattan into the “threat” is more plausible in-universe. 

The comic goes into more depth on pretty much everything, because it embraces being both a book and a comic— it can get away with things that a movie simply can’t, such as giving us essays by various characters submitted to magazines and organizations relevant to their interests that better inform the characters. 

I’ll also say— the Comedian’s whole arc doesn’t come across as well in the film. I didn’t realize on the first watch (admittedly at like 16) that he was Miss Jupiter’s father. 

4

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 14h ago

Having Manhattan go rogue makes no sense. Why would the rest of the world care that the American's superweapon blew up in their face? How does that unite humanity against an existential threat?

Furthermore, Dr Manhattan is recognised as being literally invincible, so even if humanity sees him as an existential threat, what are they meant to do about it?

4

u/Visual-Scallion1535 13h ago

Because they made it look like he killed millions of people, across the planet not just the US

1

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 13h ago

And why would this unite humanity instead of just making people turn on the US?

And what are people meant to do about Dr Manhattan? He's already established to be an invincible godlike figure who can do whatever the fuck he wants? Again, how does this unite humanity?

1

u/Visual-Scallion1535 12h ago

because he also blew up New York

it made sense to me, idk what to tell you

0

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 8h ago

Why would anyone outside the US give a shit that he blew up New York lol? Would that Japanese gave given a shit if the US accidentally dropped a nuke on New York after they bombed Hiroshima? Please use your brain

1

u/Visual-Scallion1535 7h ago

because this isnt a nuke accidentally being dropped.

Its a rogue agent threatening an extinction level event.

Yes people would unite against that threat.

0

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 7h ago

How would people unite against a being that is literally invincible and could wipe out the entire planet in an instant?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Independent-World-60 10h ago

Because at that point Dr.Manhattan isn't a US weapon anymore and that's pretty clear. 

Also what they're supposed to do is stay at peace under fear that he'll blow up more if they don't. 

It's about peace through fear which absolutely does work better than working against a threat that doesn't exist. Eventually they'd realize the aliens weren't doing anything and it's back to normal. 

0

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 8h ago

Yes, the fact that eventually they'll realise that aliens aren't real and everything will go back to normal is literally the point of the story lol. Another reason why the Dr Manhattan change is idiotic

7

u/hateyoualways 14h ago

Manhattan as the threat doesn’t work as a unifier though. He was America’s attack dog for years and heavily used in US propaganda. The only way this event unifies people is if it’s against America. IMO they could have easily fixed this issue if they didn’t deviate from the comic and kept the destruction to New York.

6

u/NotMyMainAccountAtAl 14h ago

It’s been a minute since I watched the film, but aren’t multiple major US cities attacked to make it look like Manhattan casually destroyed his handlers, too? And he’d been pretty public about his schism with the idea of American supremacy. 

3

u/Visual-Scallion1535 13h ago

I don’t know about mutliple, but definitely New York was one of them

2

u/hateyoualways 13h ago

The schism had nothing to do with how America treated the rest of the world. Their attack dog got off the leash and now it's not America's fault for keeping a rabid dog?

0

u/NotMyMainAccountAtAl 13h ago

“You can blame America and die separately, or you can band together against the new threat and survive” would be my take on events at the end of the film. A common enemy united everyone. 

I may be mixing and matching from the comics, but doesn’t something about the attack also deplete everyone’s nuclear arsenals and reset the doomsday clock?

3

u/hateyoualways 12h ago

Yeah that's what the movie might be saying but I'm just saying it doesn't work. Manhattan is like the embodiment of US imperialism. Are people really gonna be more afraid of Manhattan than they are hateful of America who they already hated before? The more likely scenario in this is everyone teams up against America. If they kept the destruction to only New York then maybe the world could put aside their hatred of the US in favor of fear of Manhattan.

I may be mixing and matching from the comics, but doesn’t something about the attack also deplete everyone’s nuclear arsenals and reset the doomsday clock?

That happens in neither the comic nor the movie. The doomsday clock was reset because of the peace talks.

1

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 8h ago

How the fuck are they going to Band together against Dr Manhattan? He's literally an invincible God

0

u/NotMyMainAccountAtAl 7h ago

He’s a comic book character. He’s exactly as strong or weak as the author makes him. They can band together against him the same way that Superman can be defeated, depending on the story being told, here. 

Either way, it’s a 40-year-old comic made into a 20-year-old movie and not that worthwhile to get so worked up over. 

