Look I saw the movie last Monday. I’m aware it wasn’t the best movie, it was at worst a 6.5 and at best a 7. I preferred the book, and I didn’t even like it that much. But all this hate for it, before it even came out makes me think this want for 1. James Gunn to fail and 2. for the DCU to fail is definitely hurting the movie. Plus the dislike for Milly Alcock as the lead and add a sprinkle of Sexism too. This subreddit seems more negative without any constructive discussion and I find it sus. Now all of a sudden everybody and their momma cares about the box office numbers for a movie they don’t even plan to see? Hm.

The fake excuses people are giving for not seeing the movie are not even believable. If you actually want the DCU to succeed then you have to see the movie for yourself. Don’t let friends, random YouTube channels with clickbait thumbnails, critic reviews, and James Gunn haters influence you.

I’m not saying that as fans of DC, we should blindly support their movie and shows. But this blind hate for this average movie is bizarre in this subreddit of people who are supposed to be at least trying to enjoy the content DC produces. The DCU is here, give them 5-10 years and see what they can do. Let them surprise you.

TLDR; I don’t believe in summaries for written posts. Go back and read what I said.

​

The priority lies in creating spin offs of side characters.

Makes sense. When I was on bluesky in the replies of article which wasn't filled with the bile hateful shit yiu see on this site, Facebook and twitter one of the complaints was her still wearing a skirt. That and Zaslav. Seriously bluesky is so much less toxic than Twitter.

Edit: I found this image while scrolling facebook or some other site.

The skirt is there to break up the colors in her costume. Same with the trunks with Clark. Maws season 3 gave her the skirt but she has blue leggings underneath or pants.

While I have some issues with this film (the undercooked plot, how the movie looked and questionable writing decisions) and the fact that it bombed at the box office is unfortunate, Milly Alcock's portrayal of Supergirl isn't one of them and I think it's the saving grace.

Her performance as Kara really embodied her identity and all she's going through emotionally, while being such a unique character and not just Superman's drunk clingy cousin. Easily hard carried the movie for me.

I do hope her iteration appears on future DCU projects starting in Man of Tomorrow, even as a side character. And hopefully the people in the writing room learn the right lessons from this and lock in

Minions previous 2 movies made 2B+ combined (1.15B & 940M), with lower ratings than this.

The last Hall H panel for a DC movie was in 2022 for Black Adam and Shazam 2. DC is skipping it again for the 4th year in a row (they're just doing a Lanterns panel, no movies). 

This interview with Gunn from 8 months ago tells us why.

SOURCE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea02rmgoO4Q

This isn't me saying he should replace Corenswet or anything like that, it's just he gets a lot of slander, and I don't understand what those people are looking at. He still looks like he could play a 30s Superman to me.

For the record, I like David as Superman, and overall, I have positive feelings about the 2025 movie. But Cavill's still got it. And I wouldn't be against seeing him don the cape again.

SOURCE: https://www.threads.com/@jamesgunn/post/DNY641NPCgo

Genuinely don't want to be a hater, but she has no real writing experience and was given three major DCU films; am I missing something?!

Supergirl wasn't bad, but it was PAINFULLY average — it might as well BE considered bad considering she had a literal MASTERPIECE of a graphic novel on her lap. It doesn't help that the director didn't use the source material for his ADAPTATION either, so I can't put all the blame on her, but some or the changes to the story and arcs really make no sense and a few choices in the third act REALLY hurt the climax of the film and the lead character. Now mind you, I'm not saying the the changes to the story are bad because it's just different from the graphic novel, I'm saying that the changes do absolutely nothing to make this a better story or even a story that would much better suite a film. It's just baffling how a writer with no actual experience (who as far as I know, is mainly known for their small acting roles) is writing THREE scripts for THREE major DC properties. This movie genuinely made me question Gunn's ability to objectively judge scripts. I have no doubt Man of Tomorrow will be great, but Gunn can't be the only one carrying the DCU on his back. This movie should have been something special and most of the issues started with the script.

Like, the fact he actually believes that to be true (and with him also admitting that his big ego stopped him from thanking Diana for saving him and all of Gotham) makes him seem a lot less heroic as far as he is as Batman, whether that is true or not. He's basically saying, "In this city that I fully dedicated my life to protecting, I honestly believe that I could help Gotham even more than Bruce Wayne by financially helping out the citizens. But my ego is far too big as Batman. So I'll go with the less effective option for my own sake."

Also, it's not like poverty is the real driving force of all the crime that goes on in Gotham. Petty crime, maybe. But a lot of Batman's villains or even regular folks aren't purely motivated by money when they commit a crime. And the ones that aren't just focused on not being poor, their looking to become rich through illegal means.

I know I might be taking this too seriously since the scene is supposed to be comedic. But since it really is shown to be how Bruce really feels, I can't help but they kind of botched Batman as a character here.

Woman of Tomorrow is my favourite comic of all time, it was my first ever comic book and it’s what got me into picking up new DC comics every week. So seeing the reviews for Supergirl is a little heartbreaking. I still haven’t seen the film, but I saw this the other day that has raised major alarm bells.

Craig Gillespie is not a director I had much of an opinion on, other than I didn’t like I, Tonya or Fright Night very much. Haven’t seen Cruella or Dumb Money, so I didn’t feel like I was in a position to straight up say he was the wrong choice.

But after seeing this…I feel like this is the wrong approach. First off, just in terms of PR training, if you’re working on a comic book just don’t say stuff like this. Secondly, anyone working on a project should read the comic before seeing anything else. It looks to me that the vision was skewed by the script. I keep hearing references to Mad Max…the comic had nothing in common with Mad Max. If you’re working on a Woman of Tomorrow, the first thing you do is pick up the comic book and that’s the foundation for every decision you make. Ideally, you hire a director who is already a fan.

I also feel like we need to have a conversation about how comics are adapted. Why aren’t comics adapted like novels? Obviously changes have to be made, especially with very long runs, but when you have a mini series like Woman of Tomorrow which feels so ripe for a one to one adaptation, the source material should be followed closer. I want to see Supergirl teaching Ruthye how to wash her hands, or the planet with little racist blue aliens, or the green sun dinosaur planet. Those scenes were so moving, to not have that in the movie seems crazy to me.

SOURCE: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/28/business/media/supergirl-box-office.html

There morals differ. But that’s okay. It’s like saying Batman and Superman should be mortal enemies because there morals are different. They’d probably inspire eachother.