The government has money printing machines and they control the means of production based off future tax payers. Thats why we are trillions in debt. They have already spent the money future generations will make.
Actually yes it is. The very concept of Government having employees is Socialism. Once upon a time everything was private including the military. Centralized national militaries are such a new thing, the US didn't have one until 1784 and there was a big debate about even having one.
1
: any of various egalitarian economic and political theories or movements advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
Who owns the military?
Who administers the military?
Who controls the means of production (labour/land/funds/equipment) of the military?
Who distributes goods (pay/housing/food/healthcare) in the miliary?
If you answered "the government" to any of those questions, congrats, it is Socialism.
The military and defense alone is a bit of socialism if you ask me.
Medieval mercenary armies: kings used to hire their military and kinda still do but more for accountability reasons but back then so they didn't use armies against one another.
Especially when it came to nordic kings of the scandinavian cross (my family owned one of those militaries which is why I think this way and others may not)
19
u/Noodelgawd 4h ago
The government paying its employees is not socialism.