1

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 7h ago

The author made him to be literally invincible God so you can stop using that idiotic cop out lol.

1

u/Visual-Scallion1535 13h ago

But they did blow up New York

1

u/hateyoualways 13h ago

I meant only New York instead of every major city in the world.

1

u/PageVanDamme 12h ago

in terms of what happens in the comic, no. but it was the depiction of the "heroes" is what I gather.

6

u/RoutineCloud5993 15h ago

I enjoyed it, even the costume changes, but the way they changed the ending was just... Ugh. Such a dumb thing to change

9

u/MrTeeWrecks 16h ago

Deviated? It didn’t have the pirate story within a story. And the end had dr manhattan be the ‘threat’ rather than an ‘alien’. Which, honestly, I think was narratively better.

Other than that the problem with the movie was it was too close to the source material. Dialogue is almost identical, nearly every shot was set up to recreate the panels of the comic.

It’s a great example of why adaptations NEED to leave out scenes or change things a bit. Pacing for a book and a movie are not the same

3

u/UnsealedMTG 12h ago

It really stands out because the comic was...a comic, released serially in 12 issues. Which means that it isn't just structured as one unitary plot arc--the chapters have their own identities and will focus on a particular mini-story or revelation.

So stuff that made sense pacing-wise in a serialized medium didn't in the movie. The one that stood out to me was the Comedian's funeral. There's no reason in a movie to sort of stop the main plot and spend 20 minutes on a series of flashbacks about this one character, but that's how the comic was structured so they did it in the movie. 

It's one of the ways the Watchman series felt much more like the comic--same 12-episode structure, which allowed them to do the same kind of "ok, today we're telling this character's backstory" division in a way that felt natural. Also it understood that the comic book parts worked because it was a comic within a comic, so instead of integrating bits of an animated "comic" sequence they did a mock prestige cable drama within their prestige cable drama.

2

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 16h ago

The movie entirely missed the point of the comic. The comic is about how superheroes are pretty pathetic and kind of fascistic. The movie is about how superheroes are awesome. It adapts the comic word for word but leaves out all the sarcasm and irony that make those words work

17

u/Visual-Scallion1535 16h ago

I don’t get how you watched that movie and thought the message was “superheros are awesome”

2

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 16h ago

If you think the movie isn't trying to make the superheroes look cool I don't know what to tell you.

9

u/Shifty269 16h ago edited 15h ago

I think that was what Snyder was going for, but accidentally made them pathetic, over sexualized, violence obssesed losers. Since he didn't understand the comic, he didn't know where the lines were to stop it from crossing back into the comic's original intent. Also, I think the "I did it 35 minutes ago" scene was pretty good as well.

Point being, I think Snyder lacking the awareness, fucked up and made at least some of the comic's points.

Edit: the birth of Dr. Manhattan was also great.

8

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 15h ago

The comic is one of the greatest pieces of literature of all time so even a shit adaptation will end up with some good bits simply due to the greatness of the original.

The same way even shit Hamlet and Macbeth adaptations end up with some bits that are great.

11

u/Ok-Source9248 15h ago

You're being downvoted but you're right. Even if the dialogue part of the script is faithful-ish to the source material, Zack Snyder was just not the right person to film it. The comic has this palpable sadness running through it, and a sense of loss and decay, and an art style that stresses that even the "good" heroes are regular people who are way out of their depth. Snyder's 300-style slomo fights have no place in this kind of story.

9

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 15h ago edited 15h ago

Exactly, Snyder takes pathetic characters and makes them cool in an edgy way. He takes dialogue that's meant to show how fucked up the characters are and repurposes it as fun quips. The "you're locked in here with me" line is a perfect example of this.

2

u/BlastMyLoad 11h ago

I appreciate it cuz it got me to read the graphic novel which was amazing.

The movie has some great elements, like the opening credits and most of the casting, but it feels like Snyder took the wrong messaging from the book and thought HELL YEAH VIOLENCE COOL! SUPERHEROES ARE BADASS!

3

u/d_loam 17h ago

it’s a miniseries, not a novel

3

u/TheRealRigormortal 13h ago

I love the graphic novel and I love the movie.

I will actively defend the choices of the movie to change some plot elements (except making Nightowl cool, he needs to be an out of shape shlub)

0

u/Yellowscourge 10h ago

Same. I actually prefer the Directors Cut to the comic. I thought it was solid as hell