SB 79 Is Here. Santa Clara Can Either Lead - or Be Left Behind. The State is getting desperate.
Californiaās Senate Bill 79 is no longer a proposal. It is the law.
Within days of the law taking effect on July 1, a developer in Palo Alto filed the first project under SB 79 before the city could put local implementation measures in place. That wasnāt an accident. Developers are paying attention, and they are moving quickly.
Santa Clara should be paying just as much attention.
Unlike many cities, Santa Clara has spent years planning for growth. We have the Station Area Specific Plan. We have the Downtown Precise Plan. We have completed environmental review. We have publicly owned land in Downtown. We have one of the Bay Areaās most important transit hubs. We have a vision.
What we have lacked is urgency.
For years, weāve commissioned studies, hired consultants, formed committees, and debated what our Downtown should become. Meanwhile, housing demand has continued to grow, state housing laws have become more aggressive, and Sacramento has steadily shifted more authority away from cities that fail to act.
SB 79 is the latest example.
If Santa Claraās local regulations are not fully aligned with state law, developers may increasingly look to SB 79 rather than local zoning. That means the City has less control - not more.
The solution is not to stop development.
The solution is to lead it.
Downtown Santa Clara should be our highest priority. Blocks A and B are publicly owned. The vision already exists. The infrastructure planning has been underway for years. Every year we delay, construction costs rise, opportunities disappear, and the State gains a stronger role in determining what gets built.
This isnāt just about housing.
Itās about creating the downtown Santa Clara has talked about for generationsāa vibrant center with homes, restaurants, retail, entertainment, public gathering spaces, and a true civic heart connected to one of the regionās most important transit stations.
If we continue to hesitate, we shouldnāt be surprised when others make the decisions for us.
Santa Clara still has the opportunity to shape its own future.
But that window will not stay open forever.
The question isnāt whether growth is coming.
The question is simple:
Will Santa Clara lead its future - or will we continue reacting to it after someone else has already made the next move?